A modeling analysis on industrial radial-flow packed-bed reactors for the catalytic dehydrogenation of long-chain normal paraffins: Appraisal of the modeling approach
{"title":"A modeling analysis on industrial radial-flow packed-bed reactors for the catalytic dehydrogenation of long-chain normal paraffins: Appraisal of the modeling approach","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cherd.2024.10.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Catalytic dehydrogenation of long-chain normal paraffins is the most attractive route for producing of linear alkyl benzene. To make this happen, the radial-flow packed-bed reactors are employed as one of the most efficient currently available technologies. Simplifying assumptions that are sometimes imposed on reactor models to reduce the computational cost may also significantly decrease the accuracy of simulations. Here, it is decided to shed light on this matter by assessing the effect of typical model-simplifying assumptions on simulation results. To this end, one- and two-dimensional semi-homogeneous models are used to simulate an industrial-scale radial-flow packed-bed dehydrogenation reactor under isothermal and adiabatic conditions. Simulations are designed in four 1D isothermal, 1D adiabatic, 2D isothermal, and 2D adiabatic modes to compare different modeling strategies and investigate the effect of flow distribution on the reactor performance. An appropriate LHHW kinetics model is considered for paraffin dehydrogenation and the main associated side reactions over a commercial Pt-Sn-K-Mg/<em>γ</em>-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> catalyst. The model equations are solved numerically using the finite element method by COMSOL Multiphysics CFD software. The results show a 1–3 % discrepancy between the predictions of one- and two-dimensional models for feed conversion under isothermal and adiabatic conditions. In contrast, the comparison of isothermal and adiabatic results for each one- and two-dimensional models indicate a discrepancy of 33–36 %. Furthermore, the two-dimensional model shows a low non-uniformity in flow distribution under reaction conditions (∼ 0.175), which has a trivial negative effect on paraffin conversion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10019,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263876224006191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Catalytic dehydrogenation of long-chain normal paraffins is the most attractive route for producing of linear alkyl benzene. To make this happen, the radial-flow packed-bed reactors are employed as one of the most efficient currently available technologies. Simplifying assumptions that are sometimes imposed on reactor models to reduce the computational cost may also significantly decrease the accuracy of simulations. Here, it is decided to shed light on this matter by assessing the effect of typical model-simplifying assumptions on simulation results. To this end, one- and two-dimensional semi-homogeneous models are used to simulate an industrial-scale radial-flow packed-bed dehydrogenation reactor under isothermal and adiabatic conditions. Simulations are designed in four 1D isothermal, 1D adiabatic, 2D isothermal, and 2D adiabatic modes to compare different modeling strategies and investigate the effect of flow distribution on the reactor performance. An appropriate LHHW kinetics model is considered for paraffin dehydrogenation and the main associated side reactions over a commercial Pt-Sn-K-Mg/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. The model equations are solved numerically using the finite element method by COMSOL Multiphysics CFD software. The results show a 1–3 % discrepancy between the predictions of one- and two-dimensional models for feed conversion under isothermal and adiabatic conditions. In contrast, the comparison of isothermal and adiabatic results for each one- and two-dimensional models indicate a discrepancy of 33–36 %. Furthermore, the two-dimensional model shows a low non-uniformity in flow distribution under reaction conditions (∼ 0.175), which has a trivial negative effect on paraffin conversion.
期刊介绍:
ChERD aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in chemical engineering.
Papers showing how research results can be used in chemical engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in plant or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of traditional chemical engineering.