The Effect of Low-Dose CT Protocols on Shoulder Model-Based Tracking accuracy Using Biplane Videoradiography.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Stacey Chen, Erin C S Lee, Kelby B Napier, Michael J Rainbow, Rebekah L Lawrence
{"title":"The Effect of Low-Dose CT Protocols on Shoulder Model-Based Tracking accuracy Using Biplane Videoradiography.","authors":"Stacey Chen, Erin C S Lee, Kelby B Napier, Michael J Rainbow, Rebekah L Lawrence","doi":"10.1007/s10439-024-03645-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Model-based tracking is being increasingly used to quantify shoulder kinematics and typically employs computed tomography (CT) to create the 3D bone volumes, which adds to the total radiation exposure. Lower-dose CT protocols may be possible given the contrast between bone and the surrounding soft tissues. The purpose of this study was to describe the dose-accuracy tradeoff between low-dose CT scans and the kinematic tracking accuracy of the humerus, scapula, and clavicle when tracked using an intensity-based registration algorithm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three fresh-frozen cadavers consisting of the torso and bilateral shoulders were tested. The CT protocols investigated included a full-dose protocol and 4 experimental low-dose protocols that modulated x-ray tube current and peak voltage. Bead-based tracking (i.e., radiostereometric analysis) served as the reference standard to which model-based tracking results were compared. Accuracy was described in terms of both segmental (humerus, scapula, and clavicle) and joint (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular) kinematics using root-mean-square (RMSE), bias, precision, and worst-case errors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The low-dose CT scans resulted in an average dose reduction of 70.6-92.8%. RMSEs tended to increase as CT dose decreased with average glenohumeral errors increasing from 0.5° and 0.6 mm to 0.6° and 0.6 mm between the highest and lowest-dose protocols, and average acromioclavicular errors increasing from 0.6° and 0.8 mm to 0.7° and 0.9 mm. However, the difference in joint kinematic errors between the highest and lowest-dose CT scanning protocols was generally small (≤0.3°, ≤ 0.1 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is possible to substantially reduce the CT dose associated with shoulder motion analysis using biplane videoradiography without significantly impacting data fidelity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-024-03645-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Model-based tracking is being increasingly used to quantify shoulder kinematics and typically employs computed tomography (CT) to create the 3D bone volumes, which adds to the total radiation exposure. Lower-dose CT protocols may be possible given the contrast between bone and the surrounding soft tissues. The purpose of this study was to describe the dose-accuracy tradeoff between low-dose CT scans and the kinematic tracking accuracy of the humerus, scapula, and clavicle when tracked using an intensity-based registration algorithm.

Methods: Three fresh-frozen cadavers consisting of the torso and bilateral shoulders were tested. The CT protocols investigated included a full-dose protocol and 4 experimental low-dose protocols that modulated x-ray tube current and peak voltage. Bead-based tracking (i.e., radiostereometric analysis) served as the reference standard to which model-based tracking results were compared. Accuracy was described in terms of both segmental (humerus, scapula, and clavicle) and joint (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular) kinematics using root-mean-square (RMSE), bias, precision, and worst-case errors.

Results: The low-dose CT scans resulted in an average dose reduction of 70.6-92.8%. RMSEs tended to increase as CT dose decreased with average glenohumeral errors increasing from 0.5° and 0.6 mm to 0.6° and 0.6 mm between the highest and lowest-dose protocols, and average acromioclavicular errors increasing from 0.6° and 0.8 mm to 0.7° and 0.9 mm. However, the difference in joint kinematic errors between the highest and lowest-dose CT scanning protocols was generally small (≤0.3°, ≤ 0.1 mm).

Conclusion: It is possible to substantially reduce the CT dose associated with shoulder motion analysis using biplane videoradiography without significantly impacting data fidelity.

低剂量 CT 方案对使用双平面视频放射摄影基于肩部模型的追踪准确性的影响。
目的:基于模型的跟踪越来越多地用于量化肩关节运动学,通常采用计算机断层扫描(CT)来创建三维骨骼体积,这增加了总辐射量。鉴于骨骼与周围软组织之间的对比度,降低 CT 方案剂量是可能的。本研究旨在描述低剂量 CT 扫描与使用基于强度的注册算法跟踪肱骨、肩胛骨和锁骨时的运动学跟踪精度之间的剂量-精度权衡:测试了三具新鲜冷冻尸体,包括躯干和双侧肩膀。研究的 CT 方案包括一个全剂量方案和 4 个实验性低剂量方案,这些方案对 X 射线管电流和峰值电压进行了调节。基于磁珠的跟踪(即放射性立体计量分析)作为参考标准,与基于模型的跟踪结果进行比较。使用均方根(RMSE)、偏差、精确度和最坏情况误差对节段(肱骨、肩胛骨和锁骨)和关节(盂肱关节、肩锁关节)运动学的准确性进行了描述:低剂量 CT 扫描的平均剂量减少了 70.6%-92.8%。随着CT剂量的降低,RMSE呈上升趋势,在最高剂量和最低剂量方案之间,平均盂肱关节误差从0.5°和0.6 mm增加到0.6°和0.6 mm,平均肩锁关节误差从0.6°和0.8 mm增加到0.7°和0.9 mm。然而,最高剂量和最低剂量CT扫描方案之间的关节运动学误差差异普遍较小(≤0.3°,≤0.1 mm):结论:使用双平面视频放射成像技术可大幅降低肩关节运动分析的 CT 剂量,而不会对数据的保真度产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信