Blind peroneal artery outflow bypass for limb salvage in patients with severe CLTI: A case series

Jorge Rey MD, Karen Manzur-Pineda MD, Christopher Montoya MD, Stefan Kenel-Pierre MD, Naixin Kang MD, Kathy Gonzalez MD, Arash Bornak MD
{"title":"Blind peroneal artery outflow bypass for limb salvage in patients with severe CLTI: A case series","authors":"Jorge Rey MD,&nbsp;Karen Manzur-Pineda MD,&nbsp;Christopher Montoya MD,&nbsp;Stefan Kenel-Pierre MD,&nbsp;Naixin Kang MD,&nbsp;Kathy Gonzalez MD,&nbsp;Arash Bornak MD","doi":"10.1016/j.avsurg.2024.100342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Limb loss carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Multiple medical and surgical strategies have been studied to address complications and lower amputation rates, especially in patients with poor outflow in the infrageniculate arteries. Our case series highlights the use of the peroneal bypass without angiographic runoff but acceptable intraoperative back-bleed as an option for patients with CLTI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-center retrospective review was performed on adult patients who underwent lower extremity bypass using the peroneal artery as the outflow for CLTI from 2012 to 2022. Two subgroups were classified as blind peroneal arteries and non-blind peroneal arteries, according to the Darling et al.'s 1998 classification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of twenty-five patients with lower extremity bypass for CLTI with the peroneal artery as the outflow target were included. From those, seventeen were classified as non-blind and eight were defined as blind peroneal, according to preoperative angiography runoff. Blind peroneal bypass primary patency rate was 45%, primary-assisted was 60%, and secondary was 60%, with a limb loss rate of 25.0%. Among the seventeen non-blind peroneal bypasses, primary patency was 64.5%, primary assisted was 77%, and secondary was 77%, with a limb loss rate of 5.9%. There were no significantly different p-values observed between both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Blind peroneal bypasses serve as a last resort strategy to attempt limb salvage before amputation if adequate back-bleed is observed intraoperatively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72235,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772687824000941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Limb loss carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Multiple medical and surgical strategies have been studied to address complications and lower amputation rates, especially in patients with poor outflow in the infrageniculate arteries. Our case series highlights the use of the peroneal bypass without angiographic runoff but acceptable intraoperative back-bleed as an option for patients with CLTI.

Methods

A single-center retrospective review was performed on adult patients who underwent lower extremity bypass using the peroneal artery as the outflow for CLTI from 2012 to 2022. Two subgroups were classified as blind peroneal arteries and non-blind peroneal arteries, according to the Darling et al.'s 1998 classification.

Results

A total of twenty-five patients with lower extremity bypass for CLTI with the peroneal artery as the outflow target were included. From those, seventeen were classified as non-blind and eight were defined as blind peroneal, according to preoperative angiography runoff. Blind peroneal bypass primary patency rate was 45%, primary-assisted was 60%, and secondary was 60%, with a limb loss rate of 25.0%. Among the seventeen non-blind peroneal bypasses, primary patency was 64.5%, primary assisted was 77%, and secondary was 77%, with a limb loss rate of 5.9%. There were no significantly different p-values observed between both groups.

Conclusion

Blind peroneal bypasses serve as a last resort strategy to attempt limb salvage before amputation if adequate back-bleed is observed intraoperatively.
为重度 CLTI 患者进行腓动脉外流盲旁路手术以挽救肢体:一个病例系列
目的慢性肢体缺血(CLTI)患者肢体缺失具有很高的发病率和死亡率。为了解决并发症和降低截肢率,人们研究了多种药物和手术策略,尤其是对于胫下动脉外流不畅的患者。我们的病例系列强调了腓肠肌旁路术作为CLTI患者的一种选择,不会出现血管造影径流,但可接受术中反出血。方法对2012年至2022年期间接受下肢旁路术的成人患者进行了单中心回顾性研究,这些患者均使用腓肠肌动脉作为CLTI的流出道。根据 Darling 等人 1998 年的分类方法,将患者分为腓动脉盲区和腓动脉非盲区两个亚组。根据术前血管造影结果,其中 17 例被归类为非盲腓动脉,8 例被定义为盲腓动脉。盲腓肠搭桥的初次通畅率为 45%,初次辅助通畅率为 60%,二次通畅率为 60%,肢体缺失率为 25.0%。在 17 例非盲人腓肠搭桥术中,主要通畅率为 64.5%,主要辅助通畅率为 77%,辅助通畅率为 77%,肢体缺失率为 5.9%。结论如果术中观察到足够的背部出血,盲腓肠搭桥是截肢前尝试挽救肢体的最后手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
62 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信