Validation of the CRAVE-C scale in Chinese adults: a four-study examination of competing motivations for physical activity versus rest.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1467949
Zhihui Cheng, Alyx Taylor, Matthew A Stults-Kolehmainen, Markus Gerber, Fabian Herold, Michael Ross, Garrett Ash, Arthur F Kramer, Mengxian Zhao
{"title":"Validation of the CRAVE-C scale in Chinese adults: a four-study examination of competing motivations for physical activity versus rest.","authors":"Zhihui Cheng, Alyx Taylor, Matthew A Stults-Kolehmainen, Markus Gerber, Fabian Herold, Michael Ross, Garrett Ash, Arthur F Kramer, Mengxian Zhao","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1467949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study aimed to validate the Cravings for Rest and Volitional Energy Expenditure (CRAVE) scale among Chinese adults with different health conditions (healthy control, chronic illnesses, and psychiatric disorders) and skill levels (athletes vs. non-athletes).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Study 1, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using the Maximum Likelihood Method (MLM) was performed on a Chinese sample of emerging adults (<i>N</i> = 481) to evaluate the structural validity of the Cravings for Rest and Volitional Energy Expenditure-Chinese version (CRAVE-C). In Study 2, differences in \"Move\" and \"Rest\" desires were examined among patients with psychiatric disorders, patients with chronic illnesses, and healthy controls. In study 3, investigated the relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise motivation using the CRAVE-C (<i>N</i> = 83). In Study 4, the changes in \"Move\" desire from baseline to post-training were compared between athletes and non-athletes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from Study 1 indicated that the 10-item CRAVE-C showed good fit indices ( <i>Chi<sup>2</sup></i> (34) = 118.769, <i>CFI</i>  = 0.95, <i>TLI</i> = 0.934, <i>SRMR</i> = 0.053, <i>RMSEA</i> = 0.072). \"Move\" positively correlated with various factors of the Affective Exercise Experiences Questionnaire-Chinese and the Physical Effort Scale-Chinese, while \"Rest\" correlated negatively. In Study 2, Patients with psychiatric disorders had a significantly higher \"Move\" desire than healthy controls. Patients with chronic illnesses had a significantly higher \"Rest\" desire than healthy controls. In Study 3, higher cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with a slight increase in \"Move\" desire (3.26% ± 37.35%) and a decrease in \"Rest\" desire (18.94% ± 66.99%). Lower fitness was linked to a significant decline in \"Move\" desire (-54.61% ± 111.33%) and an increase in \"Rest\" desire (43.62% ± 63.64%). In Study 4, the athlete group demonstrated a significant increase in \"Move\" desire from baseline to post-training, whereas the non-athlete group reported a significant decrease in \"Move\" desire from baseline to post-training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 10-item CRAVE-C has good reliability and validity in the Chinese cultural context and can be used among Chinese adults with different health conditions and skill levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1467949","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to validate the Cravings for Rest and Volitional Energy Expenditure (CRAVE) scale among Chinese adults with different health conditions (healthy control, chronic illnesses, and psychiatric disorders) and skill levels (athletes vs. non-athletes).

Methods: In Study 1, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using the Maximum Likelihood Method (MLM) was performed on a Chinese sample of emerging adults (N = 481) to evaluate the structural validity of the Cravings for Rest and Volitional Energy Expenditure-Chinese version (CRAVE-C). In Study 2, differences in "Move" and "Rest" desires were examined among patients with psychiatric disorders, patients with chronic illnesses, and healthy controls. In study 3, investigated the relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise motivation using the CRAVE-C (N = 83). In Study 4, the changes in "Move" desire from baseline to post-training were compared between athletes and non-athletes.

Results: Results from Study 1 indicated that the 10-item CRAVE-C showed good fit indices ( Chi2 (34) = 118.769, CFI  = 0.95, TLI = 0.934, SRMR = 0.053, RMSEA = 0.072). "Move" positively correlated with various factors of the Affective Exercise Experiences Questionnaire-Chinese and the Physical Effort Scale-Chinese, while "Rest" correlated negatively. In Study 2, Patients with psychiatric disorders had a significantly higher "Move" desire than healthy controls. Patients with chronic illnesses had a significantly higher "Rest" desire than healthy controls. In Study 3, higher cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with a slight increase in "Move" desire (3.26% ± 37.35%) and a decrease in "Rest" desire (18.94% ± 66.99%). Lower fitness was linked to a significant decline in "Move" desire (-54.61% ± 111.33%) and an increase in "Rest" desire (43.62% ± 63.64%). In Study 4, the athlete group demonstrated a significant increase in "Move" desire from baseline to post-training, whereas the non-athlete group reported a significant decrease in "Move" desire from baseline to post-training.

Conclusion: The 10-item CRAVE-C has good reliability and validity in the Chinese cultural context and can be used among Chinese adults with different health conditions and skill levels.

CRAVE-C量表在中国成年人中的验证:对体育锻炼与休息的竞争动机的四项研究。
研究背景本研究的目的是在不同健康状况(健康控制、慢性疾病和精神障碍)和技能水平(运动员与非运动员)的中国成年人中验证对休息和自愿能量消耗(CRAVE)的渴望量表:在研究 1 中,采用最大似然法(MLM)对中国新兴成人样本(N = 481)进行了确证因子分析(CFA),以评估《对休息和体能消耗的渴望--中文版》(CRAVE-C)的结构效度。在研究 2 中,考察了精神障碍患者、慢性病患者和健康对照组在 "移动 "和 "休息 "欲望上的差异。研究 3 采用 CRAVE-C 调查了心肺功能与运动动机之间的关系(83 人)。研究 4 比较了运动员和非运动员从基线到训练后 "移动 "欲望的变化:研究 1 的结果表明,10 个项目的 CRAVE-C 显示出良好的拟合指数(Chi2 (34) = 118.769,CFI = 0.95,TLI = 0.934,SRMR = 0.053,RMSEA = 0.072)。运动 "与 "中国人运动情感体验问卷 "和 "中国人体力努力量表 "的各因子呈正相关,而 "休息 "则呈负相关。在研究 2 中,精神疾病患者的 "运动 "欲望明显高于健康对照组。慢性病患者的 "休息 "欲望明显高于健康对照组。在研究 3 中,较高的心肺功能与 "运动 "欲望的轻微上升(3.26% ± 37.35%)和 "休息 "欲望的下降(18.94% ± 66.99%)有关。体能较低与 "移动 "欲望的显著下降(-54.61% ± 111.33%)和 "休息 "欲望的上升(43.62% ± 63.64%)有关。在研究 4 中,从基线到训练后,运动员组的 "运动 "欲望显著增加,而非运动员组的 "运动 "欲望从基线到训练后显著下降:10个项目的CRAVE-C在中国文化背景下具有良好的信度和效度,可用于不同健康状况和技能水平的中国成年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信