The mobile seniors' clinic - an innovative transition of care for frail older adults.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Valérie Boucher, Eva-Marie Jouhair, Marie-Josée Sirois, Luc Tailleur, Philippe Voyer, Éric Mercier, Anik Giguère, Clermont E Dionne, France Légaré, Clémence Dallaire, Stéphane Bergeron, Pierre-Hugues Carmichael, Marcel Emond
{"title":"The mobile seniors' clinic - an innovative transition of care for frail older adults.","authors":"Valérie Boucher, Eva-Marie Jouhair, Marie-Josée Sirois, Luc Tailleur, Philippe Voyer, Éric Mercier, Anik Giguère, Clermont E Dionne, France Légaré, Clémence Dallaire, Stéphane Bergeron, Pierre-Hugues Carmichael, Marcel Emond","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05490-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the impact of Quebec's first hospital-at-home-inspired mobile Seniors' Clinic, the \"Clinique des Ainés (CDA)\", on frail older adults' returns to the Emergency Department (ED), mortality, and hospital Length Of Stay (LOS) and rehospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Quasi-experimental pre-post implementation cohort study.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Patients aged ≥ 75 years admitted to the short-term geriatric unit after an ED consultation (control) or included by the CDA (intervention).</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>return to ED (RtoED), mortality, ED & hospital LOS, and rehospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses: </strong>Multivariable regression modelling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 891 patients were included. At the intervention site (CDA) (n = 437), RtoED were similar at 30 (17.5% & 19.5%, p = 0.58), 90 (34.4% & 37.3%, p = 0.46) and 180 days (47.2% & 54.0%, p = 0.07) in the pre and post-implementation phases. No mortality differences were found. The hospitalization LOS was significantly shorter (28.26 and 14.22 days, p < 0.01). At 90 days, rehospitalization LOS was decreased by 8.51 days (p = 0.02) and by 6.48 days at 180 days (p = 0.03). Compared to the control site (n = 454) in the post-implementation phase, RtoED was 54% at the intervention site compared to 44.1% (p = 0.02) at 180 days. The CDA had a lower adjusted probability of mortality at 90 days compared to the control site (4.8% VS 11.7%, p = 0.03). No rehospitalization LOS differences were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Clinique des Ainés showed effectiveness in caring for frail older patients in their homes by decreasing their hospital LOS by half and 90 days mortality risk. It was a safe care trajectory without a clinically significant increase in ED returns or mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"914"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05490-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the impact of Quebec's first hospital-at-home-inspired mobile Seniors' Clinic, the "Clinique des Ainés (CDA)", on frail older adults' returns to the Emergency Department (ED), mortality, and hospital Length Of Stay (LOS) and rehospitalizations.

Methods: Design: Quasi-experimental pre-post implementation cohort study.

Population: Patients aged ≥ 75 years admitted to the short-term geriatric unit after an ED consultation (control) or included by the CDA (intervention).

Outcomes: return to ED (RtoED), mortality, ED & hospital LOS, and rehospitalizations.

Statistical analyses: Multivariable regression modelling.

Results: Overall, 891 patients were included. At the intervention site (CDA) (n = 437), RtoED were similar at 30 (17.5% & 19.5%, p = 0.58), 90 (34.4% & 37.3%, p = 0.46) and 180 days (47.2% & 54.0%, p = 0.07) in the pre and post-implementation phases. No mortality differences were found. The hospitalization LOS was significantly shorter (28.26 and 14.22 days, p < 0.01). At 90 days, rehospitalization LOS was decreased by 8.51 days (p = 0.02) and by 6.48 days at 180 days (p = 0.03). Compared to the control site (n = 454) in the post-implementation phase, RtoED was 54% at the intervention site compared to 44.1% (p = 0.02) at 180 days. The CDA had a lower adjusted probability of mortality at 90 days compared to the control site (4.8% VS 11.7%, p = 0.03). No rehospitalization LOS differences were noted.

Conclusions: The Clinique des Ainés showed effectiveness in caring for frail older patients in their homes by decreasing their hospital LOS by half and 90 days mortality risk. It was a safe care trajectory without a clinically significant increase in ED returns or mortality.

流动老年人诊所--为体弱老年人提供创新的过渡护理。
研究背景本研究旨在评估魁北克首个受医院启发的流动老年人诊所 "Clinique des Ainés (CDA) "对体弱老年人重返急诊科(ED)、死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和再次住院的影响:方法:设计:方法:设计:实施前-实施后的准实验性队列研究:结果:返回急诊室(RtoED)、死亡率、急诊室和住院时间以及再次住院:统计分析:多变量回归模型:结果:共纳入 891 名患者。在干预地点(CDA)(n = 437),在实施前和实施后阶段,30 天(17.5% 和 19.5%,p = 0.58)、90 天(34.4% 和 37.3%,p = 0.46)和 180 天(47.2% 和 54.0%,p = 0.07)的 RtoED 相似。未发现死亡率差异。住院时间明显缩短(分别为 28.26 天和 14.22 天,P=0.05):Ainés 诊所显示了在家中照顾年老体弱病人的有效性,将他们的住院时间缩短了一半,并降低了 90 天的死亡风险。这是一种安全的护理方式,不会增加急诊室就诊率或死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信