Analysis of Clinical Utility of Functional MRI in Neurosurgical Decision-Making in Focal Epilepsy.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christopher O'Grady, Antonina Omisade
{"title":"Analysis of Clinical Utility of Functional MRI in Neurosurgical Decision-Making in Focal Epilepsy.","authors":"Christopher O'Grady, Antonina Omisade","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional MRI (fMRI) has proven valuable in presurgical planning for people with brain tumors. However, it is underutilized for patients with epilepsy, likely due to less data on its added clinical value in this population. We reviewed clinical fMRI referrals at the QEII Health Sciences Center (Halifax, Nova Scotia) to determine the impact of fMRI on surgical planning for patients with epilepsy. We focused on reasons for fMRI referrals, findings and clinical decisions based on fMRI findings, as well as postoperative cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent fMRI between June 2015 and March 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Language lateralization represented the primary indication for fMRI (100%), with 7.7% of patients also referred for motor and sensory mapping. Language dominance on the side of resection was observed in 12.8% of patients; in 20.5%, activation was adjacent to the proposed resection site. In 18% of patients, fMRI provided an indication for further invasive testing due to the risk of significant cognitive morbidity (e.g., anterograde amnesia). Further invasive testing was avoided based on fMRI findings in 69.2% of patients. Cognitive outcomes based on combined neuropsychological findings and fMRI-determined language dominance were variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>fMRI in epilepsy was most often required to identify hemispheric language dominance. Although fMRI-determined language dominance was not directly predictive of cognitive outcomes, it helped identify patients at low risk of catastrophic cognitive morbidity and those at high risk who required additional invasive testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Functional MRI (fMRI) has proven valuable in presurgical planning for people with brain tumors. However, it is underutilized for patients with epilepsy, likely due to less data on its added clinical value in this population. We reviewed clinical fMRI referrals at the QEII Health Sciences Center (Halifax, Nova Scotia) to determine the impact of fMRI on surgical planning for patients with epilepsy. We focused on reasons for fMRI referrals, findings and clinical decisions based on fMRI findings, as well as postoperative cognitive outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent fMRI between June 2015 and March 2021.

Results: Language lateralization represented the primary indication for fMRI (100%), with 7.7% of patients also referred for motor and sensory mapping. Language dominance on the side of resection was observed in 12.8% of patients; in 20.5%, activation was adjacent to the proposed resection site. In 18% of patients, fMRI provided an indication for further invasive testing due to the risk of significant cognitive morbidity (e.g., anterograde amnesia). Further invasive testing was avoided based on fMRI findings in 69.2% of patients. Cognitive outcomes based on combined neuropsychological findings and fMRI-determined language dominance were variable.

Conclusion: fMRI in epilepsy was most often required to identify hemispheric language dominance. Although fMRI-determined language dominance was not directly predictive of cognitive outcomes, it helped identify patients at low risk of catastrophic cognitive morbidity and those at high risk who required additional invasive testing.

功能磁共振成像在局灶性癫痫的神经外科决策中的临床实用性分析。
背景:功能磁共振成像(fMRI)已被证明对脑肿瘤患者的术前规划很有价值。然而,对癫痫患者来说,功能磁共振成像的利用率却很低,这很可能是由于在这一人群中有关其附加临床价值的数据较少。我们回顾了 QEII 健康科学中心(新斯科舍省哈利法克斯)的临床 fMRI 转诊情况,以确定 fMRI 对癫痫患者手术规划的影响。我们的重点是 fMRI 转诊原因、研究结果、基于 fMRI 研究结果的临床决策以及术后认知结果:我们对 2015 年 6 月至 2021 年 3 月期间接受 fMRI 检查的患者进行了回顾性病历审查:语言侧化是 fMRI 的主要适应症(100%),7.7% 的患者还需进行运动和感觉图谱检查。12.8%的患者在切除一侧出现语言优势;20.5%的患者在拟切除部位附近出现激活。在 18% 的患者中,fMRI 提供了进一步有创检查的指征,因为存在重大认知病变的风险(如逆行性遗忘)。69.2%的患者根据fMRI检查结果避免了进一步的侵入性检查。基于神经心理学结果和fMRI确定的语言优势的认知结果各不相同。结论:癫痫患者通常需要通过fMRI来确定大脑半球的语言优势。虽然由 fMRI 确定的语言优势并不能直接预测认知结果,但它有助于识别出现灾难性认知病症的低风险患者和需要进行额外侵入性测试的高风险患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信