The (in)congruence effects of organizational green compensation and employee green conscientiousness on pro-environmental behavior: evidence from China.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Haiyan Zhang, Shuwei Sun
{"title":"The (in)congruence effects of organizational green compensation and employee green conscientiousness on pro-environmental behavior: evidence from China.","authors":"Haiyan Zhang, Shuwei Sun","doi":"10.1186/s40359-024-02122-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In past decades, the Chinese government has enacted a series of ecological policies to encourage organizations, the pivotal institutional agents implementing national policies, and employees, the crucial micro-actors engaging in ecological construction, to bring about employee pro-environmental behavior (EPEB) which is the foundation to realize nation's ecological strategies. Yet, the effectiveness of a widely adopted organizational-level green management practice \"organizational green compensation\" (OGC) and a typical individual-level green personality trait \"employee green conscientiousness\" (EGC) have been explored alone, ignoring the prevalence of various OGC-EGC combinations and failing to clarify the potential influences of OGC-EGC (in)congruence on EPEB. Our research endeavors to address this limitation by resolving the following two problems: What are the (in)congruence effects of OGC and EGC on EPEB in the Chinese context? And what is the underlying mechanism?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study 1 surveyed EGC, OGC, and EPEB among 778 subordinate-supervisor dyads and sought to test two single effects and three sets of comparisons between and within the congruence and incongruence effects using the methodology of polynomial regression and response surface analysis. Study 2 measured EGC, OGC, employee environmental commitment (EEC), and EPEB among 713 subordinate-supervisor dyads and attempted to verify the mediating role of EEC employing the block variable approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study 1 found that OGC and EGC independently, positively promote EPEB (ß = 0.39, p < 0.001; ß = 0.24, p < 0.001), the OGC-EGC congruence relates to higher EPEB compared to the OGC-EGC incongruence (p<sub>11</sub> = 3.77, 95% CI = [0.71, 23.04]; p<sub>10</sub> =  - 0.65, 95% CI = [- 25.80, 0.42]; [α<sub>3</sub> -α<sub>4</sub> +α<sub>5</sub>] =  - 0.24, 95% CI = [- 0.41, - 0.07]), the EPEB level is higher when the OGC-EGC congruence is at a high rather than low level ([α<sub>1</sub> +α<sub>2</sub>] = 0.51, 95% CI = [0.39, 0.62]), and the EPEB level under the high-low combination is lower than that under the low-high combination ([α<sub>1</sub>-α<sub>2</sub>] =  - 0.20, 95% CI = [- 0.38, - 0.02]). Study 2 further confirmed that EEC plays a mediating role during the OGC-EGC-EPEB relationships (the indirect effect = 0.14, 95% CI = [0.08, 0.20]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research substantiates the value of OGC-EGC (in)congruence to fully understand EPEB variations such that, EPEB will be boosted (hampered) when OGC is (in)congruent with EGC; a higher congruence between OGC and EGC leads to higher EPEB, the high-low combination of OGC and EGC results in lower EPEB compared to the low-high combination, and EEC plays a mediating role in the above relationships, offering the Chinese evidence and providing theoretical and practical implications for the optimization of the OGC-EGC combinations to strengthen EPEB.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"12 1","pages":"623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02122-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In past decades, the Chinese government has enacted a series of ecological policies to encourage organizations, the pivotal institutional agents implementing national policies, and employees, the crucial micro-actors engaging in ecological construction, to bring about employee pro-environmental behavior (EPEB) which is the foundation to realize nation's ecological strategies. Yet, the effectiveness of a widely adopted organizational-level green management practice "organizational green compensation" (OGC) and a typical individual-level green personality trait "employee green conscientiousness" (EGC) have been explored alone, ignoring the prevalence of various OGC-EGC combinations and failing to clarify the potential influences of OGC-EGC (in)congruence on EPEB. Our research endeavors to address this limitation by resolving the following two problems: What are the (in)congruence effects of OGC and EGC on EPEB in the Chinese context? And what is the underlying mechanism?

