The responsiveness and clinical utility of the Australian therapy outcome measure for indigenous clients.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Nick Sheahan, Rosamund Harrington, Alison Nelson, Loretta Sheppard, Ashley Potgieter, Amy Bartlett, Rebekah White, Renee Brown
{"title":"The responsiveness and clinical utility of the Australian therapy outcome measure for indigenous clients.","authors":"Nick Sheahan, Rosamund Harrington, Alison Nelson, Loretta Sheppard, Ashley Potgieter, Amy Bartlett, Rebekah White, Renee Brown","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.13001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Australian Therapy Outcome Measure for Indigenous Clients (ATOMIC) is a goal-setting tool designed to measure therapy outcomes with First Australians. It was originally developed and validated for use with First Australian children as a culturally responsive alternative to traditional western outcome measures. This research explored the applicability, responsiveness and clinical utility of the ATOMIC when used with First Australian adults attending an urban health service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Separate parallel studies investigated responsiveness and clinical utility. The first employed quantitative methods to investigate change over time via pre- and post-intervention data. The second employed a qualitative phenomenological approach to determine the clinical utility of the tool. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were used, respectively, to understand the experience of using the ATOMIC from a client and clinician perspective. Client perspectives on the purpose of the tool and its alignment with their views on health care and therapists' perspective on the ease of use and applicability of the tool to the health service setting were explored. These data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Consumer and community consultation: </strong>The methodological approach followed National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC, 2018) guidelines in considering cultural continuity, reciprocity and equity. This project was initiated and guided by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders (the advisory group) as a prioritised need for a robust way of reporting outcomes to complement existing statistical and narrative data within a large community-controlled health service. The advisory group provided high level governance from project conception to conclusion and were involved in yarn-backs about research findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responsiveness: Wilcoxon test showed a statistically significant increase (P = 0.00) in ATOMIC scores pre- (mean = 1.8) and post- (mean = 8) intervention. Effect size (Cohen d) was deemed significant calculated at 2.1.</p><p><strong>Clinical utility: </strong>Findings included: First Australian clients are adept at self-managing their conditions; the ATOMIC is a clinically useful outcome measure, which reflects this; ATOMIC is an acceptable tool to First Australian clients and clinicians and supports culturally responsive goal setting and occupational therapy practice.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>The Australian Therapy Outcome Measure for Indigenous Clients (ATOMIC) was created to measure how well therapy works for First Australian children. This research investigates whether it also works with adult First Australians. Two studies were undertaken: a quantitative study to see whether ATOMIC scores changed before and after therapy and a qualitative study, which asked people what they thought about using the ATOMIC. ATOMIC scores went up after therapy, indicating it is sensitive to change, and both clients and therapists liked using the ATOMIC and found it useful. It matched well with how First Australian adults see health care and helped set goals for therapy. The results of the study show that the ATOMIC is helpful for both clients and therapists in understanding how well therapy works and helps to set goals that make sense culturally. This study looked at one health service in one regional area, so more research is needed to establish whether it works elsewhere. Overall, the results indicate the ATOMIC is a promising step towards better therapy for Indigenous Australians.</p>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.13001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Australian Therapy Outcome Measure for Indigenous Clients (ATOMIC) is a goal-setting tool designed to measure therapy outcomes with First Australians. It was originally developed and validated for use with First Australian children as a culturally responsive alternative to traditional western outcome measures. This research explored the applicability, responsiveness and clinical utility of the ATOMIC when used with First Australian adults attending an urban health service.

Methods: Separate parallel studies investigated responsiveness and clinical utility. The first employed quantitative methods to investigate change over time via pre- and post-intervention data. The second employed a qualitative phenomenological approach to determine the clinical utility of the tool. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were used, respectively, to understand the experience of using the ATOMIC from a client and clinician perspective. Client perspectives on the purpose of the tool and its alignment with their views on health care and therapists' perspective on the ease of use and applicability of the tool to the health service setting were explored. These data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Consumer and community consultation: The methodological approach followed National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC, 2018) guidelines in considering cultural continuity, reciprocity and equity. This project was initiated and guided by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders (the advisory group) as a prioritised need for a robust way of reporting outcomes to complement existing statistical and narrative data within a large community-controlled health service. The advisory group provided high level governance from project conception to conclusion and were involved in yarn-backs about research findings.

