Antibiotic resistance in community-acquired urinary tract infections. Did the COVID-19 pandemic cause a change?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Emine Unal Evren, Hakan Evren, Nilufer Galip
{"title":"Antibiotic resistance in community-acquired urinary tract infections. Did the COVID-19 pandemic cause a change?","authors":"Emine Unal Evren, Hakan Evren, Nilufer Galip","doi":"10.3855/jidc.18844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial resistance rates before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>897 positive urine cultures collected from outpatients of all ages between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, were analyzed. The antibiotic susceptibility tests (AST) were analyzed by using an automated VITEK 2 (Biomerieux, Marcy-l`Étoile, France) compact system. AST results were interpreted according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria. The significance of resistance rates was tested with the Pearson's Chi-squared test and risk factors of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) positiveness were identified with binary logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>E. coli (n = 774) and K. pneumoniae (n = 123) were isolated in 86.3% and 13.7% of the patients, respectively. During this period of six years before and during pandemic, the highest resistance rate was found for cefuroxime axetil (49.8%) and the lowest for nitrofuratoin (6.0%). Statistically significant increases in resistance compared to the pre-pandemic period were only determined for cefixime (37.2 vs 46.0%) and ceftriaxone (37.6 vs 46.1%) (p = 0.010). ESBL positivity was the most important factor that statistically increased resistance for all antibiotics (p < 0.001 for all). Being male [OR (95% CI) 1.56 (1.13-2.15)] and presenting to the clinic after the pandemic period [1.4 (1.1-1.8)] were found to increase ESBL positiveness significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ceftriaxone and Cefixime resistance rates and ESBL positivity among the uropathogens E. coli and K. pneumoniae increased during the pandemic compared with the pre-pandemic period. ESBL positivity was higher in males.</p>","PeriodicalId":49160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","volume":"18 9.1","pages":"S116-S125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.18844","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial resistance rates before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Methodology: 897 positive urine cultures collected from outpatients of all ages between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, were analyzed. The antibiotic susceptibility tests (AST) were analyzed by using an automated VITEK 2 (Biomerieux, Marcy-l`Étoile, France) compact system. AST results were interpreted according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria. The significance of resistance rates was tested with the Pearson's Chi-squared test and risk factors of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) positiveness were identified with binary logistic regression.

Results: E. coli (n = 774) and K. pneumoniae (n = 123) were isolated in 86.3% and 13.7% of the patients, respectively. During this period of six years before and during pandemic, the highest resistance rate was found for cefuroxime axetil (49.8%) and the lowest for nitrofuratoin (6.0%). Statistically significant increases in resistance compared to the pre-pandemic period were only determined for cefixime (37.2 vs 46.0%) and ceftriaxone (37.6 vs 46.1%) (p = 0.010). ESBL positivity was the most important factor that statistically increased resistance for all antibiotics (p < 0.001 for all). Being male [OR (95% CI) 1.56 (1.13-2.15)] and presenting to the clinic after the pandemic period [1.4 (1.1-1.8)] were found to increase ESBL positiveness significantly.

Conclusions: Ceftriaxone and Cefixime resistance rates and ESBL positivity among the uropathogens E. coli and K. pneumoniae increased during the pandemic compared with the pre-pandemic period. ESBL positivity was higher in males.

社区获得性尿路感染的抗生素耐药性。COVID-19 大流行是否引起了变化?
导言本研究旨在评估2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行之前和期间的抗菌药耐药率。方法:分析了2017年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间从各年龄段门诊患者处收集的897份阳性尿培养物。抗生素药敏试验(AST)使用自动 VITEK 2(Biomerieux,法国马西勒托瓦)紧凑型系统进行分析。AST 结果根据欧洲抗菌药物敏感性检测委员会(EUCAST)的标准进行解释。耐药率的显著性采用皮尔逊卡方检验,扩展谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)阳性的风险因素采用二元逻辑回归:结果:86.3%和13.7%的患者分别分离出大肠杆菌(n = 774)和肺炎双球菌(n = 123)。在大流行前和大流行期间的六年中,头孢呋辛酯的耐药率最高(49.8%),硝基呋喃妥因的耐药率最低(6.0%)。与大流行前相比,只有头孢克肟(37.2% 对 46.0%)和头孢曲松(37.6% 对 46.1%)的耐药性出现了统计学意义上的明显增加(p = 0.010)。ESBL阳性是导致所有抗生素耐药性增加的最重要因素(所有因素的 p < 0.001)。男性[OR (95% CI) 1.56 (1.13-2.15)]和大流行期后就诊[1.4 (1.1-1.8)]会显著增加ESBL阳性率:结论:与大流行前相比,大流行期间尿路病原体大肠杆菌和肺炎双球菌对头孢曲松和头孢克肟的耐药率和ESBL阳性率均有所上升。男性的 ESBL 阳性率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
239
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries (JIDC) is an international journal, intended for the publication of scientific articles from Developing Countries by scientists from Developing Countries. JIDC is an independent, on-line publication with an international editorial board. JIDC is open access with no cost to view or download articles and reasonable cost for publication of research artcles, making JIDC easily availiable to scientists from resource restricted regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信