Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms.

IF 0.5 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
International Journal of Angiology Pub Date : 2024-05-30 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787304
Andrew J Gorton, Suresh Keshavamurthy, Sibu P Saha
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms.","authors":"Andrew J Gorton, Suresh Keshavamurthy, Sibu P Saha","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The thoracic aorta is a dynamic structure composed of the aortic root, ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta. It is subject to the pressure and volume of the cardiac cycle and susceptible to atherosclerotic and aneurysmal changes. With these changes, the risk for acute aortic syndromes increases, thus creating the impetus for earlier interventions. The previous standard of open surgical repair has undergone a transition in recent years toward endovascular repair being favored in the descending and abdominal aortas with ongoing investigation into approaches for the ascending and aortic arch. These therapies have been shown to improve early mortality and morbidity outcomes with the caveat of more interventions compared with open surgery. We undertook this review to analyze the current data available regarding long-term outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular repair for thoracic aortic disease. The data support long-term benefit of endovascular repair for thoracic aortic disease. The primary indications identified for reintervention are endoleak and further aneurysmal degeneration. As the devices available for endovascular repair evolve, ongoing review of these outcomes will be necessary. It will also be important to trend the results as further techniques become available for endovascular repair of the ascending aorta and aortic arch.</p>","PeriodicalId":13798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Angiology","volume":"33 4","pages":"237-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The thoracic aorta is a dynamic structure composed of the aortic root, ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta. It is subject to the pressure and volume of the cardiac cycle and susceptible to atherosclerotic and aneurysmal changes. With these changes, the risk for acute aortic syndromes increases, thus creating the impetus for earlier interventions. The previous standard of open surgical repair has undergone a transition in recent years toward endovascular repair being favored in the descending and abdominal aortas with ongoing investigation into approaches for the ascending and aortic arch. These therapies have been shown to improve early mortality and morbidity outcomes with the caveat of more interventions compared with open surgery. We undertook this review to analyze the current data available regarding long-term outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular repair for thoracic aortic disease. The data support long-term benefit of endovascular repair for thoracic aortic disease. The primary indications identified for reintervention are endoleak and further aneurysmal degeneration. As the devices available for endovascular repair evolve, ongoing review of these outcomes will be necessary. It will also be important to trend the results as further techniques become available for endovascular repair of the ascending aorta and aortic arch.

胸主动脉瘤血管内修复术的长期疗效。
胸主动脉是一个动态结构,由主动脉根部、升主动脉、主动脉弓和降主动脉组成。它受心脏循环压力和容量的影响,容易发生动脉粥样硬化和动脉瘤变化。随着这些变化,急性主动脉综合征的风险也随之增加,因此需要尽早进行干预。近年来,以往的开放性手术修复标准已向血管内修复过渡,降主动脉和腹主动脉更受青睐,而升主动脉和主动脉弓的修复方法也在不断研究中。这些疗法已被证明能改善早期死亡率和发病率,但需要注意的是,与开放手术相比,需要更多的介入治疗。我们撰写了这篇综述,旨在分析目前有关胸主动脉疾病患者接受血管内修复术后长期疗效的数据。数据支持胸主动脉疾病血管内修复术的长期疗效。再次介入治疗的主要适应症是内漏和动脉瘤进一步变性。随着可用于血管内修复的设备不断发展,有必要对这些结果进行持续审查。此外,随着升主动脉和主动脉弓血管内修复技术的进一步发展,对结果进行趋势分析也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Angiology
International Journal of Angiology PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信