Short-term mortality among very elderly cancer patients in the intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database

IF 2.2 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Aging Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1002/agm2.12358
Taotao Liu, Runyu Ding
{"title":"Short-term mortality among very elderly cancer patients in the intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database","authors":"Taotao Liu,&nbsp;Runyu Ding","doi":"10.1002/agm2.12358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study is to examine the epidemiological characteristics of very elderly patients (aged over 80 years) with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and to elucidate the association between Acute Physiology Score III (APS-III) and 28-day mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective analysis was conducted using data extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Patients aged 80 years and above were assigned to three groups: non-cancer group, non-metastatic cancer group, and metastatic cancer group, based on their cancer diagnosis and its extent, Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed among these patient groups. Furthermore, patients were divided into a survival group and a non-survival group based on their 28-day survival status after ICU admission. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to detect the risk factors for 28-day mortality among these patients. Additionally, this investigation sought to establish a dose–response relationship by exploring the graded association between APS-III scores and the 28-day mortalities among patients diagnosed with cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 42,037 medical records were screened, from which 11,461 elderly patients aged over 80 years were included, comprising 1020 (8.90%) with non-metastatic cancer, 537 (4.68%) with metastatic cancer, and 9904 (86.41%) without cancer. Significant differences in 28-day mortality were observed between both the non-metastatic and metastatic cancer groups compared to the non-cancer group (20.98% and 22.35% vs. 15.75%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). However, no statistically significant difference was detected in the 28-day mortality rate when comparing the non-metastatic cancer group directly with the metastatic cancer group (20.98% vs. 22.35%, <i>p</i> = 0.576). Univariate analysis revealed significant differences (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) in age, gender, BMI, aCCI excluding cancer point, ventilation, presence of cancer, and status of metastatic cancer between the survival and non-survival groups. In the multivariate logistic regression, the odds ratio (OR) for ventilation was found to be 2.154 (95% CI: 1.799–2.578), cancer conferred an OR of 1.499 (95% CI: 1.137–1.975), metastatic cancer showed an OR of 1.171 (95% CI: 0.745–1.841), APS-III showed an OR of 1.038 (95% CI: 1.034–1.042). A dose–response relationship was observed, demonstrating that when the APS-III score exceeded 80 points, the 28-day mortality rate surpassed 50% among the very elderly cancer patients in ICU.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>More than one-tenth of critically ill very elderly patients admitted to the ICU are diagnosed with cancer. Among ICU patients, those with cancer face a short-term mortality risk approximately 1.5 times higher than those without a cancer diagnosis. Interestingly, while our findings do not indicate an escalated mortality risk due to metastasis within the cancer patient cohort, the presence of cancer itself remains a significant factor influencing ICU mortality rates in this very elderly population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":32862,"journal":{"name":"Aging Medicine","volume":"7 5","pages":"580-587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agm2.12358","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agm2.12358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study is to examine the epidemiological characteristics of very elderly patients (aged over 80 years) with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and to elucidate the association between Acute Physiology Score III (APS-III) and 28-day mortality.

Method

A retrospective analysis was conducted using data extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Patients aged 80 years and above were assigned to three groups: non-cancer group, non-metastatic cancer group, and metastatic cancer group, based on their cancer diagnosis and its extent, Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed among these patient groups. Furthermore, patients were divided into a survival group and a non-survival group based on their 28-day survival status after ICU admission. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to detect the risk factors for 28-day mortality among these patients. Additionally, this investigation sought to establish a dose–response relationship by exploring the graded association between APS-III scores and the 28-day mortalities among patients diagnosed with cancer.

