Separation of Lung Cancer Cells From Mixed Cell Samples Using Aptamer-Modified Magnetic Beads and Permalloy Micromagnets

IF 3 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Shu-Hui Lin, Yun-Jung Tsai, Tzu-Cheng Su, Shih-Lun Lai, Chun-Ping Jen
{"title":"Separation of Lung Cancer Cells From Mixed Cell Samples Using Aptamer-Modified Magnetic Beads and Permalloy Micromagnets","authors":"Shu-Hui Lin,&nbsp;Yun-Jung Tsai,&nbsp;Tzu-Cheng Su,&nbsp;Shih-Lun Lai,&nbsp;Chun-Ping Jen","doi":"10.1002/elps.202400147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study involved the design and fabrication of a microfluidic chip integrated with permalloy micromagnets. The device was used with aptamer-modified magnetic beads (MBs) of various sizes to successfully separate lung cancer cells from a mixture of other cells. The overall separation efficiency was evaluated based on the ratios of cells in the different outlets and inlets of the chip. The results showed efficiencies ranging from 43.4% to 50.2% for MB sizes between 1.36 and 4.50 µm. Interestingly, efficiency slightly decreased as the size of the MBs increased, contrary to predictions. Further examination revealed that larger MBs exerted gravitational force on the cell-bound MBs at low flow rates, causing the targets to settle before reaching the main microchannel region. This was attributed to fluidic resistance caused by a size mismatch between the inlet tube and the microfluidic conduit. An increase in cell accumulation at the inlet was observed with larger MB sizes due to gravity. Therefore, the definition of effective separation efficiency was revised to exclude the effect of cell accumulation at the inlet. Effective separation efficiencies were found to be 71.6%, 76.4%, and 79.4% for MB sizes of 1.36, 3.00, and 4.50 µm, respectively. The study concluded that larger MBs interacted more with the magnetic force, resulting in better separation. However, cells with smaller MBs were more likely to evade the magnetic force. The investigation provides valuable insights into isolating lung cancer cells using this method, with the potential for clinical application in cancer diagnosis and treatment.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":"45 21-22","pages":"2054-2064"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/elps.202400147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study involved the design and fabrication of a microfluidic chip integrated with permalloy micromagnets. The device was used with aptamer-modified magnetic beads (MBs) of various sizes to successfully separate lung cancer cells from a mixture of other cells. The overall separation efficiency was evaluated based on the ratios of cells in the different outlets and inlets of the chip. The results showed efficiencies ranging from 43.4% to 50.2% for MB sizes between 1.36 and 4.50 µm. Interestingly, efficiency slightly decreased as the size of the MBs increased, contrary to predictions. Further examination revealed that larger MBs exerted gravitational force on the cell-bound MBs at low flow rates, causing the targets to settle before reaching the main microchannel region. This was attributed to fluidic resistance caused by a size mismatch between the inlet tube and the microfluidic conduit. An increase in cell accumulation at the inlet was observed with larger MB sizes due to gravity. Therefore, the definition of effective separation efficiency was revised to exclude the effect of cell accumulation at the inlet. Effective separation efficiencies were found to be 71.6%, 76.4%, and 79.4% for MB sizes of 1.36, 3.00, and 4.50 µm, respectively. The study concluded that larger MBs interacted more with the magnetic force, resulting in better separation. However, cells with smaller MBs were more likely to evade the magnetic force. The investigation provides valuable insights into isolating lung cancer cells using this method, with the potential for clinical application in cancer diagnosis and treatment.

使用 Aptamer 改性磁珠和坡莫合金微磁体从混合细胞样本中分离肺癌细胞
这项研究涉及设计和制造一种集成了高铝合金微磁体的微流体芯片。该装置与不同大小的适配体修饰磁珠(MBs)配合使用,成功地将肺癌细胞从其他细胞混合物中分离出来。根据芯片不同出口和入口的细胞比例,对整体分离效率进行了评估。结果显示,尺寸在 1.36 至 4.50 微米之间的 MB 的分离效率为 43.4% 至 50.2%。有趣的是,与预测相反,随着 MB 大小的增加,效率略有下降。进一步检查发现,较大的 MB 在低流速下对细胞结合的 MB 产生引力,导致目标在到达主微通道区域之前沉降。这归因于入口管和微流体导管之间的尺寸不匹配造成的流体阻力。由于重力作用,当 MB 尺寸较大时,在入口处观察到细胞堆积增加。因此,对有效分离效率的定义进行了修改,以排除入口处细胞堆积的影响。发现 MB 尺寸为 1.36、3.00 和 4.50 µm 时,有效分离效率分别为 71.6%、76.4% 和 79.4%。研究认为,较大的 MB 与磁力的相互作用更大,因此分离效果更好。然而,具有较小 MB 的细胞更有可能躲避磁力。这项研究为使用这种方法分离肺癌细胞提供了宝贵的见解,有望在癌症诊断和治疗中得到临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ELECTROPHORESIS
ELECTROPHORESIS 生物-分析化学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
244
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.). Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences. Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases. Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered. Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics: • Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry • Single cell and subcellular analysis • Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS) • Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing) • Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation • Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis • Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信