Predicting Post-Mortem α-Synuclein Pathology by the Combined Presence of Probable REM sleep behavior disorder and Hyposmia.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cécilia Tremblay, Charles H Adler, Holly A Shill, Erika Driver-Dunckley, Shyamal Mehta, Parichita Choudhury, Christine Belden, David R Shprecher, Joyce K Lee-Iannotti, Alireza Atri, Geidy E Serrano, Thomas G Beach
{"title":"Predicting Post-Mortem α-Synuclein Pathology by the Combined Presence of Probable REM sleep behavior disorder and Hyposmia.","authors":"Cécilia Tremblay, Charles H Adler, Holly A Shill, Erika Driver-Dunckley, Shyamal Mehta, Parichita Choudhury, Christine Belden, David R Shprecher, Joyce K Lee-Iannotti, Alireza Atri, Geidy E Serrano, Thomas G Beach","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a strong known predictor of a final clinicopathological diagnosis of a Lewy type α-synucleinopathy (LTS). Olfactory dysfunction is an early symptom of synucleinopathies and has been repeatedly associated with the presence of post-mortem LTS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the combined value of a clinician diagnosis of probable RBD (PRBD) and hyposmia in predicting the post-mortem presence of LTS in a broader, less-selected, volunteer elderly population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 652 autopsied subjects from the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders, which were evaluated for PRBD, had completed annual movement and cognitive assessments, and had at least one the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) olfactory test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histological evidence of LTS was significantly more frequent in those who had PRBD (112/152: 73.7%) than those without (177/494: 35.8%) (P < 0.001). LTS was more frequent in cases with PRBD and a low UPSIT score (90.8%) compared to cases with PRBD only (73.7%) (P < 0.001) or cases with a low UPSIT score only (69.4%) (P < 0.001). Sensitivity of PRBD diagnosis for predicting LTS was 38.8% and specificity 88.8%, whereas sensitivity of a low UPSIT score was 74.4% and specificity 73.4% (Youden's index = 0.276 for PRBD, 0.478 for UPSIT). When combining both measures, sensitivity was 34.3% and specificity increased to 97.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRBD, diagnosed without sleep study confirmation, combined with a reduced olfactory performance is highly specific for predicting post-mortem presence of LTS. The combination of both measures may provide a cost-effective means of predicting LTS in a broader community.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a strong known predictor of a final clinicopathological diagnosis of a Lewy type α-synucleinopathy (LTS). Olfactory dysfunction is an early symptom of synucleinopathies and has been repeatedly associated with the presence of post-mortem LTS.

Objective: To assess the combined value of a clinician diagnosis of probable RBD (PRBD) and hyposmia in predicting the post-mortem presence of LTS in a broader, less-selected, volunteer elderly population.

Methods: We studied 652 autopsied subjects from the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders, which were evaluated for PRBD, had completed annual movement and cognitive assessments, and had at least one the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) olfactory test.

Results: Histological evidence of LTS was significantly more frequent in those who had PRBD (112/152: 73.7%) than those without (177/494: 35.8%) (P < 0.001). LTS was more frequent in cases with PRBD and a low UPSIT score (90.8%) compared to cases with PRBD only (73.7%) (P < 0.001) or cases with a low UPSIT score only (69.4%) (P < 0.001). Sensitivity of PRBD diagnosis for predicting LTS was 38.8% and specificity 88.8%, whereas sensitivity of a low UPSIT score was 74.4% and specificity 73.4% (Youden's index = 0.276 for PRBD, 0.478 for UPSIT). When combining both measures, sensitivity was 34.3% and specificity increased to 97.2%.

Conclusion: PRBD, diagnosed without sleep study confirmation, combined with a reduced olfactory performance is highly specific for predicting post-mortem presence of LTS. The combination of both measures may provide a cost-effective means of predicting LTS in a broader community.

通过同时出现可能的快速眼动睡眠障碍和嗅觉减退来预测死后α-突触核蛋白病理变化
背景:特发性快速眼动睡眠行为障碍(RBD已知特发性快速眼动睡眠行为障碍(RBD)是路易型α-突触核蛋白病(LTS)最终临床病理诊断的有力预测因素。嗅觉功能障碍是突触核蛋白病的早期症状,并多次与死后路易型突触核蛋白病相关:目的:评估临床医生诊断的可能RBD(PRBD)和嗅觉减退在预测更广泛、选择较少的志愿者老年人群中死后出现LTS的综合价值:我们研究了亚利桑那州衰老和神经退行性疾病研究中的 652 名尸检对象,他们接受了 PRBD 评估,完成了年度运动和认知评估,并进行了至少一次宾夕法尼亚大学气味识别测试(UPSIT)嗅觉测试:患有 PRBD 的患者(112/152:73.7%)明显比未患有 PRBD 的患者(177/494:35.8%)更容易出现 LTS 组织学证据(P 结论:PRBD 患者的 LTS 组织学证据比未患有 PRBD 的患者多得多:未经睡眠研究确认而诊断出的 PRBD 与嗅觉功能减退相结合,可高度特异性地预测死后是否存在 LTS。将这两种测量方法结合起来,可为更广泛的社区预测 LTS 提供一种经济有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信