Surgical Treatments for Facial Aberrant Reinnervation Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Forrest W Fearington, Gloria Rodriguez, Nicholas R Randall, Jacob K Dey
{"title":"Surgical Treatments for Facial Aberrant Reinnervation Syndrome: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Forrest W Fearington, Gloria Rodriguez, Nicholas R Randall, Jacob K Dey","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome is characterized by aberrant facial muscle reinnervation after facial nerve injury producing facial synkinesis, hypertonicity, and muscle spasm. <b>Objective:</b> To systematically review the surgical treatments for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome and assess their effectiveness as measured by patient-reported outcomes, physician-graded outcomes, or computer-automated grading systems. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Texts reporting outcomes of any surgical treatment for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome from 2003 to 2023 were included. <b>Results:</b> After screening, 25 studies with 731 patients were included. Surgical procedures included selective neurectomy (SN), selective myectomy (SM), cross-facial nerve graft, masseter nerve transfer, and gracilis muscle transfer. All surgical techniques and combinations showed significant improvement in at least one clinical outcome measure from baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.05), although one study found no significant improvement. Thirty different outcome measures were used, the most common being the FaCE and eFACE scales (seven studies each). <b>Conclusions:</b> All surgical procedures in this review yield improved clinical outcome measures for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome, with SN and SM being the dominant surgical treatments. Standardized outcome assessment and more nuanced patient evaluation are necessary to determine the most effective surgical treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome is characterized by aberrant facial muscle reinnervation after facial nerve injury producing facial synkinesis, hypertonicity, and muscle spasm. Objective: To systematically review the surgical treatments for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome and assess their effectiveness as measured by patient-reported outcomes, physician-graded outcomes, or computer-automated grading systems. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Texts reporting outcomes of any surgical treatment for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome from 2003 to 2023 were included. Results: After screening, 25 studies with 731 patients were included. Surgical procedures included selective neurectomy (SN), selective myectomy (SM), cross-facial nerve graft, masseter nerve transfer, and gracilis muscle transfer. All surgical techniques and combinations showed significant improvement in at least one clinical outcome measure from baseline (p < 0.05), although one study found no significant improvement. Thirty different outcome measures were used, the most common being the FaCE and eFACE scales (seven studies each). Conclusions: All surgical procedures in this review yield improved clinical outcome measures for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome, with SN and SM being the dominant surgical treatments. Standardized outcome assessment and more nuanced patient evaluation are necessary to determine the most effective surgical treatments.

面部神经支配异常综合征的手术治疗:系统回顾
背景:面部反常神经再支配综合征的特征是面部神经损伤后面部肌肉反常神经再支配,产生面部同步运动、肌张力过高和肌肉痉挛。目的:系统回顾面神经反常再支配综合征的手术治疗方法:系统回顾面部反常神经再支配综合征的手术治疗方法,并通过患者报告结果、医生评分结果或计算机自动评分系统来评估其有效性。方法:根据 PRISMA 指南,我们使用 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 进行了系统性综述。我们纳入了 2003 年至 2023 年间报告任何面部神经支配异常综合征手术治疗结果的文献。结果:经过筛选,共纳入 25 项研究,731 名患者。手术方法包括选择性神经切除术(SN)、选择性肌切除术(SM)、交叉面神经移植术、咀嚼肌神经转移术和腓肠肌转移术。与基线相比,所有手术方法和组合至少有一项临床结果指标有显著改善(P < 0.05),但有一项研究发现没有显著改善。研究中使用了 30 种不同的结果测量方法,其中最常见的是 FaCE 和 eFACE 量表(各有 7 项研究)。结论:本综述中的所有手术方法都能改善面部神经支配异常综合征的临床疗效,其中SN和SM是最主要的手术治疗方法。要确定最有效的手术治疗方法,必须进行标准化的结果评估和更细致的患者评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
30.00%
发文量
159
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信