Results: Responsiveness: Wilcoxon test showed a statistically significant increase (P = 0.00) in ATOMIC scores pre- (mean = 1.8) and post- (mean = 8) intervention. Effect size (Cohen d) was deemed significant calculated at 2.1.

Clinical utility: Findings included: First Australian clients are adept at self-managing their conditions; the ATOMIC is a clinically useful outcome measure, which reflects this; ATOMIC is an acceptable tool to First Australian clients and clinicians and supports culturally responsive goal setting and occupational therapy practice.

Plain language summary: The Australian Therapy Outcome Measure for Indigenous Clients (ATOMIC) was created to measure how well therapy works for First Australian children. This research investigates whether it also works with adult First Australians. Two studies were undertaken: a quantitative study to see whether ATOMIC scores changed before and after therapy and a qualitative study, which asked people what they thought about using the ATOMIC. ATOMIC scores went up after therapy, indicating it is sensitive to change, and both clients and therapists liked using the ATOMIC and found it useful. It matched well with how First Australian adults see health care and helped set goals for therapy. The results of the study show that the ATOMIC is helpful for both clients and therapists in understanding how well therapy works and helps to set goals that make sense culturally. This study looked at one health service in one regional area, so more research is needed to establish whether it works elsewhere. Overall, the results indicate the ATOMIC is a promising step towards better therapy for Indigenous Australians.

澳大利亚治疗结果测量法对土著客户的响应性和临床实用性。
简介澳大利亚土著客户治疗结果测量法(ATOMIC)是一种目标设定工具,旨在测量原住民澳大利亚人的治疗结果。它最初是为澳大利亚原住民儿童开发和验证的,作为传统西方治疗结果测量法的一种文化响应替代方法。本研究探讨了ATOMIC用于在城市医疗服务机构就诊的澳大利亚原住民成年人时的适用性、响应性和临床实用性:方法:分别进行平行研究,调查响应性和临床实用性。第一项研究采用定量方法,通过干预前后的数据调查随时间推移发生的变化。第二项研究采用定性现象学方法来确定该工具的临床实用性。分别采用半结构式访谈和焦点小组的方式,从客户和临床医生的角度了解使用 ATOMIC 的体验。研究人员从客户的角度了解了该工具的目的及其与客户对医疗保健的看法的一致性,并从治疗师的角度了解了该工具在医疗服务环境中的易用性和适用性。这些数据采用反思性专题分析法进行分析:方法论方法遵循了国家健康与医学研究委员会(NHMRC,2018 年)在考虑文化连续性、互惠性和公平性方面的指导方针。该项目由土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民领袖(咨询小组)发起和指导,因为在一个由社区控制的大型医疗服务机构中,优先需要一种稳健的结果报告方式来补充现有的统计和叙述数据。咨询小组从项目构思到结束提供了高层次的管理,并参与了对研究结果的反馈:响应性:Wilcoxon检验显示,干预前(平均值=1.8)和干预后(平均值=8)的ATOMIC得分均有显著提高(P=0.00)。效果大小(Cohen d)为 2.1:研究结果包括澳大利亚原住民客户善于自我管理病情;ATOMIC是一种临床实用的结果测量方法,反映了这一点;ATOMIC是一种澳大利亚原住民客户和临床医生都能接受的工具,支持具有文化敏感性的目标设定和职业治疗实践。本研究调查了它是否也适用于成年原住民。研究人员进行了两项研究:一项是定量研究,以了解 ATOMIC 分数在治疗前后是否发生变化;另一项是定性研究,以了解人们对使用 ATOMIC 的看法。ATOMIC得分在治疗后有所上升,这表明它对变化很敏感,客户和治疗师都喜欢使用ATOMIC,并认为它很有用。它非常符合第一批澳大利亚成年人对医疗保健的看法,有助于设定治疗目标。研究结果表明,ATOMIC 有助于客户和治疗师了解治疗效果如何,并帮助设定具有文化意义的目标。这项研究针对的是一个地区的一家医疗服务机构,因此还需要更多的研究来确定它在其他地方是否有效。总之,研究结果表明,ATOMIC 是为澳大利亚土著居民提供更好的治疗而迈出的充满希望的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信