High mechanical thrombectomy procedural volume is not a reliable predictor of improved thrombectomy outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the United States.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Adnan I Qureshi, Hamza Maqsood, Daniel E Ford, Camilo R Gomez, Daniel F Hanley, Ameer E Hassan, Thanh N Nguyen, Farhan Siddiq, Alejandro M Spiotta, Syed F Zaidi, Chun Shing Kwok
{"title":"High mechanical thrombectomy procedural volume is not a reliable predictor of improved thrombectomy outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the United States.","authors":"Adnan I Qureshi, Hamza Maqsood, Daniel E Ford, Camilo R Gomez, Daniel F Hanley, Ameer E Hassan, Thanh N Nguyen, Farhan Siddiq, Alejandro M Spiotta, Syed F Zaidi, Chun Shing Kwok","doi":"10.1177/15910199241288611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The volume of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) performed at hospitals is used as one of the criteria for advanced-level designation for stroke care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study sought to determine the relationship between annual MT procedural volume and in-hospital outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing MT in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020. The hospitals were grouped into quartiles based on the volume of MT procedures performed within the calendar year. We compared the rates of routine discharge/home health care; in-hospital mortality, and post-treatment intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) between the quartiles after adjusting for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients undergoing MT ranged from 15,395 in quartile 1 to 78,510 MT in quartile 4. There were lower rates of discharge home/self-care of 22.5%, 20.8%, and 20.8% for quartiles 2, 3, and 4, respectively, compared with 34.9% in quartile 1. The odds of ICH increased to 1.81 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), 1.84 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and 1.98 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) among the quartiles from lowest to highest procedural volumes. The odds of home discharge/self-care decreased to 0.66 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), 0.60 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and 0.63 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) among the quartiles from lowest to highest procedural volumes. The odds of in-hospital mortality increased to 1.92 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), 1.99 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and 1.84 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) among the quartiles from lowest to highest procedural volumes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed a paradoxical relationship between adverse outcomes and the annual procedural volume of MT at the hospital presumably due to the higher severity of acute ischemic stroke treated at high-volume hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241288611","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The volume of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) performed at hospitals is used as one of the criteria for advanced-level designation for stroke care.

Objective: Our study sought to determine the relationship between annual MT procedural volume and in-hospital outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing MT in the United States.

Methods: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020. The hospitals were grouped into quartiles based on the volume of MT procedures performed within the calendar year. We compared the rates of routine discharge/home health care; in-hospital mortality, and post-treatment intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) between the quartiles after adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: Patients undergoing MT ranged from 15,395 in quartile 1 to 78,510 MT in quartile 4. There were lower rates of discharge home/self-care of 22.5%, 20.8%, and 20.8% for quartiles 2, 3, and 4, respectively, compared with 34.9% in quartile 1. The odds of ICH increased to 1.81 (p < 0.001), 1.84 (p < 0.001), and 1.98 (p < 0.001) among the quartiles from lowest to highest procedural volumes. The odds of home discharge/self-care decreased to 0.66 (p < 0.001), 0.60 (p < 0.001), and 0.63 (p < 0.001) among the quartiles from lowest to highest procedural volumes. The odds of in-hospital mortality increased to 1.92 (p < 0.001), 1.99 (p < 0.001), and 1.84 (p < 0.001) among the quartiles from lowest to highest procedural volumes.

Conclusions: We observed a paradoxical relationship between adverse outcomes and the annual procedural volume of MT at the hospital presumably due to the higher severity of acute ischemic stroke treated at high-volume hospitals.

在美国,机械血栓切除术的手术量大并不能可靠地预测急性缺血性中风患者的血栓切除效果。
背景:医院实施机械血栓切除术(MT)的数量被用作卒中治疗高级认证的标准之一:我们的研究旨在确定美国接受机械取栓术的急性缺血性卒中患者的年度机械取栓术手术量与院内预后之间的关系:我们分析了 2016 年至 2020 年的全国住院患者样本。方法:我们对 2016 年至 2020 年的全国住院患者样本进行了分析,根据历年内进行的 MT 手术量将医院分为四等分。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整后,我们比较了四分位数之间的常规出院/居家保健率、院内死亡率和治疗后颅内出血(ICH)率:接受MT治疗的患者从四分位数1的15,395人到四分位数4的78,510人不等。与四分位数 1 的 34.9% 相比,四分位数 2、3 和 4 的出院回家/自理率分别为 22.5%、20.8% 和 20.8%。我们观察到不良后果与医院 MT 年手术量之间存在矛盾关系,这可能是由于高手术量医院治疗的急性缺血性卒中严重程度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信