The impact of scaling and root planning combined with mouthwash during pregnancy on preterm birth and low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
May Salama, Abdullah Al-Taiar, Denise C McKinney, Estiar Rahman, Anwar T Merchant
{"title":"The impact of scaling and root planning combined with mouthwash during pregnancy on preterm birth and low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"May Salama, Abdullah Al-Taiar, Denise C McKinney, Estiar Rahman, Anwar T Merchant","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06905-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of treating periodontal disease (PD) during pregnancy on adverse birth outcomes, such as preterm birth (PTB) and/or low birth weight (LBW), remains unclear. This is partially due to the fact that Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) have used different combinations of treatment approaches to test this hypothesis. In this meta-analysis of RCTs, we assessed the impact of treating PD during pregnancy with scaling and root planning (SRP) and mouthwash use on PTB and LBW.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy was employed across electronic databases, including PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effect models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 133 initially identified reports, 9 RCTs involving 3,985 pregnant women met the inclusion criteria. Periodontal treatment with SRP and mouthwash use in pregnancy was associated with a lower risk of PTB and LBW in meta-analysis with random effects models (pooled RR for PTB = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.88) and (pooled RR for LBW = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.13-0.84). Substantial heterogeneity was observed among studies (I<sup>2</sup> = 91% and 90% for PTB and LBW, respectively), with sensitivity analysis suggesting potential sources of heterogeneity. Funnel plot assessment for publication bias showed evidence of asymmetry.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SRP with mouthwash use during pregnancy were associated with significantly lower risks of PTB and LBW. Larger, well-conducted RCTs are warranted to address this issue, as existing trials are small and exhibit methodological and statistical heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06905-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effect of treating periodontal disease (PD) during pregnancy on adverse birth outcomes, such as preterm birth (PTB) and/or low birth weight (LBW), remains unclear. This is partially due to the fact that Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) have used different combinations of treatment approaches to test this hypothesis. In this meta-analysis of RCTs, we assessed the impact of treating PD during pregnancy with scaling and root planning (SRP) and mouthwash use on PTB and LBW.

Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy was employed across electronic databases, including PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effect models.

Results: Out of 133 initially identified reports, 9 RCTs involving 3,985 pregnant women met the inclusion criteria. Periodontal treatment with SRP and mouthwash use in pregnancy was associated with a lower risk of PTB and LBW in meta-analysis with random effects models (pooled RR for PTB = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.88) and (pooled RR for LBW = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.13-0.84). Substantial heterogeneity was observed among studies (I2 = 91% and 90% for PTB and LBW, respectively), with sensitivity analysis suggesting potential sources of heterogeneity. Funnel plot assessment for publication bias showed evidence of asymmetry.

Conclusion: SRP with mouthwash use during pregnancy were associated with significantly lower risks of PTB and LBW. Larger, well-conducted RCTs are warranted to address this issue, as existing trials are small and exhibit methodological and statistical heterogeneity.

孕期洗牙和根部规划结合漱口水对早产和低出生体重的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:治疗孕期牙周病(PD)对早产(PTB)和/或低出生体重(LBW)等不良出生结果的影响仍不明确。部分原因是随机对照试验(RCT)使用了不同的治疗方法组合来验证这一假设。在这项随机对照试验的荟萃分析中,我们评估了在怀孕期间使用洗牙和牙根规划(SRP)以及漱口水治疗牙周病对小儿麻痹症和低出生体重的影响:我们按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。在电子数据库(包括 PubMed/Medline、Embase 和 Google Scholar)中采用了全面的检索策略。采用 Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 工具进行质量评估。采用随机效应模型计算汇总风险比(RRs)和 95% 置信区间(CIs):在初步确定的 133 篇报告中,有 9 篇涉及 3985 名孕妇的 RCT 符合纳入标准。在随机效应模型的荟萃分析中,孕期使用SRP和漱口水进行牙周治疗与较低的PTB和LBW风险有关(PTB的汇总RR=0.44,95% CI:0.22-0.88)和(LBW的汇总RR=0.33,95% CI:0.13-0.84)。研究之间存在很大的异质性(PTB 和 LBW 的 I2 分别为 91% 和 90%),敏感性分析表明存在潜在的异质性来源。针对发表偏倚的漏斗图评估显示出不对称的证据:结论:孕期使用漱口水的SRP与PTB和LBW风险显著降低相关。由于现有的试验规模较小,且在方法学和统计学上存在异质性,因此需要进行更大规模的、开展良好的 RCT 研究来解决这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信