Evaluating the Impact of Hospital Accreditation on Patient Safety Culture in Saudi Arabia Healthcare Facilities.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-11-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S480496
Abdulghfoor Abdurabuh, Mahar Diana Hamid, Che Rosmani Che Hassan, Mohammad I Fatani
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Hospital Accreditation on Patient Safety Culture in Saudi Arabia Healthcare Facilities.","authors":"Abdulghfoor Abdurabuh, Mahar Diana Hamid, Che Rosmani Che Hassan, Mohammad I Fatani","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S480496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of hospital accreditation on the organizational safety culture among healthcare workers, an essential indicator of patient safety, has yet to be directly quantified in Saudi Arabia's healthcare system. This study aims to investigate this impact to sustain and maintain a positive safety culture in Saudi Arabia's healthcare institutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional assessment was conducted in five public hospitals in Makkah. Three hundred forty healthcare workers participated using a self-administered questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, one-sample <i>t</i>-test, and multiple regression for a comprehensive understanding.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Regression analysis revealed significant gender differences in patient safety ratings (B = 0.480, p < 0.001). Age positively influenced scores, with higher ages resulting in higher scores (B = 0.127, p = 0.041). The ratings were also associated with respondents' nationality (B = 0.169, p < 0.001) and education levels (B = -0.186, p < 0.001). Respondents rated disasters and training as the highest in patient safety culture, followed by facility safety and security, hazards and hazardous materials safety, utility and building safety, fire safety, and quality improvement. At the same time, leadership, commitment, and support received the lowest score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study illustrates a strong connection between accreditation and improved patient safety, emphasizing the importance of quality improvement and leadership commitment. These insights can guide policymakers and healthcare executives in Saudi Arabia and similar countries toward developing a robust patient safety culture. It stresses the importance of considering human factors and organizational culture when developing patient safety models.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"17 ","pages":"5021-5033"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S480496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of hospital accreditation on the organizational safety culture among healthcare workers, an essential indicator of patient safety, has yet to be directly quantified in Saudi Arabia's healthcare system. This study aims to investigate this impact to sustain and maintain a positive safety culture in Saudi Arabia's healthcare institutions.

Methods: A cross-sectional assessment was conducted in five public hospitals in Makkah. Three hundred forty healthcare workers participated using a self-administered questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, one-sample t-test, and multiple regression for a comprehensive understanding.

Results and discussion: Regression analysis revealed significant gender differences in patient safety ratings (B = 0.480, p < 0.001). Age positively influenced scores, with higher ages resulting in higher scores (B = 0.127, p = 0.041). The ratings were also associated with respondents' nationality (B = 0.169, p < 0.001) and education levels (B = -0.186, p < 0.001). Respondents rated disasters and training as the highest in patient safety culture, followed by facility safety and security, hazards and hazardous materials safety, utility and building safety, fire safety, and quality improvement. At the same time, leadership, commitment, and support received the lowest score.

Conclusion: This study illustrates a strong connection between accreditation and improved patient safety, emphasizing the importance of quality improvement and leadership commitment. These insights can guide policymakers and healthcare executives in Saudi Arabia and similar countries toward developing a robust patient safety culture. It stresses the importance of considering human factors and organizational culture when developing patient safety models.

评估医院评审对沙特阿拉伯医疗机构患者安全文化的影响。
背景:医院评审对医护人员组织安全文化的影响是患者安全的重要指标,但在沙特阿拉伯的医疗保健系统中,这一影响尚未直接量化。本研究旨在调查这一影响,以维持和维护沙特阿拉伯医疗机构积极的安全文化:在麦加的五家公立医院进行了横向评估。340 名医护人员通过自填问卷参与了评估。采用描述性统计、方差分析、单样本 t 检验和多元回归法对数据进行分析,以全面了解情况:回归分析表明,在患者安全评分方面存在明显的性别差异(B = 0.480,P < 0.001)。年龄对评分有积极影响,年龄越大,评分越高(B = 0.127,p = 0.041)。评分还与受访者的国籍(B = 0.169,p < 0.001)和教育水平(B = -0.186,p < 0.001)有关。在患者安全文化中,受访者对灾难和培训的评价最高,其次是设施安全和安保、危险和有害物质安全、公用设施和建筑安全、消防安全和质量改进。同时,领导力、承诺和支持得分最低:本研究说明了评审与改善患者安全之间的密切联系,强调了质量改进和领导承诺的重要性。这些见解可以指导沙特阿拉伯和类似国家的政策制定者和医疗保健管理人员建立健全的患者安全文化。它强调了在开发患者安全模型时考虑人为因素和组织文化的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信