Bolstering the Prognostic Utility of Coronary Risk Assessments with PAI: A Physical Activity Metric.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Javaid Nauman, Tania Mirzaamin, Barry A Franklin, Bjarne M Nes, Carl J Lavie, Patrick Dunn, Ross Arena, Chi Pang Wen, Atefe R Tari, Ulrik Wisløff
{"title":"Bolstering the Prognostic Utility of Coronary Risk Assessments with PAI: A Physical Activity Metric.","authors":"Javaid Nauman, Tania Mirzaamin, Barry A Franklin, Bjarne M Nes, Carl J Lavie, Patrick Dunn, Ross Arena, Chi Pang Wen, Atefe R Tari, Ulrik Wisløff","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Personal Activity Intelligence (PAI) translates heart rate during physical activity (PA) into a weekly score, that credits vigorous over low- and moderate intensity PA. We prospectively investigated the association between PAI and fatal and non-fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) in self-reported healthy participants from Norway, with specific reference to improving the accuracy of conventional coronary risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 40 961 healthy adults (56% women) from the population based Trøndelag Health Study (the HUNT study). Individual data were linked to hospital and cause of death registries. The weekly PAI score of each participant was divided into four groups (PAI scores of 0, ≤50, 51-99, or ≥ 100). Adjusted hazard ratios [aHRs] and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for fatal and non-fatal CHD related to PAI were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up period of 13.1 years (IQR, 12.7-13.6), 3303 (3109 non-fatal, 194 fatal) CHD events occurred. Compared with the inactive group (0 PAI), weekly PAI scores at baseline of 51-99 and ≥ 100 were associated with a lower risk of CHD [0.80 (0.71-0.91) and 0.86 (0.78-0.95), respectively]. By adding PAI to traditional risk factors, the net reclassification improvement of CHD was 0.472 (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PAI was inversely associated with CHD risk among healthy participants at baseline, and it's cardioprotective effect persisted across diverse risk factor profiles. A PAI score > 50 was substantially associated with a reduced risk of CHD. These findings have implications for improving the accuracy of conventional coronary risk assessments with PAI.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003584","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Personal Activity Intelligence (PAI) translates heart rate during physical activity (PA) into a weekly score, that credits vigorous over low- and moderate intensity PA. We prospectively investigated the association between PAI and fatal and non-fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) in self-reported healthy participants from Norway, with specific reference to improving the accuracy of conventional coronary risk assessment.

Methods: We studied 40 961 healthy adults (56% women) from the population based Trøndelag Health Study (the HUNT study). Individual data were linked to hospital and cause of death registries. The weekly PAI score of each participant was divided into four groups (PAI scores of 0, ≤50, 51-99, or ≥ 100). Adjusted hazard ratios [aHRs] and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for fatal and non-fatal CHD related to PAI were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses.

Results: During a median follow-up period of 13.1 years (IQR, 12.7-13.6), 3303 (3109 non-fatal, 194 fatal) CHD events occurred. Compared with the inactive group (0 PAI), weekly PAI scores at baseline of 51-99 and ≥ 100 were associated with a lower risk of CHD [0.80 (0.71-0.91) and 0.86 (0.78-0.95), respectively]. By adding PAI to traditional risk factors, the net reclassification improvement of CHD was 0.472 (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: PAI was inversely associated with CHD risk among healthy participants at baseline, and it's cardioprotective effect persisted across diverse risk factor profiles. A PAI score > 50 was substantially associated with a reduced risk of CHD. These findings have implications for improving the accuracy of conventional coronary risk assessments with PAI.

用 PAI 增强冠状动脉风险评估的预后效用:体育锻炼指标。
目的:个人活动智能(PAI)将体力活动(PA)过程中的心率转化为每周得分,将剧烈体力活动与低强度和中等强度体力活动进行比较。我们对挪威自我报告的健康参与者进行了前瞻性调查,研究了 PAI 与致命和非致命冠心病(CHD)之间的关系,特别是在提高传统冠心病风险评估的准确性方面:我们研究了 40 961 名健康成年人(56% 为女性),他们来自以人口为基础的特伦德拉格健康研究(HUNT 研究)。个人数据与医院和死因登记相关联。每位参与者的每周 PAI 得分为四组(PAI 得分为 0、≤50、51-99 或≥100)。使用 Cox 比例危险回归分析估算了与 PAI 相关的致命性和非致命性冠心病的调整危险比 [aHRs] 和 95% 置信区间 (CIs):在中位 13.1 年(IQR,12.7-13.6)的随访期间,共发生了 3303 例(非致命 3109 例,致命 194 例)冠心病事件。与非活跃组(PAI 为 0)相比,基线时每周 PAI 评分为 51-99 分和≥100 分的人群罹患冠心病的风险较低[分别为 0.80 (0.71-0.91) 和 0.86 (0.78-0.95)]。将 PAI 加入传统风险因素后,CHD 的净重新分类改善率为 0.472(P < 0.001):结论:PAI 与基线健康参与者的冠心病风险成反比,在不同的风险因素情况下,其心脏保护作用持续存在。PAI得分大于50与冠心病风险降低有很大关系。这些发现对利用 PAI 提高传统冠状动脉风险评估的准确性具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信