Enhanced inhibitory input to triceps brachii in humans with spinal cord injury

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Carley L. P. Butler, Sina Sangari, Bing Chen, Monica A. Perez
{"title":"Enhanced inhibitory input to triceps brachii in humans with spinal cord injury","authors":"Carley L. P. Butler,&nbsp;Sina Sangari,&nbsp;Bing Chen,&nbsp;Monica A. Perez","doi":"10.1113/JP285510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <div>Most individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) show increased muscle weakness in the elbow extensor compared to elbow flexor muscles. Although this is a well-known functional deficit, the underlying neural mechanisms remain poorly understood. To address this question, we measured the suppression of voluntary electromyographic activity (svEMG; a measurement thought to reflect changes in intracortical inhibition) by applying low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation over the arm representation of the primary motor cortex during 10% of isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) into elbow flexion or extension in individuals with and without chronic cervical SCI. We found that the svEMG latency and duration were not different between the biceps and triceps brachii in controls but prolonged in the triceps in individuals with SCI. The svEMG area was larger in the triceps compared to the biceps in both groups and further increased in SCI participants, suggesting a pronounced intracortical inhibitory input during elbow extension. A negative correlation was found between svEMG area and MVCs indicating that control and SCI participants with lower svEMG area had larger MVCs. The svEMG area was not different between 5% and 30% of MVC, making it less probable that differences in muscle strength between groups contributed to our results. These findings support the existence of strong inhibitory input to corticospinal projections controlling elbow extensor compared to flexor muscles, which is more pronounced after chronic cervical SCI.\n\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>After cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), people often recover function in elbow flexor, but much less in elbow extensor muscles. The neural mechanisms contributing to this difference remain unknown.</li>\n \n <li>We measured the suppression of voluntary electromyographic activity (svEMG) elicited through low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex (assumed to reflect changes in intracortical inhibition) in the biceps and triceps muscles in controls and individuals with cervical chronic incomplete SCI.</li>\n \n <li>We found increased svEMG area in the triceps compared to the biceps in controls and SCI participants, with this measurement being even more pronounced in the triceps after SCI. The svEMG area correlated with maximal voluntary contraction values in both groups, suggesting the people with lesser inhibition had larger motor output.</li>\n \n <li>Our results support the presence of strong cortical inhibitory input to corticospinal projections controlling elbow extensor compared to elbow flexors muscles after cervical SCI.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":"602 24","pages":"6909-6923"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP285510","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) show increased muscle weakness in the elbow extensor compared to elbow flexor muscles. Although this is a well-known functional deficit, the underlying neural mechanisms remain poorly understood. To address this question, we measured the suppression of voluntary electromyographic activity (svEMG; a measurement thought to reflect changes in intracortical inhibition) by applying low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation over the arm representation of the primary motor cortex during 10% of isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) into elbow flexion or extension in individuals with and without chronic cervical SCI. We found that the svEMG latency and duration were not different between the biceps and triceps brachii in controls but prolonged in the triceps in individuals with SCI. The svEMG area was larger in the triceps compared to the biceps in both groups and further increased in SCI participants, suggesting a pronounced intracortical inhibitory input during elbow extension. A negative correlation was found between svEMG area and MVCs indicating that control and SCI participants with lower svEMG area had larger MVCs. The svEMG area was not different between 5% and 30% of MVC, making it less probable that differences in muscle strength between groups contributed to our results. These findings support the existence of strong inhibitory input to corticospinal projections controlling elbow extensor compared to flexor muscles, which is more pronounced after chronic cervical SCI.

Key points

  • After cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), people often recover function in elbow flexor, but much less in elbow extensor muscles. The neural mechanisms contributing to this difference remain unknown.
  • We measured the suppression of voluntary electromyographic activity (svEMG) elicited through low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex (assumed to reflect changes in intracortical inhibition) in the biceps and triceps muscles in controls and individuals with cervical chronic incomplete SCI.
  • We found increased svEMG area in the triceps compared to the biceps in controls and SCI participants, with this measurement being even more pronounced in the triceps after SCI. The svEMG area correlated with maximal voluntary contraction values in both groups, suggesting the people with lesser inhibition had larger motor output.
  • Our results support the presence of strong cortical inhibitory input to corticospinal projections controlling elbow extensor compared to elbow flexors muscles after cervical SCI.

Abstract Image

脊髓损伤患者肱三头肌的抑制性输入增强。
与肘部屈肌相比,大多数颈椎脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的肘部伸肌肌力更弱。尽管这是一种众所周知的功能缺陷,但其背后的神经机制仍鲜为人知。为了解决这个问题,我们通过对患有和未患有慢性颈椎 SCI 的患者在肘部屈伸 10% 等长最大自主收缩 (MVC) 期间对初级运动皮层的手臂代表区进行低强度经颅磁刺激,测量了自主肌电活动的抑制(svEMG,一种被认为能反映皮层内抑制变化的测量方法)。我们发现,在对照组中,肱二头肌和肱三头肌的 svEMG 潜伏期和持续时间没有差异,但在 SCI 患者中,肱三头肌的 svEMG 潜伏期和持续时间延长。与肱二头肌相比,两组患者肱三头肌的 svEMG 面积都较大,而 SCI 患者的 svEMG 面积进一步增大,这表明肘关节伸展时皮层内抑制性输入明显增加。svEMG 面积与 MVCs 之间呈负相关,表明 svEMG 面积较小的对照组和 SCI 参与者的 MVCs 更大。在 MVC 的 5% 到 30% 之间,svEMG 面积没有差异,因此我们的研究结果不太可能是由于组间肌力差异造成的。这些研究结果表明,与屈肌相比,控制肘部伸肌的皮质脊髓投射存在较强的抑制性输入,这在慢性颈椎损伤后更为明显。要点颈椎脊髓损伤(SCI)后,肘部屈肌的功能通常都能恢复,但肘部伸肌的功能却很难恢复。造成这种差异的神经机制仍然未知。我们测量了通过低强度经颅磁刺激初级运动皮层(假定反映皮层内抑制的变化)引起的对照组和颈椎慢性不完全脊髓损伤患者肱二头肌和肱三头肌自主肌电活动抑制(svEMG)。我们发现,在对照组和 SCI 患者中,肱三头肌的 svEMG 面积比肱二头肌增大,而 SCI 后肱三头肌的这一测量结果更为明显。这两组人的 svEMG 面积都与最大自主收缩值相关,表明抑制较少的人运动输出量更大。我们的研究结果表明,与肘关节屈肌相比,颈椎 SCI 后控制肘关节伸肌的皮质脊髓投射存在较强的皮质抑制输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信