Pietro Scilipoti, Marco Moschini, Mario de Angelis, Luca Afferi, Chiara Lonati, Mattia Longoni, Giovanni Tremolada, Paolo Zaurito, Alessandro Viti, Alfonso Santangelo, Renate Pichler, Andrea Necchi, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Andrea Mari, Wojciech Krajewski, Ekaterina Laukthina, Benjamin Pradere, Francesco Del Giudice, Laura Mertens, Andrea Gallioli, Francesco Soria, Paolo Gontero, Simone Albisinni, Shahrokh F Shariat, Roberto Carando
{"title":"The role of re-transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with TaHG non muscle invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Pietro Scilipoti, Marco Moschini, Mario de Angelis, Luca Afferi, Chiara Lonati, Mattia Longoni, Giovanni Tremolada, Paolo Zaurito, Alessandro Viti, Alfonso Santangelo, Renate Pichler, Andrea Necchi, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Andrea Mari, Wojciech Krajewski, Ekaterina Laukthina, Benjamin Pradere, Francesco Del Giudice, Laura Mertens, Andrea Gallioli, Francesco Soria, Paolo Gontero, Simone Albisinni, Shahrokh F Shariat, Roberto Carando","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05342-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is lack of evidence regarding the indication for re-transurethral resection of bladder tumor (reTURBT) for Ta high grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This study aims to evaluate the oncological outcomes of patients with TaHG NMIBC to determine the benefit from performing reTURBT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We relied on a multicenter cohort of 317 TaHG NMIBC from 12 centers who underwent TURBT and a subsequent complete Bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction from 2009 to 2021. Kaplan Meier analyses estimated recurrence free survival (RFS) and progression free survival (PFS) according to reTURBT. Sub-analyses evaluated PFS in patients with multiple risk factors indicating necessity for reTURBT according to international guidelines (multifocality, size > 3 cm, recurrent cancer, carcinoma in situ, lymph vascular invasion, histological variant, incomplete and absence of muscle layer at index TURBT). Multivariable cox-regression analysis predicted recurrence and progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 317 patients, 123 (39%) underwent reTURBT, while 194 (61%) did not. Residual disease was detected in 46% of cases, with a 3.2% upstaging rate. Median follow-up was 30 months. The 3-year RFS was higher in patients who underwent reTURBT (79% vs. 58%, p < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in PFS. ReTURBT reduced the risk of recurrence [multivariable hazard ratio: 0.45, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.71]. Among patients who did not undergo reTURBT, those with ≥ 2 risk factors had lower 3-year PFS (73% vs. 92%, p < 0.001) than those with 0-1 risk factor, whereas no difference in 3-year PFS was observed in patients who underwent reTURBT regardless of the number of risk factors (85% vs. 87%, p = 0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ReTURBT demonstrated efficacy in reducing recurrence among patients with TaHG NMIBC, yet its impact on progression remained uncertain. Our study underscores the importance of adhering to current international guidelines, particularly for patients with multiple risk factors indicating necessity for reTURBT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05342-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: There is lack of evidence regarding the indication for re-transurethral resection of bladder tumor (reTURBT) for Ta high grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This study aims to evaluate the oncological outcomes of patients with TaHG NMIBC to determine the benefit from performing reTURBT.
Methods: We relied on a multicenter cohort of 317 TaHG NMIBC from 12 centers who underwent TURBT and a subsequent complete Bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction from 2009 to 2021. Kaplan Meier analyses estimated recurrence free survival (RFS) and progression free survival (PFS) according to reTURBT. Sub-analyses evaluated PFS in patients with multiple risk factors indicating necessity for reTURBT according to international guidelines (multifocality, size > 3 cm, recurrent cancer, carcinoma in situ, lymph vascular invasion, histological variant, incomplete and absence of muscle layer at index TURBT). Multivariable cox-regression analysis predicted recurrence and progression.
Results: Of the 317 patients, 123 (39%) underwent reTURBT, while 194 (61%) did not. Residual disease was detected in 46% of cases, with a 3.2% upstaging rate. Median follow-up was 30 months. The 3-year RFS was higher in patients who underwent reTURBT (79% vs. 58%, p < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in PFS. ReTURBT reduced the risk of recurrence [multivariable hazard ratio: 0.45, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.71]. Among patients who did not undergo reTURBT, those with ≥ 2 risk factors had lower 3-year PFS (73% vs. 92%, p < 0.001) than those with 0-1 risk factor, whereas no difference in 3-year PFS was observed in patients who underwent reTURBT regardless of the number of risk factors (85% vs. 87%, p = 0.8).
Conclusion: ReTURBT demonstrated efficacy in reducing recurrence among patients with TaHG NMIBC, yet its impact on progression remained uncertain. Our study underscores the importance of adhering to current international guidelines, particularly for patients with multiple risk factors indicating necessity for reTURBT.
期刊介绍:
The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.