Simulation-based assessment in the context of paramedic education: A scoping review

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1111/tct.13834
Steve Bell
{"title":"Simulation-based assessment in the context of paramedic education: A scoping review","authors":"Steve Bell","doi":"10.1111/tct.13834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Simulation is a widespread modality in the field of medical education. Within the paramedic sphere, simulation is valuable in providing exposure to high-acuity, low occurrence incidents encountered rarely in practice, affording unique educational opportunities. Recognising this importance, this scoping review seeks to establish the contemporaneous evidence base for the use of simulation-based assessment in the context of paramedic education, systematically map the research done in this area and consider the implications for future educational programmes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A scoping review of peer, and non-peer reviewed literature across a broad range of medical literature databases for both published and grey material utilising previously published search filters for the paramedic field. The review was conducted aligned to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Studies were selected based on relevance to the research question.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty four unique papers were identified, filtered via the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria to five included papers. The application of forward snowballing methodology revealed three additional papers included for appraisal. Thematic analysis of the eight papers revealed the domains of assessment acceptability and assessment validity as key considerations for the design and use of simulation-based assessment in the field.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Simulation-based assessment has a role in paramedic education; additional research is necessary to empirically establish the validity and reliability of the modality in the field.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Simulation is a widespread modality in the field of medical education. Within the paramedic sphere, simulation is valuable in providing exposure to high-acuity, low occurrence incidents encountered rarely in practice, affording unique educational opportunities. Recognising this importance, this scoping review seeks to establish the contemporaneous evidence base for the use of simulation-based assessment in the context of paramedic education, systematically map the research done in this area and consider the implications for future educational programmes.

Methods

A scoping review of peer, and non-peer reviewed literature across a broad range of medical literature databases for both published and grey material utilising previously published search filters for the paramedic field. The review was conducted aligned to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Studies were selected based on relevance to the research question.

Results

Twenty four unique papers were identified, filtered via the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria to five included papers. The application of forward snowballing methodology revealed three additional papers included for appraisal. Thematic analysis of the eight papers revealed the domains of assessment acceptability and assessment validity as key considerations for the design and use of simulation-based assessment in the field.

Conclusion

Simulation-based assessment has a role in paramedic education; additional research is necessary to empirically establish the validity and reliability of the modality in the field.

辅助医务人员教育中的模拟评估:范围审查。
目的:模拟是医学教育领域的一种广泛模式。在辅助医务人员领域,模拟在提供实践中极少遇到的高危性、低发生率事件方面具有重要价值,可提供独特的教育机会。认识到这一重要性,本范围界定综述旨在为辅助医务人员教育中使用模拟评估建立当代证据基础,系统地绘制该领域的研究地图,并考虑对未来教育计划的影响:方法:利用之前发布的辅助医务人员领域搜索过滤器,在广泛的医学文献数据库中对同行和非同行评审文献进行范围界定,包括已出版和灰色资料。综述按照 PRISMA 扩展范围综述核对表进行。根据与研究问题的相关性对研究进行筛选:通过对五篇纳入论文应用纳入和排除标准进行筛选,确定了 24 篇独特的论文。通过采用 "向前滚雪球 "的方法,又发现了三篇纳入评估的论文。对这八篇论文进行的专题分析表明,评估的可接受性和评估的有效性是设计和使用模拟评估的关键因素:基于模拟的评估在辅助医务人员教育中可以发挥作用;有必要开展更多的研究,从经验上确定这种评估方式在实际工作中的有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信