Ling Zhang, Shuai Fan, Xuan Zhao, Ye Luo, Bin Cai, Shao-Bai Wang
{"title":"The effect of manipulation under anesthesia on knee kinematics in individuals with arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.","authors":"Ling Zhang, Shuai Fan, Xuan Zhao, Ye Luo, Bin Cai, Shao-Bai Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05159-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) has been recommended for refractory arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the effectiveness of MUA to restore normal kinematics of the arthrofibrotic knee is still unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics in six degrees-of-freedom (6DOF) in patients with arthrofibrosis before and after MUA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Computed tomography and dual fluoroscopic imaging system were used to assess in vivo knee kinematics. Ten patients (6 women and 4 men; 32.6 ± 6.5y, 168.4 ± 7.8 cm, 61.8 ± 13.2 kg) were included in this study. The tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics in 6DOF were collected before and one year after MUA. A simple analysis of variance was used to evaluate kinematic data of preoperative arthrofibrotic knee, postoperative arthrofibrotic knee, and the contralateral knee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patella in the postoperative arthrofibrotic knee shifted significantly more inferiorly compared to the preoperative knee at 45° (P = 0.010), 60° (P = 0.008), and 75° (P = 0.049) of flexion. The patellar flexion in the postoperative arthrofibrotic knee significantly increased at 45° (P = 0.048), 60° (P = 0.037), and 75° (P = 0.006) of flexion compared to the preoperative arthrofibrotic knee. The patellar tilt was significantly decreased at 60° (P = 0.006) and at 75° (P = 0.037) of knee flexion in the postoperative arthrofibrotic knee compared to the contralateral knee. MUA significantly increased tibial internal rotation angle in the arthrofibrotic knee at 45° (P = 0.047), at 60° (P = 0.033), and at 75° (P = 0.021) of knee flexion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MUA could restore normal patellar inferior shift, flexion, and tibial rotation compared to the contralateral side. However, the MUA could not restore normal patellar tilt of the arthrofibrotic knee. This indicated that improvement of patellar tilt should be emphasized in postoperative rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05159-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) has been recommended for refractory arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the effectiveness of MUA to restore normal kinematics of the arthrofibrotic knee is still unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics in six degrees-of-freedom (6DOF) in patients with arthrofibrosis before and after MUA.
Methods: Computed tomography and dual fluoroscopic imaging system were used to assess in vivo knee kinematics. Ten patients (6 women and 4 men; 32.6 ± 6.5y, 168.4 ± 7.8 cm, 61.8 ± 13.2 kg) were included in this study. The tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics in 6DOF were collected before and one year after MUA. A simple analysis of variance was used to evaluate kinematic data of preoperative arthrofibrotic knee, postoperative arthrofibrotic knee, and the contralateral knee.
Results: The patella in the postoperative arthrofibrotic knee shifted significantly more inferiorly compared to the preoperative knee at 45° (P = 0.010), 60° (P = 0.008), and 75° (P = 0.049) of flexion. The patellar flexion in the postoperative arthrofibrotic knee significantly increased at 45° (P = 0.048), 60° (P = 0.037), and 75° (P = 0.006) of flexion compared to the preoperative arthrofibrotic knee. The patellar tilt was significantly decreased at 60° (P = 0.006) and at 75° (P = 0.037) of knee flexion in the postoperative arthrofibrotic knee compared to the contralateral knee. MUA significantly increased tibial internal rotation angle in the arthrofibrotic knee at 45° (P = 0.047), at 60° (P = 0.033), and at 75° (P = 0.021) of knee flexion.
Conclusions: MUA could restore normal patellar inferior shift, flexion, and tibial rotation compared to the contralateral side. However, the MUA could not restore normal patellar tilt of the arthrofibrotic knee. This indicated that improvement of patellar tilt should be emphasized in postoperative rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.