Hip Stability Isometric Test (HipSIT): Concurrent Validity and Reference Values for CrossFit® Participants.

IF 1.6 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-11-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.124119
Thiago R T Santos, Ana Luiza R Rodrigues, Henrique M P Faria, Stéphane M Teixeira, Livia S Pogetti, Andressa Silva, Renan A Resende, Juliana M Ocarino
{"title":"Hip Stability Isometric Test (HipSIT): Concurrent Validity and Reference Values for CrossFit® Participants.","authors":"Thiago R T Santos, Ana Luiza R Rodrigues, Henrique M P Faria, Stéphane M Teixeira, Livia S Pogetti, Andressa Silva, Renan A Resende, Juliana M Ocarino","doi":"10.26603/001c.124119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Hip Stability Isometric Test (HipSIT) is a practical clinical assessment of posterolateral hip muscle performance. There is no information regarding the validity of the HipSIT in participants exposed to high-intensity training, such as CrossFit®.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the Hip Stability Isometric Test (HipSIT) concurrent validity with the isokinetic assessment in CrossFit® participants. A secondary purpose was to characterize posterolateral hip muscular performance with HipSIT according to sex and lower limb dominance in athletes who participate in CrossFit®.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One-hundred and eleven CrossFit® participants were evaluated. The posterolateral hip muscles were evaluated using the HipSIT with a hand-held dynamometer. The hip extensors and abductors' peak torque and maximum work were assessed with the Biodex System® 4 Pro isokinetic dynamometer at 60º/s. Concurrent validity between measurements was assessed with the Spearman correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analyses. The comparison of results between sexes and between limbs was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spearman analyses indicated a significant positive correlation with medium effect size between HipSIT and isokinetic variables ( <math><mi>ρ</mi></math> = 0.36 to 0.49). Bland-Altman analyses showed that most measures were within the 95% limits of agreement. The HipSIT was greater in males than females (p < 0.001) and greater in the dominant than non-dominant limb (p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings support using HipSIT in the clinical assessment of CrossFit® participants. Clinicians can use the data as reference values for athletes who participate in CrossFit® and should consider the difference between sexes and lower limbs.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"19 11","pages":"1417-1425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.124119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Hip Stability Isometric Test (HipSIT) is a practical clinical assessment of posterolateral hip muscle performance. There is no information regarding the validity of the HipSIT in participants exposed to high-intensity training, such as CrossFit®.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the Hip Stability Isometric Test (HipSIT) concurrent validity with the isokinetic assessment in CrossFit® participants. A secondary purpose was to characterize posterolateral hip muscular performance with HipSIT according to sex and lower limb dominance in athletes who participate in CrossFit®.

Study design: Cross-sectional.

Methods: One-hundred and eleven CrossFit® participants were evaluated. The posterolateral hip muscles were evaluated using the HipSIT with a hand-held dynamometer. The hip extensors and abductors' peak torque and maximum work were assessed with the Biodex System® 4 Pro isokinetic dynamometer at 60º/s. Concurrent validity between measurements was assessed with the Spearman correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analyses. The comparison of results between sexes and between limbs was also performed.

Results: Spearman analyses indicated a significant positive correlation with medium effect size between HipSIT and isokinetic variables ( ρ = 0.36 to 0.49). Bland-Altman analyses showed that most measures were within the 95% limits of agreement. The HipSIT was greater in males than females (p < 0.001) and greater in the dominant than non-dominant limb (p = 0.03).

Conclusion: The findings support using HipSIT in the clinical assessment of CrossFit® participants. Clinicians can use the data as reference values for athletes who participate in CrossFit® and should consider the difference between sexes and lower limbs.

Level of evidence: 3.

髋关节稳定性等长测试(HipSIT):CrossFit®参与者的并发有效性和参考值。
背景:髋关节稳定性等长测试(HipSIT)是一种实用的髋关节后外侧肌肉性能临床评估方法。目的:本研究的目的是调查髋关节稳定性等长测试(HipSIT)与 CrossFit® 参与者的等动学评估的并发有效性。另一个目的是根据参加 CrossFit® 运动员的性别和下肢优势,用 HipSIT 分析髋关节后外侧肌肉表现的特征:研究设计:横断面:对 111 名 CrossFit® 参与者进行了评估。使用手持式测力计 HipSIT 对髋关节后外侧肌肉进行评估。使用 Biodex System® 4 Pro 等动测力计以 60º/s 的速度评估髋关节伸肌和外展肌的峰值扭矩和最大功。通过斯皮尔曼相关系数和布兰德-阿尔特曼分析评估了测量结果之间的并发有效性。此外,还对不同性别和不同肢体的结果进行了比较:斯皮尔曼分析表明,HipSIT 和等速变量之间存在显著的正相关,影响程度中等(ρ = 0.36 至 0.49)。Bland-Altman 分析表明,大多数测量结果的一致性都在 95% 的范围内。男性的 HipSIT 值高于女性(p < 0.001),优势肢体的 HipSIT 值高于非优势肢体(p = 0.03):结论:研究结果支持在对 CrossFit® 参与者进行临床评估时使用 HipSIT。临床医生可将这些数据作为参加 CrossFit® 运动员的参考值,并应考虑性别和下肢之间的差异:3.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信