Advanced Biofuel Value Chains Sourced by New Cropping Systems With Low iLUC Risk

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Andrea Parenti, Walter Zegada-Lizarazu, Karla Dussan, Ana M. López-Contreras, Truus de Vrije, Igor Staritsky, Berien Elbersen, Bert Annevelink, Fulvio Di Fulvio, Katja Oehmichen, Niels Dögnitz, Andrea Monti
{"title":"Advanced Biofuel Value Chains Sourced by New Cropping Systems With Low iLUC Risk","authors":"Andrea Parenti,&nbsp;Walter Zegada-Lizarazu,&nbsp;Karla Dussan,&nbsp;Ana M. López-Contreras,&nbsp;Truus de Vrije,&nbsp;Igor Staritsky,&nbsp;Berien Elbersen,&nbsp;Bert Annevelink,&nbsp;Fulvio Di Fulvio,&nbsp;Katja Oehmichen,&nbsp;Niels Dögnitz,&nbsp;Andrea Monti","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Increasing lignocellulosic feedstock for advanced biofuels can tackle the decarbonization of the transport sector. Dedicated biomass produced alongside food systems with low indirect land use change (iLUC) impact can broaden the feedstock availability, thus streamlining the supply chains. The objective of this study was the design and evaluation of advanced ethanol value chains for the Emilia-Romagna region based on low iLUC feedstock. Two dedicated lignocellulosic crops (biomass sorghum and sunn hemp) were evaluated in double cropping systems alongside food crop residues (corn stover and wheat straw) as sources to simulate the value chains. A parcel-level regional analysis was carried out, then the LocaGIStics2.0 model was used for the spatial design and review of the biomass delivery chain options regarding cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the different feedstock mixes. Literature data on bioethanol production from similar feedstocks were used to estimate yields, process costs, and GHG emissions of a biorefinery process based on these biomasses. Within the chain options, GHG emissions were overly sensitive to cultivation input, mostly N-fertilization. This considered, GHG emissions resulted similar across different feedstock with straw/stover (averaging 13 g CO<sub>2</sub>eq MJ<sup>−1</sup> fuel), sunn hemp (14 g CO<sub>2</sub>eq MJ<sup>−1</sup> fuel), and biomass sorghum (16 g CO<sub>2</sub>eq MJ<sup>−1</sup> fuel). On the other hand, the bioethanol produced from biomass sorghum (608 € Mg<sup>−1</sup> of bioethanol) was cheaper compared with straw (632 € Mg<sup>−1</sup>), sunn hemp (672 € Mg<sup>−1</sup>), and stover (710 € Mg<sup>−1</sup>). The bioethanol cost ranged from 0.0017 to 0.020 € MJ<sup>−1</sup> fuel depending on the feedstock, with operations and maintenance impacting up to 90% of the final cost. In summary, a single bioethanol plant with an annual capacity of 250,000 Mg of biomass could replace from 5% to 7% of the Emilia-Romagna's ethanol fuel consumption, depending on the applied sourcing scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing lignocellulosic feedstock for advanced biofuels can tackle the decarbonization of the transport sector. Dedicated biomass produced alongside food systems with low indirect land use change (iLUC) impact can broaden the feedstock availability, thus streamlining the supply chains. The objective of this study was the design and evaluation of advanced ethanol value chains for the Emilia-Romagna region based on low iLUC feedstock. Two dedicated lignocellulosic crops (biomass sorghum and sunn hemp) were evaluated in double cropping systems alongside food crop residues (corn stover and wheat straw) as sources to simulate the value chains. A parcel-level regional analysis was carried out, then the LocaGIStics2.0 model was used for the spatial design and review of the biomass delivery chain options regarding cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the different feedstock mixes. Literature data on bioethanol production from similar feedstocks were used to estimate yields, process costs, and GHG emissions of a biorefinery process based on these biomasses. Within the chain options, GHG emissions were overly sensitive to cultivation input, mostly N-fertilization. This considered, GHG emissions resulted similar across different feedstock with straw/stover (averaging 13 g CO2eq MJ−1 fuel), sunn hemp (14 g CO2eq MJ−1 fuel), and biomass sorghum (16 g CO2eq MJ−1 fuel). On the other hand, the bioethanol produced from biomass sorghum (608 € Mg−1 of bioethanol) was cheaper compared with straw (632 € Mg−1), sunn hemp (672 € Mg−1), and stover (710 € Mg−1). The bioethanol cost ranged from 0.0017 to 0.020 € MJ−1 fuel depending on the feedstock, with operations and maintenance impacting up to 90% of the final cost. In summary, a single bioethanol plant with an annual capacity of 250,000 Mg of biomass could replace from 5% to 7% of the Emilia-Romagna's ethanol fuel consumption, depending on the applied sourcing scenario.

Abstract Image

由 iLUC 风险低的新型种植系统提供的先进生物燃料价值链
增加先进生物燃料的木质纤维素原料可以解决运输部门的脱碳问题。与间接土地利用变化(iLUC)影响较小的粮食系统一起生产的专用生物质可扩大原料供应,从而简化供应链。本研究的目标是设计和评估艾米利亚-罗马涅地区基于低间接土地利用变化(iLUC)原料的先进乙醇价值链。在双季种植系统中,评估了两种专用木质纤维素作物(生物质高粱和苘麻)以及粮食作物秸秆(玉米秸秆和小麦秸秆),作为模拟价值链的来源。首先进行地块级区域分析,然后使用 LocaGIStics2.0 模型进行空间设计,并就不同原料组合的成本和温室气体(GHG)排放量对生物质输送链方案进行审查。使用类似原料生产生物乙醇的文献数据来估算基于这些生物质的生物精炼工艺的产量、工艺成本和温室气体排放量。在产业链选项中,温室气体排放对种植投入(主要是氮肥)过于敏感。考虑到这一点,秸秆/秸秆(平均 13 克 CO2eq MJ-1 燃料)、苘麻(14 克 CO2eq MJ-1 燃料)和生物质高粱(16 克 CO2eq MJ-1 燃料)等不同原料的温室气体排放量相似。另一方面,生物质高粱生产的生物乙醇(608 欧元 Mg-1 生物乙醇)比秸秆(632 欧元 Mg-1)、苘麻(672 欧元 Mg-1)和秸秆(710 欧元 Mg-1)便宜。根据原料的不同,生物乙醇的成本从 0.0017 到 0.020 欧元 MJ-1 燃料不等,操作和维护对最终成本的影响高达 90%。总之,一家年产 25 万毫克生物质的生物乙醇工厂可以取代艾米利亚-罗马涅地区 5%至 7%的乙醇燃料消耗,具体取决于所采用的原料来源方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信