Abdulghfoor Abdurabuh, Mahar Diana Hamid, Che Rosmani Che Hassan, Mohammad I Fatani
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Hospital Accreditation on Patient Safety Culture in Saudi Arabia Healthcare Facilities.","authors":"Abdulghfoor Abdurabuh, Mahar Diana Hamid, Che Rosmani Che Hassan, Mohammad I Fatani","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S480496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of hospital accreditation on the organizational safety culture among healthcare workers, an essential indicator of patient safety, has yet to be directly quantified in Saudi Arabia's healthcare system. This study aims to investigate this impact to sustain and maintain a positive safety culture in Saudi Arabia's healthcare institutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional assessment was conducted in five public hospitals in Makkah. Three hundred forty healthcare workers participated using a self-administered questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, one-sample <i>t</i>-test, and multiple regression for a comprehensive understanding.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Regression analysis revealed significant gender differences in patient safety ratings (B = 0.480, p < 0.001). Age positively influenced scores, with higher ages resulting in higher scores (B = 0.127, p = 0.041). The ratings were also associated with respondents' nationality (B = 0.169, p < 0.001) and education levels (B = -0.186, p < 0.001). Respondents rated disasters and training as the highest in patient safety culture, followed by facility safety and security, hazards and hazardous materials safety, utility and building safety, fire safety, and quality improvement. At the same time, leadership, commitment, and support received the lowest score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study illustrates a strong connection between accreditation and improved patient safety, emphasizing the importance of quality improvement and leadership commitment. These insights can guide policymakers and healthcare executives in Saudi Arabia and similar countries toward developing a robust patient safety culture. It stresses the importance of considering human factors and organizational culture when developing patient safety models.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S480496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The impact of hospital accreditation on the organizational safety culture among healthcare workers, an essential indicator of patient safety, has yet to be directly quantified in Saudi Arabia's healthcare system. This study aims to investigate this impact to sustain and maintain a positive safety culture in Saudi Arabia's healthcare institutions.
Methods: A cross-sectional assessment was conducted in five public hospitals in Makkah. Three hundred forty healthcare workers participated using a self-administered questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, one-sample t-test, and multiple regression for a comprehensive understanding.
Results and discussion: Regression analysis revealed significant gender differences in patient safety ratings (B = 0.480, p < 0.001). Age positively influenced scores, with higher ages resulting in higher scores (B = 0.127, p = 0.041). The ratings were also associated with respondents' nationality (B = 0.169, p < 0.001) and education levels (B = -0.186, p < 0.001). Respondents rated disasters and training as the highest in patient safety culture, followed by facility safety and security, hazards and hazardous materials safety, utility and building safety, fire safety, and quality improvement. At the same time, leadership, commitment, and support received the lowest score.
Conclusion: This study illustrates a strong connection between accreditation and improved patient safety, emphasizing the importance of quality improvement and leadership commitment. These insights can guide policymakers and healthcare executives in Saudi Arabia and similar countries toward developing a robust patient safety culture. It stresses the importance of considering human factors and organizational culture when developing patient safety models.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.