Walking economy and exercise efficiency in successful weight loss maintainers.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Seth A Creasy, Rebecca C Rosenberg, Danielle M Ostendorf, Ray Browning, Edward L Melanson, Zhaoxing Pan, Victoria A Catenacci
{"title":"Walking economy and exercise efficiency in successful weight loss maintainers.","authors":"Seth A Creasy, Rebecca C Rosenberg, Danielle M Ostendorf, Ray Browning, Edward L Melanson, Zhaoxing Pan, Victoria A Catenacci","doi":"10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Following short-term weight loss, the energetic cost of transport decreases and exercise efficiency increases. Whether changes persist during long-term weight maintenance is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared walking economy and exercise efficiency in weight loss maintainers (WLM, maintaining ≥13.6 kg weight loss for ≥1 year), controls without obesity (NC, BMI similar to current BMI of WLM), and controls with overweight/obesity (OC, BMI similar to pre-weight loss BMI of WLM). Energy expenditure (EE) and respiratory quotient were measured using indirect calorimetry at rest, while standing, and during treadmill walking. Gross and net energetic cost of transport (J/kg/m) was measured during level treadmill walking at 0.75, 1.12, and 1.52 m/s. Gross, net, and delta efficiency (%) were measured during inclined treadmill walking (2 %, 4 %, and 6 % grade) and a constant speed (1.12 m/s).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WLM (n = 32, BMI: 23.8 ± 2.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and NC (n = 28, BMI: 22.7 ± 1.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) had significantly lower EE (kJ/min) compared to OC (n = 26, BMI: 33.0 ± 4.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) during rest, standing, and walking (p < 0.01). Net energetic cost of transport was significantly lower in WLM compared to OC at 1.12 and 1.52 m/s (p < 0.05). Net efficiency was significantly greater in WLM compared to OC while walking (p ≤ 0.05). There were no significant differences between WLM and NC for any measures of economy or efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WLM had lower walking economy and greater walking efficiency compared to OC, but there were no differences between WLM and NC. Thus, individuals maintaining significant weight loss may be successful with long-term weight loss, in part, due to resistance against adaptive reductions in walking energetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Following short-term weight loss, the energetic cost of transport decreases and exercise efficiency increases. Whether changes persist during long-term weight maintenance is unknown.

Methods: We compared walking economy and exercise efficiency in weight loss maintainers (WLM, maintaining ≥13.6 kg weight loss for ≥1 year), controls without obesity (NC, BMI similar to current BMI of WLM), and controls with overweight/obesity (OC, BMI similar to pre-weight loss BMI of WLM). Energy expenditure (EE) and respiratory quotient were measured using indirect calorimetry at rest, while standing, and during treadmill walking. Gross and net energetic cost of transport (J/kg/m) was measured during level treadmill walking at 0.75, 1.12, and 1.52 m/s. Gross, net, and delta efficiency (%) were measured during inclined treadmill walking (2 %, 4 %, and 6 % grade) and a constant speed (1.12 m/s).

Results: WLM (n = 32, BMI: 23.8 ± 2.3 kg/m2) and NC (n = 28, BMI: 22.7 ± 1.6 kg/m2) had significantly lower EE (kJ/min) compared to OC (n = 26, BMI: 33.0 ± 4.5 kg/m2) during rest, standing, and walking (p < 0.01). Net energetic cost of transport was significantly lower in WLM compared to OC at 1.12 and 1.52 m/s (p < 0.05). Net efficiency was significantly greater in WLM compared to OC while walking (p ≤ 0.05). There were no significant differences between WLM and NC for any measures of economy or efficiency.

Conclusion: WLM had lower walking economy and greater walking efficiency compared to OC, but there were no differences between WLM and NC. Thus, individuals maintaining significant weight loss may be successful with long-term weight loss, in part, due to resistance against adaptive reductions in walking energetics.

成功减肥者的步行经济性和运动效率。
目的:短期减肥后,运输的能量成本会降低,运动效率会提高。这些变化在长期体重维持过程中是否会持续,目前尚不清楚:我们比较了体重减轻维持者(WLM,体重减轻≥13.6 千克且维持≥1 年)、无肥胖对照组(NC,BMI 与 WLM 目前的 BMI 相似)和超重/肥胖对照组(OC,BMI 与 WLM 减重前的 BMI 相似)的步行经济性和运动效率。能量消耗(EE)和呼吸商是在休息、站立和跑步机行走时使用间接热量计测量的。以 0.75、1.12 和 1.52 米/秒的速度在水平跑步机上行走时,测量了运输的总能量成本和净能量成本(J/kg/m)。在倾斜跑步机上行走(坡度为 2%、4% 和 6%)和匀速(1.12 米/秒)时,测量了总效率、净效率和三角效率(%):结果:WLM(n=32,BMI:23.8±2.3 kg/m2)和 NC(n=28,BMI:22.7±1.6 kg/m2)与 OC(n=26,BMI:33.0±4.5 kg/m2)相比,在休息、站立和行走时的 EE(kJ/min)明显较低(p 结论:WLM 的行走经济性较低,而 NC 的行走经济性较高:与 OC 相比,WLM 的步行经济性更低,步行效率更高,但 WLM 和 NC 之间没有差异。因此,保持体重大幅下降的人之所以能成功实现长期减肥,部分原因是他们能够抵御步行能量的适应性降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信