{"title":"Fusarium spp. causing invasive disease in humans: A case series from north India.","authors":"Sudesh Gourav, Himanshu Mishra, Immaculata Xess, Ashu Seith Bhalla, Stuti Chandola, Sonakshi Gupta, Kavi Priya Appasami, Balaji Dattatraya Shukla, Sameer Bakhshi, Aish Manhas, Mragnayani Pandey, Bhaskar Rana, Gagandeep Singh","doi":"10.1093/mmy/myae111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Owing to their inherent resistance to different classes of antifungals, early identification of Fusarium spp. is crucial. In this study, 10 clinical isolates were included from patients with invasive fusariosis involving lungs, sinuses, or both. Clinico-radiological data were collected. Samples were processed by standard laboratory procedures. Three gene regions (ITS, TEF1, and RPB2) were amplified by PCR for multilocus sequencing. Fusarium MLST, FUSARIUM-ID, and FUSARIOID-ID databases were used for final identification. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution following CLSI M38-A3 and Sensititre™ YeastOne™ YO9 plate. Pulmonary involvement was seen in all patients, and sino-nasal involvement was present in six. Radiologically, consolidations and cavitations were present in eight and six cases, respectively. Halo sign was present in six; reverse halo sign was also found in three of them. Direct microscopy showed septate hyphae that were morphologically different from those found in aspergillosis. Results of the molecular identification were as follows: two Fusarium irregulare, one Fusarium pernambucanum, one Fusarium incarnatum, one Fusarium sp. FIESC 30, two Fusarium keratoplasticum, one Fusarium falciforme, one Fusarium pseudonygamai, and one Fusarium delphinoides. For both Fusarium solani (FSSC) and Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti (FIESC) species complexes, amphotericin B had the lowest minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Importantly, for terbinafine, all FIESC isolates had low MICs, while FSSC isolates had high MICs. In some cases, early identification of Fusarium spp. is possible by means of morphology of hyphae on direct microscopy and findings on radiology. Molecular identification, at least to the species complex level, is crucial for the choice of antifungals.</p>","PeriodicalId":18586,"journal":{"name":"Medical mycology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical mycology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myae111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Owing to their inherent resistance to different classes of antifungals, early identification of Fusarium spp. is crucial. In this study, 10 clinical isolates were included from patients with invasive fusariosis involving lungs, sinuses, or both. Clinico-radiological data were collected. Samples were processed by standard laboratory procedures. Three gene regions (ITS, TEF1, and RPB2) were amplified by PCR for multilocus sequencing. Fusarium MLST, FUSARIUM-ID, and FUSARIOID-ID databases were used for final identification. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution following CLSI M38-A3 and Sensititre™ YeastOne™ YO9 plate. Pulmonary involvement was seen in all patients, and sino-nasal involvement was present in six. Radiologically, consolidations and cavitations were present in eight and six cases, respectively. Halo sign was present in six; reverse halo sign was also found in three of them. Direct microscopy showed septate hyphae that were morphologically different from those found in aspergillosis. Results of the molecular identification were as follows: two Fusarium irregulare, one Fusarium pernambucanum, one Fusarium incarnatum, one Fusarium sp. FIESC 30, two Fusarium keratoplasticum, one Fusarium falciforme, one Fusarium pseudonygamai, and one Fusarium delphinoides. For both Fusarium solani (FSSC) and Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti (FIESC) species complexes, amphotericin B had the lowest minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Importantly, for terbinafine, all FIESC isolates had low MICs, while FSSC isolates had high MICs. In some cases, early identification of Fusarium spp. is possible by means of morphology of hyphae on direct microscopy and findings on radiology. Molecular identification, at least to the species complex level, is crucial for the choice of antifungals.
由于镰刀菌对不同种类的抗真菌药物具有固有的抗药性,因此及早识别镰刀菌属至关重要。在这项研究中,从肺部、鼻窦或两者均受累的侵袭性镰刀菌病患者中采集了 10 个临床分离株。收集了临床放射学数据。样本按标准实验室程序处理。通过 PCR 扩增三个基因区(ITS、TEF1 和 RPB2),进行多焦点测序。镰刀菌 MLST、FUSARIUM-ID 和 FUSARIOID-ID 数据库用于最终鉴定。根据 CLSI M38-A3 和 Sensititre™ YeastOne™ YO9 平板,采用肉汤微量稀释法进行抗真菌药敏试验。所有患者均出现肺部受累,6 名患者出现鼻窦受累。在放射学上,分别有 8 例和 6 例患者出现合并症和空洞。六例患者出现光晕征,其中三例患者出现反向光晕征。直接显微镜检查显示,有隔的菌丝在形态上与曲霉菌病的菌丝不同。分子鉴定结果如下:2 F. irregulare、1 F. pernambucanum、1 F. incarnatum、1 F. sp. FIESC 30、2 F. keratoplasticum、1 F. falciforme、1 F. pseudonygamai 和 1 F. delphinoides。对于茄科镰刀菌(FSSC)和镰刀菌(FIESC)菌种复合物,两性霉素 B 的最低抑菌浓度(MICs)最低。重要的是,对于特比萘芬,所有 FIESC 分离物的 MIC 值都很低,而 FSSC 分离物的 MIC 值都很高。在某些情况下,可以通过直接显微镜下的菌丝形态和放射学检查结果来早期识别镰刀菌属。分子鉴定至少要达到复合菌种水平,这对选择抗真菌药物至关重要。
期刊介绍:
Medical Mycology is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on original and innovative basic and applied studies, as well as learned reviews on all aspects of medical, veterinary and environmental mycology as related to disease. The objective is to present the highest quality scientific reports from throughout the world on divergent topics. These topics include the phylogeny of fungal pathogens, epidemiology and public health mycology themes, new approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of mycoses including clinical trials and guidelines, pharmacology and antifungal susceptibilities, changes in taxonomy, description of new or unusual fungi associated with human or animal disease, immunology of fungal infections, vaccinology for prevention of fungal infections, pathogenesis and virulence, and the molecular biology of pathogenic fungi in vitro and in vivo, including genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and proteomics. Case reports are no longer accepted. In addition, studies of natural products showing inhibitory activity against pathogenic fungi are not accepted without chemical characterization and identification of the compounds responsible for the inhibitory activity.