Periodontal and peri-implant bleeding on probing in patients undergoing supportive maintenance: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.1 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Clinical Oral Investigations Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1007/s00784-024-06030-5

Antares Outatzis, Katrin Nickles, Hari Petsos, Peter Eickholz

{"title":"Periodontal and peri-implant bleeding on probing in patients undergoing supportive maintenance: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Antares Outatzis, Katrin Nickles, Hari Petsos, Peter Eickholz","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-06030-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Assessment of periodontal and peri-implant inflammation, evidenced by bleeding on probing (BOP), among partially dentate patients receiving supportive periodontal care (SPC).Material & methods: Patient charts from the Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine of Goethe-University Frankfurt with at least one dental implant were reviewed. Measurements included probing pocket depth (PPD), BOP, and full-mouth bleeding and plaque scores for all teeth and implants.Results: 100 patients (median; lower/upper quartile: age 68.9; 62.6/76.5 years; 51 females, 6 smokers, 16 with anticoagulative medication, 6 localized stage III, 57 generalized stage III, 37 stage IV, 70 grade B, 30 Grade C, 22; 20/25 teeth left, 2; 1/4 implants) were examined. Peri-implant BOP (24; 11.5/41.5%) was significantly higher than BOP at teeth (14; 8/21.5%) (p < 0.001). A median of 0 (0/1) implants exhibited no BOP and 0 (0/1) only one site with BOP. Shallow pockets (PPD 1-3 mm) were significantly more frequent in teeth (93; 87/97%) than in implants (72.5; 58/94.5%; p < 0.001). Moderately deep pockets (PPD 4 and 5 mm) were less frequent in teeth compared to implants (6; 2/11%; 22; 5.5/33%; p < 0.001).Conclusions: Peri-implant sites exhibit a higher prevalence of BOP compared to periodontal sites in SPC patients.Clinical relevance: Practitioners providing supportive periodontal care to patients with dental implants should anticipate a greater prevalence of BOP around implants compared to teeth.","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"28 12","pages":"633"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06030-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Assessment of periodontal and peri-implant inflammation, evidenced by bleeding on probing (BOP), among partially dentate patients receiving supportive periodontal care (SPC).

Material & methods: Patient charts from the Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine of Goethe-University Frankfurt with at least one dental implant were reviewed. Measurements included probing pocket depth (PPD), BOP, and full-mouth bleeding and plaque scores for all teeth and implants.

Results: 100 patients (median; lower/upper quartile: age 68.9; 62.6/76.5 years; 51 females, 6 smokers, 16 with anticoagulative medication, 6 localized stage III, 57 generalized stage III, 37 stage IV, 70 grade B, 30 Grade C, 22; 20/25 teeth left, 2; 1/4 implants) were examined. Peri-implant BOP (24; 11.5/41.5%) was significantly higher than BOP at teeth (14; 8/21.5%) (p < 0.001). A median of 0 (0/1) implants exhibited no BOP and 0 (0/1) only one site with BOP. Shallow pockets (PPD 1-3 mm) were significantly more frequent in teeth (93; 87/97%) than in implants (72.5; 58/94.5%; p < 0.001). Moderately deep pockets (PPD 4 and 5 mm) were less frequent in teeth compared to implants (6; 2/11%; 22; 5.5/33%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Peri-implant sites exhibit a higher prevalence of BOP compared to periodontal sites in SPC patients.

Clinical relevance: Practitioners providing supportive periodontal care to patients with dental implants should anticipate a greater prevalence of BOP around implants compared to teeth.

查看原文本刊更多论文

接受支持性维护的患者探诊时牙周和种植体周围出血：一项横断面研究。

摘要通过探诊出血（BOP）评估接受支持性牙周护理（SPC）的半口无牙患者的牙周和种植体周围炎症：材料与方法：研究人员查阅了法兰克福歌德大学牙科与口腔医学中心的患者病历，这些患者至少有一颗种植牙。测量项目包括所有牙齿和种植体的探诊袋深度（PPD）、BOP、全口出血和牙菌斑评分：共检查了 100 名患者（中位数；下四分位数/上四分位数：年龄 68.9 岁；62.6 岁/76.5 岁；51 名女性，6 名吸烟者，16 名服用抗凝药物，6 名局部 III 期，57 名全身 III 期，37 名 IV 期，70 名 B 级，30 名 C 级，22 名；20/25 名留有牙齿，2 名；1/4 名种植体）。种植体周围的 BOP（24；11.5/41.5%）明显高于牙齿处的 BOP（14；8/21.5%）（P 结论：种植体周围的 BOP 比牙齿处的 BOP 高：与牙周部位相比，SPC 患者种植体周围部位的 BOP 患病率更高：临床意义：为牙科种植体患者提供支持性牙周护理的医生应预计，与牙齿相比，种植体周围的 BOP 发生率更高。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

5.90%

发文量

484

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.