Efficacy analysis of tip-flexible suction access sheath during flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for unilateral upper urinary tract calculi.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath (TFS-UAS) compared to traditional ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) for unilateral upper urinary tract calculi.

Methods: The study retrospectively compared outcomes from 103 cases using TFS-UAS and 138 using T-UAS treated with FURL for unilateral upper urinary tract calculi from January to October 2023. Assessed parameters included patient demographics, stone characteristics, preoperative urine cultures, ureteral pre-stenting, comorbidities, procedure time, stone-free rate (SFR), utilization of stone retrieval baskets, and postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) rates. The maximum angle of deflection was also measured when the flexible ureteroscope was located in different parts of the TFS-UAS with different diameters in vitro.

Results: The TFS-UAS group achieved a higher Immediate SFR (76.70% vs. 63.77%, p = 0.031) and final SFR (89.32% vs. 73.91%, p = 0.003) than the T-UAS group, especially in the lower calyx stones (80.00% vs. 41.18%, p = 0.018) and upper urinary tract calculi with a cumulative diameter of 2 cm or larger (68.97% vs. 42.11%, p = 0.029). Notably, TFS-UAS with a 10 French (F) inside diameter size achieved a higher SFR (88.57% vs. 70.59%, p = 0.041) and a greater deflection angle than the 12.5 F inside diameter size. No significant variations were observed in the operative duration, hospitalization duration and the occurrence of SIRS between the compared cohorts.

Conclusion: TFS-UAS significantly improves SFR in FURL treatment of unilateral upper urinary tract calculi, particularly for stones located in the lower calyx or with a cumulative diameter of 2 cm or greater, compared to T-UAS.