Ultrastructural polymicrobial Staphylococcus aureus-Pseudomonas aeruginosa interactions and antimicrobial resistance in ex vivo cornea model.

IF 2.5 4区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Sanchita Mitra, Nagapriya Banka, Soumyava Basu, Tirupathi Rao
{"title":"Ultrastructural polymicrobial <i>Staphylococcus aureus-Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> interactions and antimicrobial resistance in <i>ex vivo</i> cornea model.","authors":"Sanchita Mitra, Nagapriya Banka, Soumyava Basu, Tirupathi Rao","doi":"10.1080/17460913.2024.2417617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To investigate antagonistic interactions among pathogens, in <i>ex vivo</i> donor corneas infected with monomicrobial or polymicrobial combinations of antibiotic susceptible and resistant clinical isolates of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MSSA, MRSA) and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (S-PA, MDR-PA).<b>Materials & methods:</b> Scanning electron microscopy and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST, broth microdilution for minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations [MIC/MBC]) pre-and post-polymicrobial interactions, in infected donor corneas.<b>Results:</b> MSSA lost viability with S-PA/MDR-PA, while MRSA formed larger cells, biofilm and lower MIC (teicoplanin) with S-PA, but lost viability with MDR-PA. S-PA had lower MIC (ceftazidime, meropenem, chloramphenicol) with MSSA, and lower MBC (cefoperazone, ciprofloxacin) and fewer cells with MRSA. MDR-PA had abundant cells and no change in AST with MSSA or MRSA.<b>Conclusion:</b> Significant antagonistic interactions occur in ocular polymicrobial infections, affecting antibiotic susceptible isolates more than resistant ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":12773,"journal":{"name":"Future microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17460913.2024.2417617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To investigate antagonistic interactions among pathogens, in ex vivo donor corneas infected with monomicrobial or polymicrobial combinations of antibiotic susceptible and resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (S-PA, MDR-PA).Materials & methods: Scanning electron microscopy and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST, broth microdilution for minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations [MIC/MBC]) pre-and post-polymicrobial interactions, in infected donor corneas.Results: MSSA lost viability with S-PA/MDR-PA, while MRSA formed larger cells, biofilm and lower MIC (teicoplanin) with S-PA, but lost viability with MDR-PA. S-PA had lower MIC (ceftazidime, meropenem, chloramphenicol) with MSSA, and lower MBC (cefoperazone, ciprofloxacin) and fewer cells with MRSA. MDR-PA had abundant cells and no change in AST with MSSA or MRSA.Conclusion: Significant antagonistic interactions occur in ocular polymicrobial infections, affecting antibiotic susceptible isolates more than resistant ones.

体外角膜模型中金葡萄球菌-铜绿假单胞菌相互作用的超微结构和抗菌药耐药性。
目的:研究金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA、MRSA)和铜绿假单胞菌(S-PA、MDR-PA)的抗生素易感性和耐药性临床分离株的单微生物或多微生物组合感染的体外供体角膜中病原体之间的拮抗相互作用:扫描电子显微镜和抗菌药物敏感性测试(AST、肉汤微量稀释最低抑菌和杀菌浓度[MIC/MBC]),在受感染的供体角膜上进行多微生物相互作用前后的测试:MSSA在S-PA/MDR-PA作用下失去活力,而MRSA在S-PA作用下形成更大的细胞和生物膜,MIC(teicoplanin)更低,但在MDR-PA作用下失去活力。S-PA 对 MSSA 的 MIC(头孢他啶、美罗培南、氯霉素)较低,对 MRSA 的 MBC(头孢哌酮、环丙沙星)较低,细胞较少。MDR-PA 有大量细胞,而 MSSA 或 MRSA 的 AST 没有变化:结论:在眼部多微生物感染中存在明显的拮抗相互作用,对抗生素易感分离株的影响大于耐药分离株。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Future microbiology
Future microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Microbiology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for this increasingly important and vast area of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信