Baseline Impulse Oscillometry Metrics Differentiate Asthmatic Children From Non-Asthmatic Children Across Ethnicity/Race: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Iris Kim, Hye-Won Shin, Stanley Galant
{"title":"Baseline Impulse Oscillometry Metrics Differentiate Asthmatic Children From Non-Asthmatic Children Across Ethnicity/Race: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Iris Kim, Hye-Won Shin, Stanley Galant","doi":"10.1002/ppul.27389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identifying the asthmatic early to prevent permanent airway remodeling and the progression of the disease is desirable. In children, baseline impulse oscillometry has been found effective in identifying asthma in some studies but not others.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of our study was to utilize a meta-analysis to determine whether there were significant peripheral airway differences between asthmatic and non-asthmatic children across ethnicity/race, utilizing baseline impulse oscillometry (IOS) to establish its usefulness as a diagnostic tool in this age group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a comprehensive search of published literature on pediatric oscillometric studies evaluating younger children (mean age ranging from 4.3 to 6 years) and older children (mean age ranging from 8.7 to 11.4 years) from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Middle East. Inclusion criteria required the primary variable resistance at 5 Hertz (R5) (kPa/L/s) or (cmH<sub>2</sub>O/L/s) for both control and asthmatic subjects, and excluded studies if asthmatics had uncontrolled disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our data show that there are significantly higher R5 and area of reactance (AX) and lower reactance at 5 Hertz (X5) in both younger and older asthmatic children compared to healthy controls from various countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis firmly establishes that baseline oscillometry metrics, resistance and reactance, are effective in identifying the asthmatic child across age and the ethnicities/races evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Identifying the asthmatic early to prevent permanent airway remodeling and the progression of the disease is desirable. In children, baseline impulse oscillometry has been found effective in identifying asthma in some studies but not others.

Objective: The purpose of our study was to utilize a meta-analysis to determine whether there were significant peripheral airway differences between asthmatic and non-asthmatic children across ethnicity/race, utilizing baseline impulse oscillometry (IOS) to establish its usefulness as a diagnostic tool in this age group.

Methods: This was a comprehensive search of published literature on pediatric oscillometric studies evaluating younger children (mean age ranging from 4.3 to 6 years) and older children (mean age ranging from 8.7 to 11.4 years) from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Middle East. Inclusion criteria required the primary variable resistance at 5 Hertz (R5) (kPa/L/s) or (cmH2O/L/s) for both control and asthmatic subjects, and excluded studies if asthmatics had uncontrolled disease.

Results: Our data show that there are significantly higher R5 and area of reactance (AX) and lower reactance at 5 Hertz (X5) in both younger and older asthmatic children compared to healthy controls from various countries.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis firmly establishes that baseline oscillometry metrics, resistance and reactance, are effective in identifying the asthmatic child across age and the ethnicities/races evaluated.

基线脉冲振荡测量指标区分不同民族/种族的哮喘儿童和非哮喘儿童:一项 Meta 分析。
前言尽早发现哮喘患者以防止永久性气道重塑和疾病进展是可取的。在一些研究中,基线脉冲振荡测量法被认为能有效识别儿童哮喘,但在另一些研究中却不能:我们的研究旨在利用荟萃分析法确定不同种族/人种的哮喘儿童和非哮喘儿童之间是否存在明显的外周气道差异,并利用基线脉冲振荡测量法(IOS)确定其作为该年龄组诊断工具的实用性:这是对美国、欧洲、亚洲和中东地区已发表的儿科示波测量研究文献的一次全面检索,这些研究评估了年龄较小的儿童(平均年龄为 4.3 至 6 岁)和年龄较大的儿童(平均年龄为 8.7 至 11.4 岁)。纳入标准要求对照组和哮喘受试者在 5 赫兹(R5)时的主要可变阻力(kPa/L/s)或(cmH2O/L/s),如果哮喘患者的病情未得到控制,则排除研究:我们的数据显示,与来自不同国家的健康对照组相比,年龄较小和年龄较大的哮喘儿童的 R5 和反应面积 (AX) 明显较高,而 5 赫兹时的反应 (X5) 则较低:这项荟萃分析证实,基线振荡测量指标(阻力和电抗)能有效识别不同年龄段和不同种族的哮喘儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信