Frequency and factors associated with focused antenatal care in Guinea: Analysis of the DHS 2018.

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health in Africa Pub Date : 2024-10-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jphia.v15i1.505
Maimouna Baldé, Jean B D Loua, Tiany Sidibé, Fanta Barry, Bienvenu S Camara, Ramata Diallo, Madeleine Toure, Kaba S Keita, Sadan Camara, Mamadou D Balde
{"title":"Frequency and factors associated with focused antenatal care in Guinea: Analysis of the DHS 2018.","authors":"Maimouna Baldé, Jean B D Loua, Tiany Sidibé, Fanta Barry, Bienvenu S Camara, Ramata Diallo, Madeleine Toure, Kaba S Keita, Sadan Camara, Mamadou D Balde","doi":"10.4102/jphia.v15i1.505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Guinea, despite women's recourse to antenatal care (ANC), little remains known about the use of focused antenatal care (FANC), contained in the ANC package.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to analyse the frequency and factors associated with FANC, using data from the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) 2018.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted in Guinea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of data from the DHS conducted in 2018 in Guinea. It included all women who achieved at least one ANC visit in the last 2 years prior to the survey. Multivariate logistic regression was received to identify factors associated with FANC. Stata 16 software was used for the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study shows that in Guinea, between 2016 and 2018 only 33% of women undergoing ANC received a FANC. The most commonly used service was blood pressure measurement (93%), while the least commonly used service was deworming (42%). Factors associated with FANC were living in the Kindia region (odds ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-2.97); not intending to become pregnant for this pregnancy; belonging to a poor household; and having made 3, 4 or more ANC visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reports a low proportion of women receiving the full package of ANC.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>In order to improve this indicator, greater efforts need to be made in certain regions of the country to target pregnant women who achieve fewer ANC visits, carry pregnancies that were not intentional or belong to poorer households.</p>","PeriodicalId":44723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","volume":"15 1","pages":"505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v15i1.505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Guinea, despite women's recourse to antenatal care (ANC), little remains known about the use of focused antenatal care (FANC), contained in the ANC package.

Aim: The aim of this study was to analyse the frequency and factors associated with FANC, using data from the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) 2018.

Setting: This study was conducted in Guinea.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of data from the DHS conducted in 2018 in Guinea. It included all women who achieved at least one ANC visit in the last 2 years prior to the survey. Multivariate logistic regression was received to identify factors associated with FANC. Stata 16 software was used for the analysis.

Results: This study shows that in Guinea, between 2016 and 2018 only 33% of women undergoing ANC received a FANC. The most commonly used service was blood pressure measurement (93%), while the least commonly used service was deworming (42%). Factors associated with FANC were living in the Kindia region (odds ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-2.97); not intending to become pregnant for this pregnancy; belonging to a poor household; and having made 3, 4 or more ANC visits.

Conclusion: This study reports a low proportion of women receiving the full package of ANC.

Contribution: In order to improve this indicator, greater efforts need to be made in certain regions of the country to target pregnant women who achieve fewer ANC visits, carry pregnancies that were not intentional or belong to poorer households.

几内亚重点产前保健的频率和相关因素:2018年人口与健康调查分析。
背景:目的:本研究旨在利用2018年人口与健康调查(DHS)的数据,分析产前护理的频率和相关因素:本研究在几内亚进行:这是对 2018 年几内亚人口与健康调查数据的二次分析。研究对象包括调查前两年内至少接受过一次产前检查的所有妇女。采用多变量逻辑回归来确定与FANC相关的因素。分析使用了Stata 16软件:这项研究表明,在几内亚,2016年至2018年期间,只有33%的接受ANC的妇女接受了FANC。最常用的服务是测量血压(93%),而最不常用的服务是驱虫(42%)。与FANC相关的因素有:居住在金迪亚地区(几率比=1.7;95%置信区间:1.04-2.97);本次怀孕不打算怀孕;属于贫困家庭;接受过3次、4次或更多次产前检查:本研究报告显示,接受全套产前保健服务的妇女比例较低:为了改善这一指标,需要在该国的某些地区做出更大的努力,以那些接受产前护理次数较少、非故意怀孕或属于贫困家庭的孕妇为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health in Africa
Journal of Public Health in Africa PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health in Africa (JPHiA) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal that focuses on health issues in the African continent. The journal editors seek high quality original articles on public health related issues, reviews, comments and more. The aim of the journal is to move public health discourse from the background to the forefront. The success of Africa’s struggle against disease depends on public health approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信