Advance care planning towards the end of life.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Print Date: 2024-11-05 DOI:10.4045/tidsskr.24.0105
Hege Ihle-Hansen, Håkon Ihle-Hansen, Siri Rostoft, John Munkhaugen, Siri Ferden Westbye, Maria Romøren, Trygve Johannes Lereim Sævareid, Linn Brøderud, Karin Berg Hermansen, Marie Hamilton Larsen, Astrid Klopstad Wahl, Marc Ahmed, Reidar Pedersen
{"title":"Advance care planning towards the end of life.","authors":"Hege Ihle-Hansen, Håkon Ihle-Hansen, Siri Rostoft, John Munkhaugen, Siri Ferden Westbye, Maria Romøren, Trygve Johannes Lereim Sævareid, Linn Brøderud, Karin Berg Hermansen, Marie Hamilton Larsen, Astrid Klopstad Wahl, Marc Ahmed, Reidar Pedersen","doi":"10.4045/tidsskr.24.0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New national clinical guidelines are now available on advance care planning (ACP). Confidence in communication is important for implementation of the guidelines. This study aims to identify healthcare personnel's self-perceived confidence in communication about future medical care and patients' wishes at the end of life.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>Healthcare personnel in twelve geriatric units in South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority responded to an online questionnaire survey in autumn 2022. The four response alternatives for self-reported confidence - 'unconfident', 'fairly confident', 'very confident' and 'extremely confident'- are combined into two categories: 'limited confidence' ('unconfident' and 'fairly confident') and 'high confidence' ('very confident' and 'extremely confident').</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received responses from 289 of the 470 (61.5 %) invited, with an average age of 37.8 ± 11.3 years, of whom 217 out of 289 (75 %) had more than five years of professional experience. Of the doctors, 15 out of 67 (22 %) reported limited confidence in communication about 'future deterioration of the patient's health condition', 20 out of 67 (30 %) about 'life-sustaining treatment' and 13 out of 67 (19 %) about 'preferences towards the end of life'. For other healthcare personnel, the corresponding responses were 119 out of 222 (54 %), 140 out of 222 (63 %) and 109 out of 222 (49 %).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Self-assessed confidence in communication about future deterioration, future medical care and the patient's own wishes at the end of life varies, and such confidence is limited among many health personnel in geriatric units. Measures appear to be needed to increase confidence in the communication and implementation of ACP in the Norwegian health service.</p>","PeriodicalId":23123,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.24.0105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: New national clinical guidelines are now available on advance care planning (ACP). Confidence in communication is important for implementation of the guidelines. This study aims to identify healthcare personnel's self-perceived confidence in communication about future medical care and patients' wishes at the end of life.

Material and method: Healthcare personnel in twelve geriatric units in South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority responded to an online questionnaire survey in autumn 2022. The four response alternatives for self-reported confidence - 'unconfident', 'fairly confident', 'very confident' and 'extremely confident'- are combined into two categories: 'limited confidence' ('unconfident' and 'fairly confident') and 'high confidence' ('very confident' and 'extremely confident').

Results: We received responses from 289 of the 470 (61.5 %) invited, with an average age of 37.8 ± 11.3 years, of whom 217 out of 289 (75 %) had more than five years of professional experience. Of the doctors, 15 out of 67 (22 %) reported limited confidence in communication about 'future deterioration of the patient's health condition', 20 out of 67 (30 %) about 'life-sustaining treatment' and 13 out of 67 (19 %) about 'preferences towards the end of life'. For other healthcare personnel, the corresponding responses were 119 out of 222 (54 %), 140 out of 222 (63 %) and 109 out of 222 (49 %).

Interpretation: Self-assessed confidence in communication about future deterioration, future medical care and the patient's own wishes at the end of life varies, and such confidence is limited among many health personnel in geriatric units. Measures appear to be needed to increase confidence in the communication and implementation of ACP in the Norwegian health service.

临终护理规划。
背景:关于预先护理计划 (ACP) 的新国家临床指南现已出台。沟通方面的信心对于指南的实施非常重要。本研究旨在确定医护人员在就未来医疗护理和患者临终时的愿望进行沟通时的自我认知信心:挪威东南部地区卫生局12个老年病科的医护人员对2022年秋季的在线问卷调查做出了答复。自我报告信心的四个备选回答--"不自信"、"比较自信"、"非常自信 "和 "非常自信"--合并为两个类别:"有限信心"("不自信 "和 "比较自信")和 "高度信心"("非常自信 "和 "非常自信"):我们收到了 470 位受邀者中 289 位(61.5%)的回复,他们的平均年龄为 37.8 ± 11.3 岁,其中 217 位(75%)拥有五年以上的专业经验。在医生中,67 人中有 15 人(22%)表示对 "患者未来健康状况恶化 "的沟通信心有限,67 人中有 20 人(30%)表示对 "维持生命的治疗 "信心有限,67 人中有 13 人(19%)表示对 "生命末期的偏好 "信心有限。对于其他医护人员,222 人中有 119 人(54%)、222 人中有 140 人(63%)和 222 人中有 109 人(49%)做出了相应回答:解释:对于未来病情恶化、未来医疗护理和患者本人临终时的意愿等方面的沟通,自我评估的信心各不相同,老年病科的许多医护人员的信心也很有限。看来有必要采取措施,增强挪威医疗服务机构在沟通和实施ACP方面的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening
Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
593
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信