Methods: Study 1 surveyed EGC, OGC, and EPEB among 778 subordinate-supervisor dyads and sought to test two single effects and three sets of comparisons between and within the congruence and incongruence effects using the methodology of polynomial regression and response surface analysis. Study 2 measured EGC, OGC, employee environmental commitment (EEC), and EPEB among 713 subordinate-supervisor dyads and attempted to verify the mediating role of EEC employing the block variable approach.

Results: Study 1 found that OGC and EGC independently, positively promote EPEB (ß = 0.39, p < 0.001; ß = 0.24, p < 0.001), the OGC-EGC congruence relates to higher EPEB compared to the OGC-EGC incongruence (p11 = 3.77, 95% CI = [0.71, 23.04]; p10 =  - 0.65, 95% CI = [- 25.80, 0.42]; [α3 -α4 +α5] =  - 0.24, 95% CI = [- 0.41, - 0.07]), the EPEB level is higher when the OGC-EGC congruence is at a high rather than low level ([α1 +α2] = 0.51, 95% CI = [0.39, 0.62]), and the EPEB level under the high-low combination is lower than that under the low-high combination ([α12] =  - 0.20, 95% CI = [- 0.38, - 0.02]). Study 2 further confirmed that EEC plays a mediating role during the OGC-EGC-EPEB relationships (the indirect effect = 0.14, 95% CI = [0.08, 0.20]).

Conclusion: This research substantiates the value of OGC-EGC (in)congruence to fully understand EPEB variations such that, EPEB will be boosted (hampered) when OGC is (in)congruent with EGC; a higher congruence between OGC and EGC leads to higher EPEB, the high-low combination of OGC and EGC results in lower EPEB compared to the low-high combination, and EEC plays a mediating role in the above relationships, offering the Chinese evidence and providing theoretical and practical implications for the optimization of the OGC-EGC combinations to strengthen EPEB.

组织绿色薪酬和员工绿色自觉性对亲环境行为的(不)一致效应:来自中国的证据。
背景:在过去的几十年中,中国政府制定了一系列生态政策,鼓励作为国家政策重要执行者的组织和作为生态建设重要微观主体的员工实施员工环保行为(EPEB),这是实现国家生态战略的基础。然而,人们只探讨了被广泛采用的组织层面的绿色管理实践 "组织绿色补偿"(OGC)和典型的个人层面的绿色人格特质 "员工绿色自觉性"(EGC)的有效性,忽视了各种 OGC-EGC 组合的普遍性,也未能阐明 OGC-EGC (不)一致对 EPEB 的潜在影响。我们的研究试图通过解决以下两个问题来解决这一局限性:在中国背景下,OGC和EGC对EPEB的(不)一致影响是什么?其背后的机制是什么?研究 1 调查了 778 个下属-上司二元组中的 EGC、OGC 和 EPEB,并试图使用多项式回归和响应面分析方法,检验同调效应和不同调效应之间的两个单一效应和三组比较。研究 2 测量了 713 个下属-主管二元组中的 EGC、OGC、员工环境承诺(EEC)和 EPEB,并尝试使用组块变量法验证 EEC 的中介作用:研究 1 发现,OGC 和 EGC 对 EPEB 有独立的正向促进作用(ß = 0.39,p 11 = 3.77,95% CI = [0.71, 23.04];p10 = - 0.65,95% CI = [- 25.80, 0.42];[α3 -α4 +α5] = - 0.24,95% CI = [- 0.41, - 0.07]),当 OGC-EGC 一致性处于高水平而非低水平时,EPEB 水平更高([α1 +α2] = 0.51,95% CI = [0.39,0.62]),且高-低组合下的 EPEB 水平低于低-高组合下的 EPEB 水平([α1-α2] = - 0.20,95% CI = [- 0.38,- 0.02])。研究 2 进一步证实,在 OGC-EGC-EPEB 关系中,EEC 起着中介作用(间接效应 = 0.14,95% CI = [0.08, 0.20]):本研究证实了 OGC-EGC (不)一致对于全面了解 EPEB 变化的价值,即当 OGC 与 EGC (不)一致时,EPEB 将得到促进(阻碍);OGC与EGC的一致性越高,EPEB越高,OGC与EGC的高-低组合与低-高组合相比,EPEB越低,而EEC在上述关系中起中介作用,为优化OGC-EGC组合以加强EPEB提供了中国证据和理论与实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信