Evaluating progress towards implementation of the European HTA Regulation: Insights generated from the European Access Academy's multi-stakeholder survey
Francine Brinkhuis , Jörg Ruof , Hendrika van den Ham , Fabrizio Gianfrate , Valentina Strammiello , Michael Berntgen , Mira Pavlovic , Peter Mol , Jürgen Wasem , Walter Van Dyck , Antonella Cardone , Christian Dierks , Anja Schiel , Oriol Solà-Morales , Wim Goettsch , Elaine Julian
{"title":"Evaluating progress towards implementation of the European HTA Regulation: Insights generated from the European Access Academy's multi-stakeholder survey","authors":"Francine Brinkhuis , Jörg Ruof , Hendrika van den Ham , Fabrizio Gianfrate , Valentina Strammiello , Michael Berntgen , Mira Pavlovic , Peter Mol , Jürgen Wasem , Walter Van Dyck , Antonella Cardone , Christian Dierks , Anja Schiel , Oriol Solà-Morales , Wim Goettsch , Elaine Julian","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We conducted a multi-stakeholder survey to assess stakeholders' perceptions of the progress made towards the implementation of the European Regulation on Health Technology Assessment (EU HTA R) and to identify and prioritize the remaining challenges for implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using two iterative Delphi cycles, an exploratory, semi-quantitative survey was developed to identify how stakeholders 1) experienced preparatory activities of the Regulation, and 2) prioritized remaining challenges for successful implementation. The survey was distributed among the network of the European Access Academy and via social media to ensure coverage of key stakeholders. Descriptive analyses were performed on quantitative response items, and relative importance was calculated for ranking items. Free-text responses supplemented participants' answers to quantitative questions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>N = 61 responses were received from N = 15 countries including Global/ EU-wide institutions (Patients and Patients’ representatives: 7; Clinicians’ representatives: 5; Regulators: 3; Health Technology Developers (HTDs): 20; HTA bodies: 10; Payers: 7; Policy Makers: 2; Academic representatives: 7). The majority of respondents were aware of preparatory activities, with 74 % (N = 45) observing the drafting of Guidance Documents and 64 % (N = 39) noting the establishment of the Coordination Group. Respondents ranked the success of preparatory activities neutral with a slight tendency towards a positive ranking. Key challenges were Member States' readiness for Joint Clinical Assessments, HTA capacity/ capability constraints, and the applicability/ feasibility of the methodological framework.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study identified the key remaining challenges for the successful establishment of the EU HTA process. Key findings emphasize the readiness of national systems and procedures as pivotal factors. Balancing operational efficiency with strategic objectives, including the development of a European Value Framework, is imperative for harnessing the full potential of the joint HTA process and enhancing patient access to innovative technologies on a pan-European scale.</div></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><div>In January 2022, the European Union (EU) adopted the European Regulation on Health Technology Assessment (HTA). By harmonizing HTA practices and promoting collaboration across Member States, the joint procedure as set out in the regulation aims to improve efficient use of resources and ensure long-term sustainability of EU-wide HTA cooperation. Close to reaching the half-way mark of the preparation phase in mid-2023, we conducted a multi-stakeholder survey to assess perceptions of the progress made towards implementation of a joint procedure and to prioritize remaining challenges. The responses indicated a neutral to positive perception of the preparatory activities (i.e., establishing a coordination group and a stakeholder network, and creating guidance documents). Respondents prioritized challenges related to the readiness of Member States, limitations in HTA capacity and capability, and applicability of the assessment methods. Further research is needed to define targeted strategies for specific stakeholder groups to effectively address the identified challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 5","pages":"Article 100930"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000935","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
We conducted a multi-stakeholder survey to assess stakeholders' perceptions of the progress made towards the implementation of the European Regulation on Health Technology Assessment (EU HTA R) and to identify and prioritize the remaining challenges for implementation.
Methods
Using two iterative Delphi cycles, an exploratory, semi-quantitative survey was developed to identify how stakeholders 1) experienced preparatory activities of the Regulation, and 2) prioritized remaining challenges for successful implementation. The survey was distributed among the network of the European Access Academy and via social media to ensure coverage of key stakeholders. Descriptive analyses were performed on quantitative response items, and relative importance was calculated for ranking items. Free-text responses supplemented participants' answers to quantitative questions.
Results
N = 61 responses were received from N = 15 countries including Global/ EU-wide institutions (Patients and Patients’ representatives: 7; Clinicians’ representatives: 5; Regulators: 3; Health Technology Developers (HTDs): 20; HTA bodies: 10; Payers: 7; Policy Makers: 2; Academic representatives: 7). The majority of respondents were aware of preparatory activities, with 74 % (N = 45) observing the drafting of Guidance Documents and 64 % (N = 39) noting the establishment of the Coordination Group. Respondents ranked the success of preparatory activities neutral with a slight tendency towards a positive ranking. Key challenges were Member States' readiness for Joint Clinical Assessments, HTA capacity/ capability constraints, and the applicability/ feasibility of the methodological framework.
Conclusions
This study identified the key remaining challenges for the successful establishment of the EU HTA process. Key findings emphasize the readiness of national systems and procedures as pivotal factors. Balancing operational efficiency with strategic objectives, including the development of a European Value Framework, is imperative for harnessing the full potential of the joint HTA process and enhancing patient access to innovative technologies on a pan-European scale.
Public interest summary
In January 2022, the European Union (EU) adopted the European Regulation on Health Technology Assessment (HTA). By harmonizing HTA practices and promoting collaboration across Member States, the joint procedure as set out in the regulation aims to improve efficient use of resources and ensure long-term sustainability of EU-wide HTA cooperation. Close to reaching the half-way mark of the preparation phase in mid-2023, we conducted a multi-stakeholder survey to assess perceptions of the progress made towards implementation of a joint procedure and to prioritize remaining challenges. The responses indicated a neutral to positive perception of the preparatory activities (i.e., establishing a coordination group and a stakeholder network, and creating guidance documents). Respondents prioritized challenges related to the readiness of Member States, limitations in HTA capacity and capability, and applicability of the assessment methods. Further research is needed to define targeted strategies for specific stakeholder groups to effectively address the identified challenges.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics