Access to psychological therapies amongst patients with a mental health diagnosis in primary care: a data linkage study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Raquel Catalao, Matthew Broadbent, Mark Ashworth, Jayati Das-Munshi, Stephani L Hatch, Matthew Hotopf, Sarah Dorrington
{"title":"Access to psychological therapies amongst patients with a mental health diagnosis in primary care: a data linkage study.","authors":"Raquel Catalao, Matthew Broadbent, Mark Ashworth, Jayati Das-Munshi, Stephani L Hatch, Matthew Hotopf, Sarah Dorrington","doi":"10.1007/s00127-024-02787-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Significant numbers of people in England have fallen into a gap between primary care psychological therapies and specialist mental health services. We aim to examine pathways to care by looking at demographic variation in detection and referral to primary and secondary psychological services in south London.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal descriptive study using a record linkage between a primary care database (Lambeth DataNet) and a secondary care mental health database (CRIS). We extracted data on mental health diagnosis, prescriptions and episodes of care in mental health services for all patients of working age registered from 1 January 2008 to 1 March 2018 (pre-covid era).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those with a mental disorder detected in primary care (n = 110,419; 26.8%); 33.7% (n = 37,253) received no treatment; 21.3% (n = 23,548) exclusively accessed psychological treatment within NHS Talking Therapies and 7.6% accessed secondary care psychological therapies. People from minoritised groups were more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medication as the only treatment offered compared to the White British group. Men, Black African and Asian groups were less likely to access NHS Talking Therapies. People with a personality disorder diagnosis had the highest prevalence and number of NHS Talking Therapies treatment episodes (48.0%, n = 960), a similar percentage (44.1%, n = 881) received secondary care psychology treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights marked inequalities in access to psychological therapies for men and people from some minoritised ethnic groups across primary and secondary care and how individuals with personality disorders are offered multiple short-term courses in NHS Talking Therapies even where this is not recommended treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-024-02787-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Significant numbers of people in England have fallen into a gap between primary care psychological therapies and specialist mental health services. We aim to examine pathways to care by looking at demographic variation in detection and referral to primary and secondary psychological services in south London.

Methods: Longitudinal descriptive study using a record linkage between a primary care database (Lambeth DataNet) and a secondary care mental health database (CRIS). We extracted data on mental health diagnosis, prescriptions and episodes of care in mental health services for all patients of working age registered from 1 January 2008 to 1 March 2018 (pre-covid era).

Results: Of those with a mental disorder detected in primary care (n = 110,419; 26.8%); 33.7% (n = 37,253) received no treatment; 21.3% (n = 23,548) exclusively accessed psychological treatment within NHS Talking Therapies and 7.6% accessed secondary care psychological therapies. People from minoritised groups were more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medication as the only treatment offered compared to the White British group. Men, Black African and Asian groups were less likely to access NHS Talking Therapies. People with a personality disorder diagnosis had the highest prevalence and number of NHS Talking Therapies treatment episodes (48.0%, n = 960), a similar percentage (44.1%, n = 881) received secondary care psychology treatment.

Conclusion: Our study highlights marked inequalities in access to psychological therapies for men and people from some minoritised ethnic groups across primary and secondary care and how individuals with personality disorders are offered multiple short-term courses in NHS Talking Therapies even where this is not recommended treatment.

基层医疗机构中被诊断出患有精神疾病的患者接受心理治疗的情况:一项数据关联研究。
目的:在英格兰,有相当多的人陷入了初级医疗心理治疗和专科心理健康服务之间的鸿沟。我们的目的是通过观察伦敦南部初级和二级心理服务机构在检测和转诊方面的人口统计学差异来研究治疗途径:方法:纵向描述性研究,使用初级医疗数据库(兰贝斯数据网)和二级医疗心理健康数据库(CRIS)之间的记录链接。我们提取了 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 3 月 1 日(前科维德时代)登记在册的所有劳动适龄患者的精神健康诊断、处方和精神健康服务护理数据:在初级医疗机构查出患有精神障碍的患者中(n = 110,419; 26.8%),33.7%(n = 37,253)未接受任何治疗;21.3%(n = 23,548)专门接受了英国国家医疗服务体系谈话疗法的心理治疗,7.6%接受了二级医疗机构的心理治疗。与英国白人群体相比,少数民族群体更有可能将精神药物作为唯一的治疗手段。男性、非洲黑人和亚裔群体接受国家医疗服务系统谈话疗法的可能性较低。被诊断为人格障碍的人接受英国国家医疗服务体系谈话疗法治疗的比例和次数最高(48.0%,n = 960),接受二级护理心理治疗的比例也类似(44.1%,n = 881):我们的研究凸显了在初级和二级医疗机构中,男性和一些少数族裔群体在获得心理治疗方面的明显不平等,以及患有人格障碍的人是如何在国家医疗服务体系的谈话疗法中接受多次短期治疗的,即使这并不是推荐的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信