Top-down: A better strategy for incremental covering array generation

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Yan Wang , Xintao Niu , Huayao Wu , Changhai Nie , Lei Yu , Xiaoyin Wang , Jiaxi Xu
{"title":"Top-down: A better strategy for incremental covering array generation","authors":"Yan Wang ,&nbsp;Xintao Niu ,&nbsp;Huayao Wu ,&nbsp;Changhai Nie ,&nbsp;Lei Yu ,&nbsp;Xiaoyin Wang ,&nbsp;Jiaxi Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><div>The Incremental Covering Array (ICA) offers a flexible and efficient test schedule for Combinatorial Testing (CT) by enabling dynamic adjustment of test strength. Despite its importance, ICA generation has been under-explored in the CT community, resulting in limited and suboptimal existing approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>To address this gap, we introduce a novel strategy, namely <em>Top-down</em>, for optimizing ICA generation.</div></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><div>In contrast to the traditional strategy, named <em>Bottom-up</em>, <em>Top-down</em> starts with a higher-strength test set and then extracts lower-strength sets from it, thus leveraging test case generation algorithms more effectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>We conducted a comparative evaluation of the two strategies across 17 real-world software with 84 total versions. The results demonstrate that compared with <em>Bottom-up</em>, the <em>Top-down</em> strategy requires less time and generates smaller ICAs while covering more higher-strength interactions. Furthermore, <em>Top-down</em> outperforms <em>Bottom-up</em> in early fault detection and code line coverage, while also surpassing the random and direct CA generation strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The <em>Top-down</em> strategy not only improved the efficiency of test case generation but also enhanced the effectiveness of fault detection in the incremental testing scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 107601"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924002064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context:

The Incremental Covering Array (ICA) offers a flexible and efficient test schedule for Combinatorial Testing (CT) by enabling dynamic adjustment of test strength. Despite its importance, ICA generation has been under-explored in the CT community, resulting in limited and suboptimal existing approaches.

Objective:

To address this gap, we introduce a novel strategy, namely Top-down, for optimizing ICA generation.

Method:

In contrast to the traditional strategy, named Bottom-up, Top-down starts with a higher-strength test set and then extracts lower-strength sets from it, thus leveraging test case generation algorithms more effectively.

Results:

We conducted a comparative evaluation of the two strategies across 17 real-world software with 84 total versions. The results demonstrate that compared with Bottom-up, the Top-down strategy requires less time and generates smaller ICAs while covering more higher-strength interactions. Furthermore, Top-down outperforms Bottom-up in early fault detection and code line coverage, while also surpassing the random and direct CA generation strategies.

Conclusion:

The Top-down strategy not only improved the efficiency of test case generation but also enhanced the effectiveness of fault detection in the incremental testing scenarios.
自上而下:增量覆盖阵列生成的更好策略
背景:增量覆盖阵列(ICA)通过动态调整测试强度,为组合测试(CT)提供了灵活高效的测试计划。方法:与传统的自下而上(Bottom-up)策略相比,自上而下(Top-down)策略从强度较高的测试集开始,然后从中提取强度较低的测试集,从而更有效地利用测试用例生成算法。结果:我们在 17 个真实世界软件的 84 个版本中对这两种策略进行了比较评估。结果表明,与 "自下而上 "相比,"自上而下 "策略所需的时间更短,生成的 ICA 更小,同时涵盖的交互强度更高。结论:自上而下策略不仅提高了测试用例生成的效率,还增强了增量测试场景中故障检测的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information and Software Technology
Information and Software Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
9.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include: • Software management, quality and metrics, • Software processes, • Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming • Functional and non-functional software requirements • Software testing and verification & validation • Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information. The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信