Scoring System to Personalize Management of Emphysematous Pyelonephritis.

0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ankur Mittal, Deepak Kumar, Vikas Kumar Panwar, Rohit Ranjan, Shiv Charan Navriya, Akshay Upadhyaya, Harshit Agarwal, Gautam Shubhankar, Arup Kumar Mandal
{"title":"Scoring System to Personalize Management of Emphysematous Pyelonephritis.","authors":"Ankur Mittal, Deepak Kumar, Vikas Kumar Panwar, Rohit Ranjan, Shiv Charan Navriya, Akshay Upadhyaya, Harshit Agarwal, Gautam Shubhankar, Arup Kumar Mandal","doi":"10.5152/tud.2024.23165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is a life-threatening condition that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. The prognosis of EPN is variable, and there is no single treatment that is universally effective.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study, we developed a scoring system to predict the prognosis of EPN and to guide management. The scoring system was developed based on a retrospective analysis of 91 patients with EPN. Nineteen risk factors for emphysematous pyelonephritis were assessed with univariate and multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven factors were found significant on analysis. The scoring system was developed by including these 7 risk factors: renal stone disease, leukocytosis, raised creatinine, EPN grade, and septic shock. The score ranged from 1 to 18, with a higher score indicating a worse prognosis. The scoring system was able to stratify patients into three risk groups: good risk, intermediate risk, and poor risk. The scoring system can be used to personalize the management of EPN. Patients in the good-risk group may be managed with conservative treatment, while patients in the intermediate-risk and poor-risk groups may require intervention, such as DJ stenting, percutaneous nephrolithotomy or nephrectomy. The scoring system is a valuable tool for predicting the prognosis of EPN and guiding management. It can help clinicians to tailor treatment to the individual patient and to improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prognostic score helps identify patients who are at high risk. This score helps in the selection of appropriate management options.</p>","PeriodicalId":101337,"journal":{"name":"Urology research & practice","volume":"50 3","pages":"193-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology research & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2024.23165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is a life-threatening condition that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. The prognosis of EPN is variable, and there is no single treatment that is universally effective.

Materials and methods: In this study, we developed a scoring system to predict the prognosis of EPN and to guide management. The scoring system was developed based on a retrospective analysis of 91 patients with EPN. Nineteen risk factors for emphysematous pyelonephritis were assessed with univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results: Seven factors were found significant on analysis. The scoring system was developed by including these 7 risk factors: renal stone disease, leukocytosis, raised creatinine, EPN grade, and septic shock. The score ranged from 1 to 18, with a higher score indicating a worse prognosis. The scoring system was able to stratify patients into three risk groups: good risk, intermediate risk, and poor risk. The scoring system can be used to personalize the management of EPN. Patients in the good-risk group may be managed with conservative treatment, while patients in the intermediate-risk and poor-risk groups may require intervention, such as DJ stenting, percutaneous nephrolithotomy or nephrectomy. The scoring system is a valuable tool for predicting the prognosis of EPN and guiding management. It can help clinicians to tailor treatment to the individual patient and to improve outcomes.

Conclusion: The prognostic score helps identify patients who are at high risk. This score helps in the selection of appropriate management options.

个性化治疗气肿性肾盂肾炎的评分系统
目的:气肿性肾盂肾炎(EPN)是一种危及生命的疾病,需要及时诊断和治疗。气肿性肾盂肾炎的预后各不相同,而且没有一种治疗方法是普遍有效的:在这项研究中,我们开发了一套评分系统来预测 EPN 的预后并指导治疗。该评分系统是在对 91 名 EPN 患者进行回顾性分析的基础上制定的。通过单变量和多变量分析评估了气肿性肾盂肾炎的 19 个风险因素:结果:分析发现七个因素具有重要意义。包括这 7 个危险因素在内的评分系统是:肾结石病、白细胞增多、肌酐升高、EPN 等级和脓毒性休克。评分范围为 1 至 18 分,分数越高,预后越差。该评分系统可将患者分为三个风险组:良好风险组、中等风险组和不良风险组。该评分系统可用于对 EPN 进行个性化管理。良好风险组的患者可采取保守治疗,而中度风险和不良风险组的患者可能需要进行干预,如 DJ 支架植入术、经皮肾取石术或肾切除术。该评分系统是预测 EPN 预后和指导治疗的重要工具。它可以帮助临床医生根据患者的具体情况进行治疗,改善预后:预后评分有助于识别高危患者。该评分有助于选择适当的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信