Objective assessment of docking site consolidation in bone transport: the role of pixel value ratio in predicting healing outcomes.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Xin Yang, Yimurang Hamiti, Kai Liu, Sulong Wang, Xiriaili Kadier, Debin Xiong, Aihemaitijang Yusufu
{"title":"Objective assessment of docking site consolidation in bone transport: the role of pixel value ratio in predicting healing outcomes.","authors":"Xin Yang, Yimurang Hamiti, Kai Liu, Sulong Wang, Xiriaili Kadier, Debin Xiong, Aihemaitijang Yusufu","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05200-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of docking site healing in bone transport remains a significant challenge in orthopedic surgery. Traditional assessment methods rely heavily on qualitative radiographic evaluations. This study investigates the utility of pixel value ratio (PVR), an objective quantitative measure, in assessing bone healing at the docking site during bone transport.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 47 patients who underwent bone transport for lower limb reconstruction between January 2015 and January 2020. Patients were categorized into bone union (n = 35) and nonunion (n = 12) groups based on docking site outcomes. PVR was calculated using two methods (PVR1 and PVR2) at six time points over 24 months post-docking. Subgroup analyses were performed based on gender, age, and surgical site.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 47 patients, 35 achieved bone union and 12 experienced nonunion. Both PVR1 and PVR2 were consistently lower in the union group compared to the nonunion group at all time points (p < 0.001). In the union group, PVR1 ranged from 1.064 ± 0.050 to 1.108 ± 0.062, while PVR2 ranged from 0.926 ± 0.079 to 0.946 ± 0.062. In the nonunion group, PVR1 ranged from 1.204 ± 0.057 to 1.273 ± 0.020, and PVR2 from 1.039 ± 0.060 to 1.148 ± 0.022. Subgroup analyses revealed that males had significantly lower PVR values compared to females, and tibial cases had lower PVR values compared to femoral cases in both union and nonunion groups (p < 0.05). All juvenile patients achieved union, compared to 71.4% of adults (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PVR demonstrates significant potential as an objective tool for assessing docking site healing in bone transport procedures. The distinct patterns observed between union and nonunion cases provide a foundation for developing clinical guidelines to monitor and predict healing outcomes. Integration of PVR assessment into clinical practice could improve decision-making and optimize treatment protocols in bone transport procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05200-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The management of docking site healing in bone transport remains a significant challenge in orthopedic surgery. Traditional assessment methods rely heavily on qualitative radiographic evaluations. This study investigates the utility of pixel value ratio (PVR), an objective quantitative measure, in assessing bone healing at the docking site during bone transport.

Methods: This retrospective study included 47 patients who underwent bone transport for lower limb reconstruction between January 2015 and January 2020. Patients were categorized into bone union (n = 35) and nonunion (n = 12) groups based on docking site outcomes. PVR was calculated using two methods (PVR1 and PVR2) at six time points over 24 months post-docking. Subgroup analyses were performed based on gender, age, and surgical site.

Results: Of 47 patients, 35 achieved bone union and 12 experienced nonunion. Both PVR1 and PVR2 were consistently lower in the union group compared to the nonunion group at all time points (p < 0.001). In the union group, PVR1 ranged from 1.064 ± 0.050 to 1.108 ± 0.062, while PVR2 ranged from 0.926 ± 0.079 to 0.946 ± 0.062. In the nonunion group, PVR1 ranged from 1.204 ± 0.057 to 1.273 ± 0.020, and PVR2 from 1.039 ± 0.060 to 1.148 ± 0.022. Subgroup analyses revealed that males had significantly lower PVR values compared to females, and tibial cases had lower PVR values compared to femoral cases in both union and nonunion groups (p < 0.05). All juvenile patients achieved union, compared to 71.4% of adults (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: PVR demonstrates significant potential as an objective tool for assessing docking site healing in bone transport procedures. The distinct patterns observed between union and nonunion cases provide a foundation for developing clinical guidelines to monitor and predict healing outcomes. Integration of PVR assessment into clinical practice could improve decision-making and optimize treatment protocols in bone transport procedures.

客观评估骨搬运中对接部位的巩固情况:像素值比率在预测愈合结果中的作用。
背景:骨转运对接部位愈合的管理仍然是骨科手术中的一项重大挑战。传统的评估方法在很大程度上依赖于定性的放射学评估。本研究探讨了像素值比(PVR)这一客观定量指标在评估骨转运过程中对接部位骨愈合的实用性:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月期间因下肢重建而接受骨转运的 47 例患者。根据对接部位的结果,将患者分为骨结合组(35 例)和非骨结合组(12 例)。在对接后 24 个月内的六个时间点,使用两种方法(PVR1 和 PVR2)计算 PVR。根据性别、年龄和手术部位进行了分组分析:结果:在 47 名患者中,35 人实现了骨结合,12 人经历了骨不结合。在所有时间点上,骨结合组的 PVR1 和 PVR2 均低于非骨结合组(P 结论:PVR1 和 PVR2 是骨结合的重要潜在指标:PVR 作为评估骨转运过程中对接部位愈合情况的客观工具具有很大的潜力。在接合和未接合病例之间观察到的不同模式为制定临床指南以监测和预测愈合结果奠定了基础。将 PVR 评估纳入临床实践可改善骨转运手术的决策并优化治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信