Once-a-Week Ablative Radiotherapy as Replacement of Prolonged Fractionation in Frail Patients: Feasibility and Toxicity Results.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Investigation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1080/07357907.2024.2425729
Liliana Belgioia, Camilla Satragno, Gladys Blandino, Alessandra Fozza, Flavio Giannelli, Michela Marcenaro, Giulia Vidano, Federica Picichè, Francesco Lanfranchi, Alberto Tagliafico, Gianmario Sambuceti, Matteo Bauckneht, Giorgia Timon
{"title":"Once-a-Week Ablative Radiotherapy as Replacement of Prolonged Fractionation in Frail Patients: Feasibility and Toxicity Results.","authors":"Liliana Belgioia, Camilla Satragno, Gladys Blandino, Alessandra Fozza, Flavio Giannelli, Michela Marcenaro, Giulia Vidano, Federica Picichè, Francesco Lanfranchi, Alberto Tagliafico, Gianmario Sambuceti, Matteo Bauckneht, Giorgia Timon","doi":"10.1080/07357907.2024.2425729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this work was to explore the use of an original once-weekly radiotherapy fractionation in elderly or frail patients with recurrence or metastasis from different solid malignancies.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 29 patients treated from 2011 to 2019 with a once-weekly radiotherapy schedule. Patients received a median dose of 27.5 Gy, with weekly fractions of 4-5 Gy over 7-10 weeks. The treatment aimed at both palliative and cytoreductive objectives. Primary endpoints were feasibility and compliance, secondary outcome was acute toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients completed the planned radiotherapy without interruptions. Acute toxicity was mild, with only one patient developing grade 3 toxicity (bowel perforation). Three months post-treatment, 74% of patients experienced symptom relief and tumor response. One-year local control rates were 26.7%, and treatment was generally well-tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This once-weekly hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen demonstrated feasibility, good tolerance, and promising tumor response in frail and elderly patients. Although limited by a small sample size, the approach offers a practical alternative for patients unable to undergo conventional daily radiotherapy. Further studies on larger cohorts are required to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9463,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"893-898"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2024.2425729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this work was to explore the use of an original once-weekly radiotherapy fractionation in elderly or frail patients with recurrence or metastasis from different solid malignancies.

Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 29 patients treated from 2011 to 2019 with a once-weekly radiotherapy schedule. Patients received a median dose of 27.5 Gy, with weekly fractions of 4-5 Gy over 7-10 weeks. The treatment aimed at both palliative and cytoreductive objectives. Primary endpoints were feasibility and compliance, secondary outcome was acute toxicity.

Results: All patients completed the planned radiotherapy without interruptions. Acute toxicity was mild, with only one patient developing grade 3 toxicity (bowel perforation). Three months post-treatment, 74% of patients experienced symptom relief and tumor response. One-year local control rates were 26.7%, and treatment was generally well-tolerated.

Conclusion: This once-weekly hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen demonstrated feasibility, good tolerance, and promising tumor response in frail and elderly patients. Although limited by a small sample size, the approach offers a practical alternative for patients unable to undergo conventional daily radiotherapy. Further studies on larger cohorts are required to validate these findings.

用每周一次的烧蚀放疗替代对体弱患者的长期分次放疗:可行性和毒性结果
简介:这项研究的目的是探讨在不同实体瘤复发或转移的老年或体弱患者中使用一种独创的每周一次的放射治疗分型:本研究旨在探索在不同实体恶性肿瘤复发或转移的老年或体弱患者中使用独创的每周一次放疗分次治疗的方法:对2011年至2019年期间采用每周一次放疗计划治疗的29名患者进行了回顾性分析。患者接受的中位剂量为27.5 Gy,每周一次,每次4-5 Gy,持续7-10周。治疗旨在达到姑息和细胞恢复的目的。主要终点是可行性和依从性,次要结果是急性毒性:结果:所有患者都顺利完成了计划的放疗。急性毒性较轻,只有一名患者出现了三级毒性(肠穿孔)。治疗后三个月,74%的患者症状缓解并出现肿瘤反应。一年的局部控制率为26.7%,治疗耐受性普遍良好:结论:这种每周一次的低分次放疗方案在体弱的老年患者中证明了其可行性、良好的耐受性和良好的肿瘤反应。虽然受样本量较小的限制,但这种方法为无法接受常规每日放疗的患者提供了一种实用的替代方案。要验证这些研究结果,还需要对更大的群体进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Investigation
Cancer Investigation 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
71
审稿时长
8.5 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Investigation is one of the most highly regarded and recognized journals in the field of basic and clinical oncology. It is designed to give physicians a comprehensive resource on the current state of progress in the cancer field as well as a broad background of reliable information necessary for effective decision making. In addition to presenting original papers of fundamental significance, it also publishes reviews, essays, specialized presentations of controversies, considerations of new technologies and their applications to specific laboratory problems, discussions of public issues, miniseries on major topics, new and experimental drugs and therapies, and an innovative letters to the editor section. One of the unique features of the journal is its departmentalized editorial sections reporting on more than 30 subject categories covering the broad spectrum of specialized areas that together comprise the field of oncology. Edited by leading physicians and research scientists, these sections make Cancer Investigation the prime resource for clinicians seeking to make sense of the sometimes-overwhelming amount of information available throughout the field. In addition to its peer-reviewed clinical research, the journal also features translational studies that bridge the gap between the laboratory and the clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信