Effects of aspirin and omega-3 fatty acids on composite and subdomain scores from the NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaire: the ASCEND-Eye randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Emily L Sammons, Georgina Buck, Louise J Bowman, William M Stevens, Imen Hammami, Sarah Parish, Jane Armitage
{"title":"Effects of aspirin and omega-3 fatty acids on composite and subdomain scores from the NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaire: the ASCEND-Eye randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Emily L Sammons, Georgina Buck, Louise J Bowman, William M Stevens, Imen Hammami, Sarah Parish, Jane Armitage","doi":"10.1186/s12886-024-03741-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The double-blind, 2 × 2 factorial design, placebo-controlled ASCEND randomized trial compared the effects of 100 mg aspirin daily and, separately, 1 g omega-3 fatty acids (FAs) daily on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in 15,480 UK adults with diabetes. We report the effects of these randomized treatment allocations on scores derived from the National Eye Institute's Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) in a subset of participants involved in the ASCEND-Eye sub-study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ordinal data from the NEI-VFQ-25 were analyzed using proportional odds regression methods. A common odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was used to interpret the average effect size of randomization to each study treatment on composite and subdomain scores from the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neither randomization to aspirin nor omega-3 FAs for 7.5 years significantly affected composite or subdomain scores from the NEI-VFQ-25.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Applying the NEI-VFQ-25 in ASCEND-Eye represents one of the largest surveys of vision-targeted health-related quality of life in people with diabetes. Further observational analyses of these data are planned, to identify the clinical and demographic characteristics associated with lower composite and subdomain scores in a diabetic population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Eudract No. 2004-000991-15; Multicentre Research Ethics Committee Ref No. 03/8/087 (29th December 2003); ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT00135226 (24th August 2005); ISRCTN No. ISRCTN60635500 (1st September 2005).</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03741-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The double-blind, 2 × 2 factorial design, placebo-controlled ASCEND randomized trial compared the effects of 100 mg aspirin daily and, separately, 1 g omega-3 fatty acids (FAs) daily on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in 15,480 UK adults with diabetes. We report the effects of these randomized treatment allocations on scores derived from the National Eye Institute's Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) in a subset of participants involved in the ASCEND-Eye sub-study.

Methods: Ordinal data from the NEI-VFQ-25 were analyzed using proportional odds regression methods. A common odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was used to interpret the average effect size of randomization to each study treatment on composite and subdomain scores from the questionnaire.

Results: Neither randomization to aspirin nor omega-3 FAs for 7.5 years significantly affected composite or subdomain scores from the NEI-VFQ-25.

Conclusion: Applying the NEI-VFQ-25 in ASCEND-Eye represents one of the largest surveys of vision-targeted health-related quality of life in people with diabetes. Further observational analyses of these data are planned, to identify the clinical and demographic characteristics associated with lower composite and subdomain scores in a diabetic population.

Trial registration: Eudract No. 2004-000991-15; Multicentre Research Ethics Committee Ref No. 03/8/087 (29th December 2003); ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT00135226 (24th August 2005); ISRCTN No. ISRCTN60635500 (1st September 2005).

阿司匹林和欧米伽-3 脂肪酸对 NEI-VFQ-25 问卷综合得分和子域得分的影响:ASCEND-Eye 随机对照试验。
背景:双盲、2 × 2因子设计、安慰剂对照的ASCEND随机试验比较了每天服用100毫克阿司匹林和每天分别服用1克欧米伽-3脂肪酸(FAs)对15480名英国成人糖尿病患者心血管疾病一级预防的效果。我们报告了这些随机治疗分配对参与 ASCEND-Eye 子研究的一部分参与者的国家眼科研究所视觉功能问卷-25(NEI-VFQ-25)得分的影响:方法: 使用比例几率回归法分析了来自 NEI-VFQ-25 的序数数据。使用带有95%置信区间的普通赔率来解释随机接受每种研究治疗对问卷中综合和子域得分的平均效应大小:结果:阿司匹林和欧米伽-3脂肪酸7.5年的随机化均未对NEI-VFQ-25的综合或分域得分产生显著影响:在 ASCEND-Eye 中应用 NEI-VFQ-25 是针对糖尿病患者视力健康相关生活质量的最大规模调查之一。我们计划对这些数据进行进一步的观察分析,以确定在糖尿病人群中与较低的综合和子域得分相关的临床和人口特征:试验注册:Eudract 编号:2004-000991-15;多中心研究伦理委员会编号:03/8/087(2003 年 12 月 29 日);ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT00135226(2005 年 8 月 24 日);ISRCTN 编号:ISRCTN60635500(2005 年 9 月 1 日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信