Results

A total of 42,037 medical records were screened, from which 11,461 elderly patients aged over 80 years were included, comprising 1020 (8.90%) with non-metastatic cancer, 537 (4.68%) with metastatic cancer, and 9904 (86.41%) without cancer. Significant differences in 28-day mortality were observed between both the non-metastatic and metastatic cancer groups compared to the non-cancer group (20.98% and 22.35% vs. 15.75%, p < 0.001). However, no statistically significant difference was detected in the 28-day mortality rate when comparing the non-metastatic cancer group directly with the metastatic cancer group (20.98% vs. 22.35%, p = 0.576). Univariate analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.001) in age, gender, BMI, aCCI excluding cancer point, ventilation, presence of cancer, and status of metastatic cancer between the survival and non-survival groups. In the multivariate logistic regression, the odds ratio (OR) for ventilation was found to be 2.154 (95% CI: 1.799–2.578), cancer conferred an OR of 1.499 (95% CI: 1.137–1.975), metastatic cancer showed an OR of 1.171 (95% CI: 0.745–1.841), APS-III showed an OR of 1.038 (95% CI: 1.034–1.042). A dose–response relationship was observed, demonstrating that when the APS-III score exceeded 80 points, the 28-day mortality rate surpassed 50% among the very elderly cancer patients in ICU.

Conclusions

More than one-tenth of critically ill very elderly patients admitted to the ICU are diagnosed with cancer. Among ICU patients, those with cancer face a short-term mortality risk approximately 1.5 times higher than those without a cancer diagnosis. Interestingly, while our findings do not indicate an escalated mortality risk due to metastasis within the cancer patient cohort, the presence of cancer itself remains a significant factor influencing ICU mortality rates in this very elderly population.

Abstract Image

重症监护室中高龄癌症患者的短期死亡率:基于重症监护医学信息市场 IV 数据库的回顾性队列研究
目的 本研究旨在探讨入住重症监护病房(ICU)的高龄癌症患者(80 岁以上)的流行病学特征,并阐明急性生理学评分 III(APS-III)与 28 天死亡率之间的关系。 方法 采用从重症监护医学信息市场第四版(MIMIC-IV)数据库中提取的数据进行回顾性分析。根据癌症的诊断和程度,将 80 岁及以上的患者分为三组:非癌症组、非转移性癌症组和转移性癌症组。此外,还根据患者入住重症监护室后 28 天的生存状况将其分为生存组和非生存组。通过单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来检测这些患者 28 天死亡率的风险因素。此外,这项研究还试图通过探讨 APS-III 评分与癌症患者 28 天死亡率之间的分级关系来建立剂量-反应关系。 结果 共筛查了 42,037 份病历,其中包括 11,461 名 80 岁以上的老年患者,包括 1020 名(8.90%)非转移性癌症患者、537 名(4.68%)转移性癌症患者和 9904 名(86.41%)非癌症患者。与非癌症组相比,非转移性癌症组和转移性癌症组的 28 天死亡率均有显著差异(20.98% 和 22.35% 对 15.75%,p <0.001)。然而,如果将非转移性癌症组与转移性癌症组直接进行比较,则在 28 天死亡率方面没有发现明显的统计学差异(20.98% vs. 22.35%,p = 0.576)。单变量分析显示,存活组和非存活组在年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、aCCI(不包括癌症点)、通气量、是否患有癌症以及转移性癌症状况方面存在显著差异(p <0.001)。在多变量逻辑回归中发现,通气的几率比(OR)为 2.154(95% CI:1.799-2.578),癌症的几率比为 1.499(95% CI:1.137-1.975),转移性癌症的几率比为 1.171(95% CI:0.745-1.841),APS-III 的几率比为 1.038(95% CI:1.034-1.042)。观察到的剂量-反应关系表明,当 APS-III 评分超过 80 分时,重症监护室中高龄癌症患者的 28 天死亡率超过 50%。 结论 在入住重症监护室的重症高龄患者中,有十分之一以上被确诊患有癌症。在重症监护室患者中,癌症患者的短期死亡风险比未确诊癌症的患者高出约 1.5 倍。有趣的是,虽然我们的研究结果并未表明癌症患者群中因转移而导致的死亡风险升高,但癌症本身仍然是影响这一高龄人群在重症监护室死亡率的一个重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aging Medicine
Aging Medicine Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信