A Multidisciplinary Consensus-Building Exercise to Define and Prioritize Topics in Supportive Care of Children With Cancer at a Global Level

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70377
Elizabeth Sniderman, Tea Reljic, Manoo Bhakta, Miguel Bonilla, Julie Clyce, Jessica Farmer, Monica Key, Sergio Licona, Jennifer L. Pauley, Alondra Torres-Gonzalez, Michael Sullivan, Nickhill Bhakta, Ambuj Kumar, Sheena Mukkada
{"title":"A Multidisciplinary Consensus-Building Exercise to Define and Prioritize Topics in Supportive Care of Children With Cancer at a Global Level","authors":"Elizabeth Sniderman,&nbsp;Tea Reljic,&nbsp;Manoo Bhakta,&nbsp;Miguel Bonilla,&nbsp;Julie Clyce,&nbsp;Jessica Farmer,&nbsp;Monica Key,&nbsp;Sergio Licona,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Pauley,&nbsp;Alondra Torres-Gonzalez,&nbsp;Michael Sullivan,&nbsp;Nickhill Bhakta,&nbsp;Ambuj Kumar,&nbsp;Sheena Mukkada","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Optimal outcomes during childhood cancer treatment require effective management of toxicities, often called supportive care. A lack of agreement on what comprises supportive care limits the development and provision of comprehensive guidance (for this work, we have defined supportive care as any disease- or treatment-related condition experienced by children with cancer, excluding psychosocial conditions, palliative care, survivorship, or procedural topics). To address this gap, we conducted a consensus-building exercise among global experts to define and prioritize topics for supportive care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two rounds of brainstorming and prioritization exercises were conducted. A multidisciplinary panel nominated by professional societies and cooperative groups was formed to ensure geographic and resource representation using snowball sampling. An internal expert panel generated an initial list of supportive care topics. In round one, the multidisciplinary panel reviewed the initial list and recommended additional topics, followed by prioritization in round two using a seven-point Likert scale. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The multidisciplinary panel consisted of 57 members representing 32 countries. The initial list included 46 topics; 161 additional topics were suggested. After removing duplicates and out-of-scope additions, the final list contained 62 topics. Febrile neutropenia, sepsis, bloodstream infections, and pain were ranked highest priority. Mortality, morbidity, and frequency of the event were identified as the most important factors influencing prioritization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Through a multidisciplinary and globally representative process, we identified core supportive care topics and factors influencing their prioritization for childhood cancer. Outputs from this work will inform efforts to generate resource-adapted recommendations for a global audience. This supports ongoing WHO CureAll work to develop a health systems-level policy brief of supportive care requirements in the management of children with cancer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"13 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70377","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70377","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Optimal outcomes during childhood cancer treatment require effective management of toxicities, often called supportive care. A lack of agreement on what comprises supportive care limits the development and provision of comprehensive guidance (for this work, we have defined supportive care as any disease- or treatment-related condition experienced by children with cancer, excluding psychosocial conditions, palliative care, survivorship, or procedural topics). To address this gap, we conducted a consensus-building exercise among global experts to define and prioritize topics for supportive care.

Methods

Two rounds of brainstorming and prioritization exercises were conducted. A multidisciplinary panel nominated by professional societies and cooperative groups was formed to ensure geographic and resource representation using snowball sampling. An internal expert panel generated an initial list of supportive care topics. In round one, the multidisciplinary panel reviewed the initial list and recommended additional topics, followed by prioritization in round two using a seven-point Likert scale. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results

The multidisciplinary panel consisted of 57 members representing 32 countries. The initial list included 46 topics; 161 additional topics were suggested. After removing duplicates and out-of-scope additions, the final list contained 62 topics. Febrile neutropenia, sepsis, bloodstream infections, and pain were ranked highest priority. Mortality, morbidity, and frequency of the event were identified as the most important factors influencing prioritization.

Conclusion

Through a multidisciplinary and globally representative process, we identified core supportive care topics and factors influencing their prioritization for childhood cancer. Outputs from this work will inform efforts to generate resource-adapted recommendations for a global audience. This supports ongoing WHO CureAll work to develop a health systems-level policy brief of supportive care requirements in the management of children with cancer.

Abstract Image

开展多学科共识建设活动,在全球范围内确定癌症患儿支持性护理的主题和优先顺序。
介绍:儿童癌症治疗的最佳效果需要对毒性反应进行有效管理,这通常被称为支持性治疗。由于对支持性护理的内容缺乏共识,因此限制了全面指导的制定和提供(在这项工作中,我们将支持性护理定义为癌症儿童所经历的任何与疾病或治疗相关的状况,但不包括社会心理状况、姑息治疗、幸存者或程序主题)。为了弥补这一不足,我们在全球专家中开展了一次建立共识的活动,以确定支持性护理主题的定义和优先顺序:我们开展了两轮集思广益和优先排序活动。我们组建了一个由专业协会和合作团体提名的多学科专家小组,通过滚雪球式抽样确保地域和资源的代表性。一个内部专家小组提出了一份支持性护理主题的初步清单。在第一轮中,多学科专家小组审查了初步清单并推荐了其他主题,随后在第二轮中使用七点李克特量表确定了优先顺序。结果采用描述性统计进行总结:多学科小组由代表 32 个国家的 57 名成员组成。初步清单包括 46 个主题;另外还提出了 161 个主题。剔除重复和超出范围的内容后,最终清单包含 62 个主题。发热性中性粒细胞减少症、败血症、血流感染和疼痛被列为最高优先级。死亡率、发病率和事件频率被认为是影响优先级的最重要因素:通过一个多学科和具有全球代表性的过程,我们确定了儿童癌症支持性护理的核心主题以及影响其优先级的因素。这项工作的成果将有助于为全球受众提出资源适应性建议。这项工作支持世界卫生组织CureAll正在开展的工作,即编制一份卫生系统层面的政策简报,介绍在管理儿童癌症患者方面的支持性护理要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信