Dennis G Moledina, Kyra Shelton, Steven Menez, Abinet M Aklilu, Yu Yamamoto, Bashar A Kadhim, Melissa Shaw, Candice Kent, Amrita Makhijani, David Hu, Michael Simonov, Kyle O'Connor, Jack Bitzel, Heather Thiessen-Philbrook, F Perry Wilson, Chirag R Parikh
{"title":"External Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Diagnostic Model for Histological Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis.","authors":"Dennis G Moledina, Kyra Shelton, Steven Menez, Abinet M Aklilu, Yu Yamamoto, Bashar A Kadhim, Melissa Shaw, Candice Kent, Amrita Makhijani, David Hu, Michael Simonov, Kyle O'Connor, Jack Bitzel, Heather Thiessen-Philbrook, F Perry Wilson, Chirag R Parikh","doi":"10.1681/ASN.0000000556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate diagnosis of acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (AIN) often requires a kidney biopsy. We previously developed a diagnostic statistical model for predicting biopsy-confirmed AIN by combining four laboratory tests after evaluating over 150 potential predictors from the electronic health record. Here, we validate this diagnostic model in two biopsy-based cohorts at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and Yale, which were geographically and temporally distinct from the development cohort, respectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed patients who underwent kidney biopsy at JHH and Yale University (2019-2023). We assessed discrimination (AUC) and calibration using previously derived model coefficients and recalibrated the model using an intercept correction factor that accounted for differences in baseline prevalence of AIN between development and validation cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1982 participants: 1454 at JHH and 528 at Yale. JHH (5%) and Yale (17%) had lower proportions of biopsies with AIN than the development set (23%). The AUC was 0.73 (0.66-0.79) at JHH and 0.73 (0.67-0.78) at Yale, similar to the development set (0.73 (0.64-0.81)). Calibration was imperfect in validation cohorts, particularly at JHH, but improved with application of an intercept correction factor. The model increased AUC of clinicians' prebiopsy suspicion for AIN by 0.10 to 0.77 (0.71-0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An AIN diagnostic model retained discrimination in two validation cohorts but needed recalibration to account for local AIN prevalence. The model improved clinicians' ability to predict AIN.</p>","PeriodicalId":17217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.0000000556","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Accurate diagnosis of acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (AIN) often requires a kidney biopsy. We previously developed a diagnostic statistical model for predicting biopsy-confirmed AIN by combining four laboratory tests after evaluating over 150 potential predictors from the electronic health record. Here, we validate this diagnostic model in two biopsy-based cohorts at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and Yale, which were geographically and temporally distinct from the development cohort, respectively.
Methods: We analyzed patients who underwent kidney biopsy at JHH and Yale University (2019-2023). We assessed discrimination (AUC) and calibration using previously derived model coefficients and recalibrated the model using an intercept correction factor that accounted for differences in baseline prevalence of AIN between development and validation cohorts.
Results: We included 1982 participants: 1454 at JHH and 528 at Yale. JHH (5%) and Yale (17%) had lower proportions of biopsies with AIN than the development set (23%). The AUC was 0.73 (0.66-0.79) at JHH and 0.73 (0.67-0.78) at Yale, similar to the development set (0.73 (0.64-0.81)). Calibration was imperfect in validation cohorts, particularly at JHH, but improved with application of an intercept correction factor. The model increased AUC of clinicians' prebiopsy suspicion for AIN by 0.10 to 0.77 (0.71-0.82).
Conclusions: An AIN diagnostic model retained discrimination in two validation cohorts but needed recalibration to account for local AIN prevalence. The model improved clinicians' ability to predict AIN.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN) stands as the preeminent kidney journal globally, offering an exceptional synthesis of cutting-edge basic research, clinical epidemiology, meta-analysis, and relevant editorial content. Representing a comprehensive resource, JASN encompasses clinical research, editorials distilling key findings, perspectives, and timely reviews.
Editorials are skillfully crafted to elucidate the essential insights of the parent article, while JASN actively encourages the submission of Letters to the Editor discussing recently published articles. The reviews featured in JASN are consistently erudite and comprehensive, providing thorough coverage of respective fields. Since its inception in July 1990, JASN has been a monthly publication.
JASN publishes original research reports and editorial content across a spectrum of basic and clinical science relevant to the broad discipline of nephrology. Topics covered include renal cell biology, developmental biology of the kidney, genetics of kidney disease, cell and transport physiology, hemodynamics and vascular regulation, mechanisms of blood pressure regulation, renal immunology, kidney pathology, pathophysiology of kidney diseases, nephrolithiasis, clinical nephrology (including dialysis and transplantation), and hypertension. Furthermore, articles addressing healthcare policy and care delivery issues relevant to nephrology are warmly welcomed.