Direct loss-based seismic design of low-rise base-isolated reinforced concrete buildings

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Diego Suarez, Gian Michele Calvi, Roberto Gentile
{"title":"Direct loss-based seismic design of low-rise base-isolated reinforced concrete buildings","authors":"Diego Suarez,&nbsp;Gian Michele Calvi,&nbsp;Roberto Gentile","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper proposes a procedure to design low-rise base-isolated structures achieving a specific target level of earthquake-induced loss (e.g., dollars, downtime) while complying with a predefined minimum level of structural reliability. The procedure is “direct” since the target loss is specified at the first step of the process, and virtually no design iterations are required. Direct loss-based design (DLBD) is enabled by a simplified loss assessment module involving: (1) surrogate probabilistic seismic demand models representing the probability distribution of peak horizontal displacements and accelerations on top of the isolation layer conditional on different ground-motion intensity levels; (2) approximations of the superstructure response; (3) simplified consequence models for isolation system and superstructure based on damage-to-loss ratios (economic loss or repair time); (4) simplified consequence models for acceleration- and drift-sensitive non-structural components, based on storey loss functions of a potential inventory of components. Given some basic geometrical parameters of the superstructure, DLBD provides the isolation system's force-displacement curve and the required superstructure's strength complying with a selected loss target. The members' structural detailing follows the principles of direct displacement-based design, sectional analysis, and the general theory of base isolation. The procedure is illustrated by designing six reinforced concrete wall buildings (two-, three-, and four-storeys) base isolated with lead rubber bearings, to achieve predefined targets of expected repair time. Repair time is benchmarked against a more refined method adopting a cloud-based non-linear time history analysis, finding a maximum underestimation of 17%, thus confirming the dependability of DLBD. Such error is almost entirely attributable to the simplified estimation of peak floor accelerations, and it could be potentially eliminated by refining such estimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"53 15","pages":"4641-4669"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eqe.4238","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper proposes a procedure to design low-rise base-isolated structures achieving a specific target level of earthquake-induced loss (e.g., dollars, downtime) while complying with a predefined minimum level of structural reliability. The procedure is “direct” since the target loss is specified at the first step of the process, and virtually no design iterations are required. Direct loss-based design (DLBD) is enabled by a simplified loss assessment module involving: (1) surrogate probabilistic seismic demand models representing the probability distribution of peak horizontal displacements and accelerations on top of the isolation layer conditional on different ground-motion intensity levels; (2) approximations of the superstructure response; (3) simplified consequence models for isolation system and superstructure based on damage-to-loss ratios (economic loss or repair time); (4) simplified consequence models for acceleration- and drift-sensitive non-structural components, based on storey loss functions of a potential inventory of components. Given some basic geometrical parameters of the superstructure, DLBD provides the isolation system's force-displacement curve and the required superstructure's strength complying with a selected loss target. The members' structural detailing follows the principles of direct displacement-based design, sectional analysis, and the general theory of base isolation. The procedure is illustrated by designing six reinforced concrete wall buildings (two-, three-, and four-storeys) base isolated with lead rubber bearings, to achieve predefined targets of expected repair time. Repair time is benchmarked against a more refined method adopting a cloud-based non-linear time history analysis, finding a maximum underestimation of 17%, thus confirming the dependability of DLBD. Such error is almost entirely attributable to the simplified estimation of peak floor accelerations, and it could be potentially eliminated by refining such estimation.

Abstract Image

基于直接损失的低层基础隔震钢筋混凝土建筑抗震设计
本文提出了一种程序,用于设计低层基底隔震结构,使其达到地震引起损失的特定目标水平(如美元、停机时间),同时符合预先确定的最低结构可靠性水平。该程序是 "直接 "的,因为目标损失在程序的第一步就已指定,几乎不需要反复设计。基于损失的直接设计(DLBD)由一个简化的损失评估模块实现,该模块包括(1) 代表不同地动烈度水平下隔震层顶部水平位移和加速度峰值概率分布的代用概率地震需求模型;(2) 上部结构响应近似值;(3) 基于破坏损失比(经济损失或修复时间)的隔震系统和上部结构简化后果模型;(4) 基于潜在组件清单的层损失函数的加速度和漂移敏感性非结构组件简化后果模型。给定上部结构的一些基本几何参数后,DLBD 可提供隔震系统的力-位移曲线和所需的上部结构强度,以满足选定的损失目标。构件的结构细部设计遵循基于位移的直接设计、截面分析和基底隔震一般理论的原则。通过设计六栋钢筋混凝土墙体建筑(两层、三层和四层),使用铅橡胶支座进行基础隔离,以实现预定的预期修复时间目标,来说明该程序。采用基于云的非线性时间历史分析的更精细方法对修复时间进行了基准测试,发现最大低估率为 17%,从而证实了 DLBD 的可靠性。这种误差几乎完全归因于对楼层加速度峰值的简化估算,而通过改进这种估算有可能消除这种误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信