The Current Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Detection of Its Complications: A Systematic Review.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.73134
Muhammad Yasir Younis, Muhammad Usman Khan, Usman Khan, Talal Latif Khan, Hassan Mukarram, Kanav Jain, Insha Ilyas, Wachi Jain
{"title":"The Current Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Detection of Its Complications: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Muhammad Yasir Younis, Muhammad Usman Khan, Usman Khan, Talal Latif Khan, Hassan Mukarram, Kanav Jain, Insha Ilyas, Wachi Jain","doi":"10.7759/cureus.73134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) encompasses complex gastrointestinal (GI) conditions, primarily Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), requiring precise imaging for effective diagnosis and management of complications. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current role of imaging modalities in diagnosing IBD and detecting related complications. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed a literature search using text words and controlled vocabulary applying Boolean operators \"AND,\" \"OR,\" with various combinations on databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The search targeted open-access articles involving humans, with full-text available, and published in the English Language from 2005 to 2024. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias (RoB) checklist. Our search process identified 127 records from Cochrane (39), Embase (29), and PubMed (59). After removing 98 irrelevant records, 29 underwent further screening. Five were excluded as they involved irrelevant problems or outcomes, leaving us with 24 reports with full text, all of which were accessible. Following the eligibility assessment, two more reports were excluded due to inaccessibility, and 22 studies were included in the final analysis. The risk of bias and methodological quality assessment revealed that out of 22 studies analyzed, five (23%) had a high risk of bias, while 13 (59%) were classified as moderate risk, and four (18%) showed low risk. This distribution highlights a predominance of moderate-risk studies in research on imaging in IBD, emphasizing the need for enhanced study designs in future investigations. Our findings revealed the varying effectiveness of imaging modalities in diagnosing complications of CD and UC. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) stands out as the preferred method for CD due to its high sensitivity and noninvasive nature. In contrast, colonoscopy remains the gold standard for UC, providing direct visualization of mucosal lesions. While techniques like ultrasound and capsule endoscopy offer valuable insights, they have limitations that may affect their utility in certain cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.73134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) encompasses complex gastrointestinal (GI) conditions, primarily Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), requiring precise imaging for effective diagnosis and management of complications. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current role of imaging modalities in diagnosing IBD and detecting related complications. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed a literature search using text words and controlled vocabulary applying Boolean operators "AND," "OR," with various combinations on databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The search targeted open-access articles involving humans, with full-text available, and published in the English Language from 2005 to 2024. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias (RoB) checklist. Our search process identified 127 records from Cochrane (39), Embase (29), and PubMed (59). After removing 98 irrelevant records, 29 underwent further screening. Five were excluded as they involved irrelevant problems or outcomes, leaving us with 24 reports with full text, all of which were accessible. Following the eligibility assessment, two more reports were excluded due to inaccessibility, and 22 studies were included in the final analysis. The risk of bias and methodological quality assessment revealed that out of 22 studies analyzed, five (23%) had a high risk of bias, while 13 (59%) were classified as moderate risk, and four (18%) showed low risk. This distribution highlights a predominance of moderate-risk studies in research on imaging in IBD, emphasizing the need for enhanced study designs in future investigations. Our findings revealed the varying effectiveness of imaging modalities in diagnosing complications of CD and UC. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) stands out as the preferred method for CD due to its high sensitivity and noninvasive nature. In contrast, colonoscopy remains the gold standard for UC, providing direct visualization of mucosal lesions. While techniques like ultrasound and capsule endoscopy offer valuable insights, they have limitations that may affect their utility in certain cases.

目前影像学在炎症性肠病诊断和并发症检测中的作用:系统回顾
炎症性肠病(IBD)包括复杂的胃肠道(GI)疾病,主要是克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC),需要精确的成像来进行有效诊断和处理并发症。本系统性综述旨在评估目前成像模式在诊断 IBD 和检测相关并发症方面的作用。该综述遵循了系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 等数据库中使用文本词和控制词汇,应用布尔运算符 "AND"、"OR "和各种组合进行了文献检索。搜索对象为 2005 年至 2024 年期间用英语发表的涉及人类、全文可用的开放存取文章。纳入研究的质量采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险 (RoB) 检查表进行评估。我们的搜索过程从 Cochrane(39 篇)、Embase(29 篇)和 PubMed(59 篇)中发现了 127 条记录。在删除了 98 条无关记录后,有 29 条记录接受了进一步筛选。其中 5 条因涉及不相关的问题或结果而被排除,剩下的 24 条报告均有全文,且均可查阅。在进行资格评估后,又有两份报告因无法查阅而被排除,最终有 22 项研究被纳入最终分析。偏倚风险和方法质量评估显示,在分析的 22 项研究中,5 项(23%)存在高偏倚风险,13 项(59%)被归类为中度风险,4 项(18%)为低风险。这种分布突出表明,在有关 IBD 影像学的研究中,中度风险的研究居多,这强调了在未来的调查中加强研究设计的必要性。我们的研究结果表明,影像学模式在诊断 CD 和 UC 并发症方面的效果各不相同。磁共振肠造影(MRE)因其高灵敏度和无创性而成为 CD 的首选方法。相比之下,结肠镜检查仍是 UC 的黄金标准,可直接观察粘膜病变。虽然超声波和胶囊内镜等技术能提供有价值的见解,但它们也有局限性,可能会影响其在某些病例中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信