A review of the performance of urinary cytology with a focus on atypia, upper tract and updates on novel ancillary testing.

Q2 Medicine
Olisaemeka Chukwudebe, Elizabeth Lynch, Manish Vira, Louis Vaickus, Anam Khan, Rubina Shaheen Cocker
{"title":"A review of the performance of urinary cytology with a focus on atypia, upper tract and updates on novel ancillary testing.","authors":"Olisaemeka Chukwudebe, Elizabeth Lynch, Manish Vira, Louis Vaickus, Anam Khan, Rubina Shaheen Cocker","doi":"10.1016/j.jasc.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology (TPS) is remarkable for its high predictive value in the detection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma, especially of the bladder. However, universal compliance with TPS-recommended threshold for atypical call rates (15%) and TPS performance in the rarer upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC) are challenging. UTUC diagnosis is compounded by instrumentation artifacts, degenerative changes superimposed on an ambiguous cytology, difficult-to-access location, lack of specific standardized criteria, and a limited number of UTUC-focused studies. We reviewed TPS-applied studies published since 2022, noting up to 50%, exceeding the suggested 15% threshold for atypia. Our examination of ancillary tests for UTUC explored novel approaches including DNA methylation analysis, the detection of overexpressed tumor-linked messenger RNAs, and immunohistochemistry on markers such as CK17. Preliminary evidence from our review suggests that ancillary tests display superior performance over cytology, including in voided samples and low-grade urothelial carcinoma. Importantly, voided samples obviate the risks of ureterorenoscopy. Finally, we explored the future opportunities offered by artificial intelligence and machine learning for a more objective application of TPS criteria on urine samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":38262,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":"23-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2024.09.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology (TPS) is remarkable for its high predictive value in the detection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma, especially of the bladder. However, universal compliance with TPS-recommended threshold for atypical call rates (15%) and TPS performance in the rarer upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC) are challenging. UTUC diagnosis is compounded by instrumentation artifacts, degenerative changes superimposed on an ambiguous cytology, difficult-to-access location, lack of specific standardized criteria, and a limited number of UTUC-focused studies. We reviewed TPS-applied studies published since 2022, noting up to 50%, exceeding the suggested 15% threshold for atypia. Our examination of ancillary tests for UTUC explored novel approaches including DNA methylation analysis, the detection of overexpressed tumor-linked messenger RNAs, and immunohistochemistry on markers such as CK17. Preliminary evidence from our review suggests that ancillary tests display superior performance over cytology, including in voided samples and low-grade urothelial carcinoma. Importantly, voided samples obviate the risks of ureterorenoscopy. Finally, we explored the future opportunities offered by artificial intelligence and machine learning for a more objective application of TPS criteria on urine samples.

尿液细胞学检查回顾,重点是非典型性、上尿路和新型辅助检查的最新进展。
巴黎尿液细胞学报告系统(TPS)在检测高级别尿路上皮癌(尤其是膀胱癌)方面具有很高的预测价值。然而,要普遍遵守巴黎尿液细胞学报告系统推荐的非典型呼唤率阈值(15%)以及巴黎尿液细胞学报告系统在较罕见的上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)中的表现却很有挑战性。器械伪影、退行性病变叠加在模糊的细胞学上、难以触及的位置、缺乏特定的标准化标准以及以UTUC为重点的研究数量有限等因素使UTUC的诊断变得更加复杂。我们回顾了自2022年以来发表的应用TPS的研究,发现非典型率高达50%,超过了建议的15%阈值。我们对UTUC辅助检查的研究探索了一些新方法,包括DNA甲基化分析、肿瘤相关信使RNA过表达的检测以及CK17等标记物的免疫组化。我们审查的初步证据表明,辅助检测的效果优于细胞学检测,包括对排空样本和低级别尿路上皮癌的检测。重要的是,排空样本避免了输尿管镜检查的风险。最后,我们探讨了人工智能和机器学习在未来为更客观地应用尿液样本 TPS 标准提供的机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信