Comparing Methods of Detecting an Elusive Dasyurid Marsupial, the Threatened Julia Creek Dunnart (Sminthopsis douglasi), in Central Western Queensland, Australia

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Alice H. Bakker, Pia Schoenefuss, Greg Mifsud, Susan Fuller, Andrew M. Baker
{"title":"Comparing Methods of Detecting an Elusive Dasyurid Marsupial, the Threatened Julia Creek Dunnart (Sminthopsis douglasi), in Central Western Queensland, Australia","authors":"Alice H. Bakker,&nbsp;Pia Schoenefuss,&nbsp;Greg Mifsud,&nbsp;Susan Fuller,&nbsp;Andrew M. Baker","doi":"10.1002/ece3.70507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Julia Creek dunnart, <i>Sminthopsis douglasi</i>, is a small, threatened carnivorous marsupial occurring in scattered populations in the grasslands of central and northwestern Queensland, Australia. The distribution of the species is largely unknown due to sporadic survey efforts and its historically low detection using traditional live trapping methods. There is an urgent need to determine the best methods of detection to optimise survey methodologies and more effectively manage species conservation efforts. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of live (Elliott) traps, baited white flash camera traps and thermal imagery binocular surveying for detecting <i>S. douglasi</i>. We deployed 40 white flash camera traps at two sites in Bladensburg National Park (south of Winton), where the species is known to occur, for three consecutive periods between June and November 2022. Four comparative sessions of live trapping were undertaken between April and August 2022 at the same locations. During the live trapping periods, a total of 12 nights of surveying were conducted with thermal imagery binoculars in a preliminary assessment of the technique. The total live trapping effort was 3600 trap nights (approximately 700 trap nights per site in each trapping event). Live trapping resulted in 12 detections of individual <i>S. douglasi</i> from 19 total captures. The highest trap success on a given trapping session was 1.71%, and overall trap success from both sites across all sessions was 0.53%. In comparison, baited camera traps (deployed facing the ground at 70 cm range) took 1,269,884 images over 5383 trap nights. There were 11 confirmed images of <i>S. douglasi</i>, on three individual occasions, which represented 2.10% of all small mammal captures and just 0.0009% of the total images. Four species of small mammals were detected using camera traps, whereas live trapping detected only two species. No small mammals were detected on any of the 12 thermal binocular surveys. Overall, our study highlights the comparative high utility of traditional live trapping for detecting <i>S. douglasi</i>. This research provides a framework for ongoing monitoring of the Bladensburg National Park population. It will be more broadly beneficial for informing the best detection techniques of <i>S. douglasi</i> in ongoing work investigating the overall distribution of the species. Similar studies assessing multiple detection methods for small terrestrial mammals have shown an advantage of white flash camera traps compared to other traditional detection techniques. Our contrasting results serve as a reminder that the utility of different techniques for detecting small mammals is best assessed on a species-by-species basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.70507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Julia Creek dunnart, Sminthopsis douglasi, is a small, threatened carnivorous marsupial occurring in scattered populations in the grasslands of central and northwestern Queensland, Australia. The distribution of the species is largely unknown due to sporadic survey efforts and its historically low detection using traditional live trapping methods. There is an urgent need to determine the best methods of detection to optimise survey methodologies and more effectively manage species conservation efforts. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of live (Elliott) traps, baited white flash camera traps and thermal imagery binocular surveying for detecting S. douglasi. We deployed 40 white flash camera traps at two sites in Bladensburg National Park (south of Winton), where the species is known to occur, for three consecutive periods between June and November 2022. Four comparative sessions of live trapping were undertaken between April and August 2022 at the same locations. During the live trapping periods, a total of 12 nights of surveying were conducted with thermal imagery binoculars in a preliminary assessment of the technique. The total live trapping effort was 3600 trap nights (approximately 700 trap nights per site in each trapping event). Live trapping resulted in 12 detections of individual S. douglasi from 19 total captures. The highest trap success on a given trapping session was 1.71%, and overall trap success from both sites across all sessions was 0.53%. In comparison, baited camera traps (deployed facing the ground at 70 cm range) took 1,269,884 images over 5383 trap nights. There were 11 confirmed images of S. douglasi, on three individual occasions, which represented 2.10% of all small mammal captures and just 0.0009% of the total images. Four species of small mammals were detected using camera traps, whereas live trapping detected only two species. No small mammals were detected on any of the 12 thermal binocular surveys. Overall, our study highlights the comparative high utility of traditional live trapping for detecting S. douglasi. This research provides a framework for ongoing monitoring of the Bladensburg National Park population. It will be more broadly beneficial for informing the best detection techniques of S. douglasi in ongoing work investigating the overall distribution of the species. Similar studies assessing multiple detection methods for small terrestrial mammals have shown an advantage of white flash camera traps compared to other traditional detection techniques. Our contrasting results serve as a reminder that the utility of different techniques for detecting small mammals is best assessed on a species-by-species basis.

Abstract Image

比较检测澳大利亚昆士兰州中西部一种难以捉摸的蜥脚类有袋动物--濒临灭绝的朱莉娅溪邓纳特(Sminthopsis douglasi)的方法。
朱莉娅溪疣鼻猴(Sminthopsis douglasi)是一种濒临灭绝的小型食肉有袋类动物,分布于澳大利亚昆士兰州中部和西北部的草原上。由于调查工作时断时续,而且使用传统的活体诱捕方法,该物种的发现率历来很低,因此该物种的分布情况在很大程度上不为人所知。目前迫切需要确定最佳检测方法,以优化调查方法,更有效地管理物种保护工作。在这项研究中,我们比较了活体(埃利奥特)诱捕器、带饵白光照相机诱捕器和热成像双目勘测在探测 S. douglasi 方面的效果。2022 年 6 月至 11 月期间,我们在已知有该物种分布的布拉登斯堡国家公园(温顿以南)的两个地点连续部署了三个时期的 40 个白色闪光相机诱捕器。2022 年 4 月至 8 月期间,在相同地点进行了四次活体诱捕对比。在活体诱捕期间,共使用热成像双筒望远镜进行了 12 个夜晚的调查,以对该技术进行初步评估。现场诱捕总计 3600 个诱捕夜(每次诱捕活动每个地点约 700 个诱捕夜)。活体诱捕共捕获 19 个 S. douglasi 个体,其中发现 12 个。特定诱捕活动的最高诱捕成功率为 1.71%,两个地点所有诱捕活动的总体诱捕成功率为 0.53%。相比之下,带饵相机诱捕器(面向地面部署,距离 70 厘米)在 5383 个诱捕夜中拍摄了 1,269,884 张图像。其中有 11 张确认的图像是 S. douglasi,共 3 次,占所有捕获的小型哺乳动物的 2.10%,仅占图像总数的 0.0009%。使用照相机诱捕器发现了四种小型哺乳动物,而使用活体诱捕器只发现了两种。在 12 次热敏双筒望远镜调查中,没有发现任何一种小型哺乳动物。总之,我们的研究强调了传统活体诱捕法在检测 S. douglasi 方面的相对较高的实用性。这项研究为持续监测布拉登斯堡国家公园种群提供了一个框架。这项研究将更广泛地帮助我们在目前调查 S. douglasi 整体分布的工作中找到最佳的检测技术。类似的研究对小型陆生哺乳动物的多种探测方法进行了评估,结果表明白光照相机陷阱与其他传统探测技术相比更具优势。我们的对比结果提醒我们,最好根据不同的物种来评估不同的小型哺乳动物探测技术的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信