Risk Factors for Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infection in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Tian Chen, Jianhua Yu, Qi Mu, Ruibo Wu, Qi Chang, Jin Ye, Chao Qian
{"title":"Risk Factors for Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infection in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.","authors":"Tian Chen, Jianhua Yu, Qi Mu, Ruibo Wu, Qi Chang, Jin Ye, Chao Qian","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the distribution of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms (MDROs) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and to identify risk factors for MDRO infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients hospitalized with DFUs were enrolled, and ulcer swabs were cultured for bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Hematology and blood biochemistry were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 228 patients hospitalized with DFUs were enrolled. Out of 150 patients with positive cultures, 123 (82%) were infected with single strains, whereas 27 (18%) had mixed infections. Out of the 177 bacterial strains isolated, 78 (44%) were MDROs. Among the top 5 most common bacteria, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Proteus exhibited MDR rates of 92%, 56%, and 55%, respectively. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter cloacae had low MDR rates of 5% and 8%, respectively. Single variable logistic regression analysis showed that neutrophil percent (NEU%), creatinine, C-reactive protein, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were risk factors for MDRO infection, whereas hemoglobin and albumin levels were protective factors. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that NEU% and FPG were independent risk factors for MDRO infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A high percentage of the infections in patients with DFUs were caused by MDROs. To reduce MDRO infections in high-risk patients, it is important to use antibiotics rationally, improve patients' FPG levels and nutritional status, and strengthen hospital sterilization processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"70 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to analyze the distribution of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms (MDROs) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and to identify risk factors for MDRO infections.

Methods: Patients hospitalized with DFUs were enrolled, and ulcer swabs were cultured for bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Hematology and blood biochemistry were also assessed.

Results: A total of 228 patients hospitalized with DFUs were enrolled. Out of 150 patients with positive cultures, 123 (82%) were infected with single strains, whereas 27 (18%) had mixed infections. Out of the 177 bacterial strains isolated, 78 (44%) were MDROs. Among the top 5 most common bacteria, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Proteus exhibited MDR rates of 92%, 56%, and 55%, respectively. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter cloacae had low MDR rates of 5% and 8%, respectively. Single variable logistic regression analysis showed that neutrophil percent (NEU%), creatinine, C-reactive protein, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were risk factors for MDRO infection, whereas hemoglobin and albumin levels were protective factors. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that NEU% and FPG were independent risk factors for MDRO infection.

Conclusions: A high percentage of the infections in patients with DFUs were caused by MDROs. To reduce MDRO infections in high-risk patients, it is important to use antibiotics rationally, improve patients' FPG levels and nutritional status, and strengthen hospital sterilization processes.

糖尿病足溃疡耐多药细菌感染的风险因素
背景:本研究旨在分析糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)患者体内耐多药(MDR)菌(MDRO)的分布情况,并确定MDRO感染的风险因素:方法:对糖尿病足溃疡住院患者进行登记,并对溃疡拭子进行细菌鉴定和抗生素敏感性测试。此外,还对血液学和血液生化学进行了评估:结果:共登记了 228 名住院的 DFU 患者。在培养阳性的 150 名患者中,123 人(82%)感染的是单一菌株,27 人(18%)为混合感染。在分离出的 177 株细菌中,78 株(44%)是 MDRO。在最常见的前 5 种细菌中,凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和变形杆菌的耐药率分别为 92%、56% 和 55%。铜绿假单胞菌和泄殖腔肠杆菌的 MDR 率较低,分别为 5%和 8%。单变量逻辑回归分析显示,中性粒细胞百分比(NEU%)、肌酐、C反应蛋白和空腹血浆葡萄糖(FPG)是MDRO感染的危险因素,而血红蛋白和白蛋白水平则是保护因素。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,NEU%和FPG是MDRO感染的独立风险因素:结论:DFU 患者的感染有很高比例是由 MDRO 引起的。为减少高危患者的 MDRO 感染,合理使用抗生素、改善患者的 FPG 水平和营养状况以及加强医院消毒流程非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信