Team behaviour in interprofessional collaboration during trauma alerts: A critical incident study from the perspective of radiographers.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Marice Bäckström, Katarina Leijon-Sundqvist, Lise-Lott Lundvall, Karin Jonsson, Åsa Engström
{"title":"Team behaviour in interprofessional collaboration during trauma alerts: A critical incident study from the perspective of radiographers.","authors":"Marice Bäckström, Katarina Leijon-Sundqvist, Lise-Lott Lundvall, Karin Jonsson, Åsa Engström","doi":"10.1111/scs.13308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Challenges in mutual awareness in interprofessional collaboration (IPC) along with relational and cultural barriers among professionals disrupt flow and delay decision-making in trauma care. Thus, this study explores team behaviours within IPC in trauma teams during trauma alerts from the perspective of radiographers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative approach was used with a critical incident technique (CIT) design applying interviews with radiographers within three hospitals in Sweden from May 2022 to May 2023. CIT analysis was conducted with an abductive approach, applying an IPC core competency framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results present collaborative requirements in trauma care from radiographers' perspective narrating a distribution of team behaviours within trauma team collaboration and fundamental skills in IPC. Behaviours within interprofessional values and ethics were the most reported incidents related to valuing radiographers' contributions to IPC in acute trauma care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exploring behaviour through critical incidents associated with core competencies of IPC highlights the importance of interprofessional values as a foundation for successful IPC in the trauma team. The results show deficiencies in inclusive behaviour, influenced by the hierarchical environment of IPC. Power imbalances in this setting are traced to differences in perceived value and shared understanding among team members, possibly rooted in professional identity and culture. A dedicated leader is argued, as the recognition of radiographers' scope of practice in trauma imaging, emphasising the significance of shared decision-making.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The findings highlight organisational and relational coordination challenges for optimising competencies in IPC. IPC's success requires reinforcing values and ethics by empowering members' contributions and shared decision-making. This involves clarifying and recognising responsibilities, particularly for radiographers, ensuring their role in trauma imaging is respected and integrated into decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":48171,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Challenges in mutual awareness in interprofessional collaboration (IPC) along with relational and cultural barriers among professionals disrupt flow and delay decision-making in trauma care. Thus, this study explores team behaviours within IPC in trauma teams during trauma alerts from the perspective of radiographers.

Methods: A qualitative approach was used with a critical incident technique (CIT) design applying interviews with radiographers within three hospitals in Sweden from May 2022 to May 2023. CIT analysis was conducted with an abductive approach, applying an IPC core competency framework.

Results: The results present collaborative requirements in trauma care from radiographers' perspective narrating a distribution of team behaviours within trauma team collaboration and fundamental skills in IPC. Behaviours within interprofessional values and ethics were the most reported incidents related to valuing radiographers' contributions to IPC in acute trauma care.

Conclusion: Exploring behaviour through critical incidents associated with core competencies of IPC highlights the importance of interprofessional values as a foundation for successful IPC in the trauma team. The results show deficiencies in inclusive behaviour, influenced by the hierarchical environment of IPC. Power imbalances in this setting are traced to differences in perceived value and shared understanding among team members, possibly rooted in professional identity and culture. A dedicated leader is argued, as the recognition of radiographers' scope of practice in trauma imaging, emphasising the significance of shared decision-making.

Clinical implications: The findings highlight organisational and relational coordination challenges for optimising competencies in IPC. IPC's success requires reinforcing values and ethics by empowering members' contributions and shared decision-making. This involves clarifying and recognising responsibilities, particularly for radiographers, ensuring their role in trauma imaging is respected and integrated into decision-making.

创伤警报期间跨专业合作的团队行为:从放射技师的角度进行的重大事件研究。
导言:跨专业合作(IPC)中的相互认知挑战以及专业人员之间的关系和文化障碍会扰乱创伤护理的流程并延误决策。因此,本研究从放射技师的视角出发,探讨了创伤团队在创伤警报期间在IPC中的团队行为:方法:采用定性方法,运用关键事件技术(CIT)设计,在 2022 年 5 月至 2023 年 5 月期间对瑞典三家医院的放射技师进行访谈。采用归纳法对 CIT 进行分析,并应用 IPC 核心能力框架:结果:研究结果从放射技师的角度阐述了创伤护理中的协作要求,叙述了创伤团队协作中的团队行为分布以及 IPC 的基本技能。跨专业价值观和职业道德方面的行为是报告最多的与重视放射技师在急性创伤护理中对 IPC 所做贡献有关的事件:结论:通过与IPC核心能力相关的关键事件来探讨行为,突出了跨专业价值观作为创伤团队成功实施IPC的基础的重要性。研究结果表明,受 IPC 等级环境的影响,包容性行为存在缺陷。这种环境下的权力失衡可追溯到团队成员在感知价值和共同理解方面的差异,这可能源于专业身份和文化。专职领导者被认为是对放射技师创伤成像实践范围的认可,强调了共同决策的重要性:临床意义:研究结果凸显了组织和关系协调方面的挑战,以优化 IPC 的能力。IPC的成功需要通过增强成员的贡献和共同决策来强化价值观和道德观。这需要明确和确认责任,尤其是放射技师的责任,确保他们在创伤成像中的作用得到尊重并纳入决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is an established quarterly, peer reviewed Journal with an outstanding international reputation. As the official publication of the Nordic College of Caring Science, the Journal shares their mission to contribute to the development and advancement of scientific knowledge on caring related to health, well-being, illness and the alleviation of human suffering. The emphasis is on research that has a patient, family and community focus and which promotes an interdisciplinary team approach. Of special interest are scholarly articles addressing and initiating dialogue on theoretical, empirical and methodological concerns related to critical issues. All articles are expected to demonstrate respect for human dignity and accountability to society. In addition to original research the Journal also publishes reviews, meta-syntheses and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信