Long-Term Impact of the Bloor Viaduct Suicide Barrier on Suicides in Toronto: A Time-Series Analysis: Effet à long terme de la barrière anti-suicide du viaduc Bloor sur les suicides à Toronto : une analyse chronologique.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mark Sinyor, Vera Yu Men, Prudence Po Ming Chan, Daniel Sanchez Morales, Anthony J Levitt, Ayal Schaffer
{"title":"Long-Term Impact of the Bloor Viaduct Suicide Barrier on Suicides in Toronto: A Time-Series Analysis: Effet à long terme de la barrière anti-suicide du viaduc Bloor sur les suicides à Toronto : une analyse chronologique.","authors":"Mark Sinyor, Vera Yu Men, Prudence Po Ming Chan, Daniel Sanchez Morales, Anthony J Levitt, Ayal Schaffer","doi":"10.1177/07067437241293978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A suicide prevention barrier was installed at Toronto's Bloor Viaduct bridge in 2003. It was associated with short-term location substitution, possibly mediated by media effects that did not persist over 1 decade. The long-term impact of the barrier is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined rates of suicides by jumping from the Bloor Viaduct, other bridges and by other methods using coroner's records in Toronto (1998-2020). We used interrupted time-series Poisson regression analyses to model changes in quarterly bridge-related suicides after barrier installation. A secondary analysis explored the potential substitution effects of suicide by other methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5219 suicides from 1998 to 2020, 303 were by jumping from bridges. After controlling for covariates, installation of the Bloor Viaduct suicide barrier was associated with a 49% step decrease in bridge-related suicide in the next quarter in Toronto (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.86) with no rebound increase in bridge-related suicide during the subsequent 17 years after the original drop (IRR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.03). There was also no associated change in suicides by other methods after the barrier (IRR = 1.04, 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to initial findings, these results indicate an enduring suicide prevention effect of the Bloor Viaduct suicide barrier. They support the long-term utility of structural interventions at high-frequency sites for suicide.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"7067437241293978"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437241293978","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A suicide prevention barrier was installed at Toronto's Bloor Viaduct bridge in 2003. It was associated with short-term location substitution, possibly mediated by media effects that did not persist over 1 decade. The long-term impact of the barrier is unknown.

Methods: We examined rates of suicides by jumping from the Bloor Viaduct, other bridges and by other methods using coroner's records in Toronto (1998-2020). We used interrupted time-series Poisson regression analyses to model changes in quarterly bridge-related suicides after barrier installation. A secondary analysis explored the potential substitution effects of suicide by other methods.

Results: Of 5219 suicides from 1998 to 2020, 303 were by jumping from bridges. After controlling for covariates, installation of the Bloor Viaduct suicide barrier was associated with a 49% step decrease in bridge-related suicide in the next quarter in Toronto (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.86) with no rebound increase in bridge-related suicide during the subsequent 17 years after the original drop (IRR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.03). There was also no associated change in suicides by other methods after the barrier (IRR = 1.04, 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.20).

Conclusions: Contrary to initial findings, these results indicate an enduring suicide prevention effect of the Bloor Viaduct suicide barrier. They support the long-term utility of structural interventions at high-frequency sites for suicide.

布卢尔高架桥自杀障碍对多伦多自杀事件的长期影响:时间序列分析》(Bloor Viaduct Suicide Barrier on Suicides in Toronto: A Time-Series Analysis)。
背景:2003 年,在多伦多布卢尔高架桥上安装了预防自杀屏障。它与短期的地点替代有关,可能是受媒体效应的影响,但这种影响不会持续十年。该障碍物的长期影响尚不清楚:我们使用多伦多验尸官的记录(1998-2020 年)研究了从布卢尔高架桥、其他桥梁和其他方法跳桥自杀的比率。我们使用间断时间序列泊松回归分析来模拟安装护栏后每季度与桥梁相关的自杀事件的变化。一项辅助分析探讨了其他自杀方式的潜在替代效应:在 1998 年至 2020 年的 5219 起自杀事件中,有 303 起是跳桥自杀。在控制协变量后,布卢尔高架桥自杀屏障的安装与多伦多下一季度与桥梁相关的自杀率下降 49% 有关(发病率比 [IRR] = 0.51,95% CI,0.30 至 0.86),在最初下降后的 17 年中,与桥梁相关的自杀率没有反弹增加(IRR = 0.99,95% CI,0.96 至 1.03)。障碍之后,通过其他方式自杀的人数也没有相关变化(IRR = 1.04,95% CI,0.90 至 1.20):与最初的研究结果相反,这些结果表明布卢尔高架桥自杀屏障具有持久的自杀预防效果。这些结果支持在自杀高发地点采取结构性干预措施的长期效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1956, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (The CJP) has been keeping psychiatrists up-to-date on the latest research for nearly 60 years. The CJP provides a forum for psychiatry and mental health professionals to share their findings with researchers and clinicians. The CJP includes peer-reviewed scientific articles analyzing ongoing developments in Canadian and international psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信