Bypass of Coronary Artery in Renal Artery Stenosis Patients with Heart Chronic Total Occlusion Might Explain the 5-Year Follow-Up after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: B-RASHEF Study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiorenal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1159/000542449
Bin Zheng
{"title":"Bypass of Coronary Artery in Renal Artery Stenosis Patients with Heart Chronic Total Occlusion Might Explain the 5-Year Follow-Up after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: B-RASHEF Study.","authors":"Bin Zheng","doi":"10.1159/000542449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is associated with poor outcome in patients with ischemic heart disease. In this study, we investigated the development of coronary collateral in RAS patients and possible association of RAS with a 5-year outcome after chronic total occlusion-percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO PCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive 58 patients with CTO PCI were enrolled prospectively, including 21 RAS patients (15 unilateral RAS and 6 bilateral RAS) and 37 non-RAS patients. RAS was diagnosed by renal duplex. Coronary collaterals were appraised by CC classification and Rentrop classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Development of left anterior descending artery coronary collateral by Rentrop classification was significantly worse in RAS patients than non-RAS patients. Kaplan-Meier curve of survival was significantly worse in RAS patients than non-RAS patients (p = 0.027). By univariate COX proportional hazard regression analysis, collateral development by CC classification was a significant predictor for 5-year survival. When age, RAS, and collateral development by CC classification were included in multivariate COX proportional hazard regression analysis, only age (hazard ratio: 1.349; 95% confidential interval: 1.058-1.720; p = 0.016) and RAS (hazard ratio: 6.680; 95% confidential interval: 1.322-33.747; p = 0.022) were significant predictors for 5-year survival.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>We concluded that survival in RAS patients after CTO PCI is significantly worse than non-RAS patients, and RAS is a significant predictor for survival after CTO PCI. It seems that injured collateral development might partly explain increased all cause death in RAS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9584,"journal":{"name":"Cardiorenal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"624-634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiorenal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is associated with poor outcome in patients with ischemic heart disease. In this study, we investigated the development of coronary collateral in RAS patients and possible association of RAS with a 5-year outcome after chronic total occlusion-percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO PCI).

Methods: Consecutive 58 patients with CTO PCI were enrolled prospectively, including 21 RAS patients (15 unilateral RAS and 6 bilateral RAS) and 37 non-RAS patients. RAS was diagnosed by renal duplex. Coronary collaterals were appraised by CC classification and Rentrop classification.

Results: Development of left anterior descending artery coronary collateral by Rentrop classification was significantly worse in RAS patients than non-RAS patients. Kaplan-Meier curve of survival was significantly worse in RAS patients than non-RAS patients (p = 0.027). By univariate COX proportional hazard regression analysis, collateral development by CC classification was a significant predictor for 5-year survival. When age, RAS, and collateral development by CC classification were included in multivariate COX proportional hazard regression analysis, only age (hazard ratio: 1.349; 95% confidential interval: 1.058-1.720; p = 0.016) and RAS (hazard ratio: 6.680; 95% confidential interval: 1.322-33.747; p = 0.022) were significant predictors for 5-year survival.

Discussion/conclusion: We concluded that survival in RAS patients after CTO PCI is significantly worse than non-RAS patients, and RAS is a significant predictor for survival after CTO PCI. It seems that injured collateral development might partly explain increased all cause death in RAS patients.

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后5年随访:B-RASHEF研究 "对肾动脉狭窄伴心源性慢性全闭塞患者进行冠状动脉搭桥可能有帮助。
简介肾动脉狭窄(RAS)与缺血性心脏病患者的不良预后有关。在这项研究中,我们调查了RAS患者冠状动脉侧支的发展情况以及RAS与CTO PCI术后5年预后的可能关系:连续 58 例 CTO PCI 患者接受了前瞻性研究,其中包括 21 例 RAS 患者(15 例单侧 RAS,6 例双侧 RAS)和 37 例非 RAS 患者。RAS通过肾脏双工检查确诊。冠状动脉侧支根据CC分类和Rentrop分类进行评估:结果:根据 Rentrop 分级,RAS 患者的 LAD 冠状动脉侧支发展情况明显差于非 RAS 患者。RAS 患者的 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线明显低于非 RAS 患者(P=0.027)。通过单变量 COX 比例危险回归分析,按 CC 分类的侧支发展是 5 年生存率的重要预测因素。当将年龄、RAS和按CC分类的侧支发展纳入多变量COX比例危险回归分析时,只有年龄(危险比:1.349;95% 置信区间:1.058-1.720;P=0.016)和RAS(危险比:6.680;95% 置信区间:1.322-33.747;P=0.022)是5年生存率的重要预测因素:我们得出结论:CTO PCI术后RAS患者的生存率明显低于非RAS患者,RAS是CTO PCI术后生存率的重要预测因素。受伤侧支的发展似乎是 RAS 患者全因死亡增加的部分原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiorenal Medicine
Cardiorenal Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal ''Cardiorenal Medicine'' explores the mechanisms by which obesity and other metabolic abnormalities promote the pathogenesis and progression of heart and kidney disease (cardiorenal metabolic syndrome). It provides an interdisciplinary platform for the advancement of research and clinical practice, focussing on translational issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信