Strategies to Overcome Erroneous Outcomes in Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Testing: Insights From the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2024-11-03 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.72954
Sm Shafiul Alam Sajal, Dewan Zubaer Islam, Shahad Saif Khandker, Elizabeth Solórzano-Ortiz, Manal Fardoun, Md Firoz Ahmed, Mohd Raeed Jamiruddin, Nafisa Azmuda, Miral Mehta, Santosh Kumar, Mainul Haque, Nihad Adnan
{"title":"Strategies to Overcome Erroneous Outcomes in Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Testing: Insights From the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Sm Shafiul Alam Sajal, Dewan Zubaer Islam, Shahad Saif Khandker, Elizabeth Solórzano-Ortiz, Manal Fardoun, Md Firoz Ahmed, Mohd Raeed Jamiruddin, Nafisa Azmuda, Miral Mehta, Santosh Kumar, Mainul Haque, Nihad Adnan","doi":"10.7759/cureus.72954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test to detect SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, has been regarded as the diagnostic gold standard. However, the excessive sensitivity of RT-PCR may cause false-positive outcomes from contamination. Again, its technical complexity increases the chances of false-negatives due to pre-analytical and analytical errors. This narrative review explores the elements contributing to inaccurate results during the COVID-19 pandemic and offers strategies to minimize these errors. False-positive results may occur due to specimen contamination, non-specific primer binding, residual viral RNA, and false-negatives, which may arise from improper sampling, timing, labeling, storage, low viral loads, mutations, and faulty test kits. Proposed mitigation strategies to enhance the accuracy of RT-PCR testing include comprehensive staff training in specimen collection, optimizing the timing of tests, analyzing multiple gene targets, incorporating clinical findings, workflow automation, and implementing stringent contamination control measures. Identifying and rectifying sources of error in RT-PCR diagnosis through quality control and standardized protocols is imperative for ensuring quality patient care and effective epidemic control.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11532724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test to detect SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, has been regarded as the diagnostic gold standard. However, the excessive sensitivity of RT-PCR may cause false-positive outcomes from contamination. Again, its technical complexity increases the chances of false-negatives due to pre-analytical and analytical errors. This narrative review explores the elements contributing to inaccurate results during the COVID-19 pandemic and offers strategies to minimize these errors. False-positive results may occur due to specimen contamination, non-specific primer binding, residual viral RNA, and false-negatives, which may arise from improper sampling, timing, labeling, storage, low viral loads, mutations, and faulty test kits. Proposed mitigation strategies to enhance the accuracy of RT-PCR testing include comprehensive staff training in specimen collection, optimizing the timing of tests, analyzing multiple gene targets, incorporating clinical findings, workflow automation, and implementing stringent contamination control measures. Identifying and rectifying sources of error in RT-PCR diagnosis through quality control and standardized protocols is imperative for ensuring quality patient care and effective epidemic control.

克服反转录聚合酶链反应 (RT-PCR) 检测错误结果的策略:从 COVID-19 大流行中获得的启示。
反转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测 SARS-CoV-2(引起 COVID-19 的病毒)一直被视为诊断的金标准。然而,RT-PCR 的灵敏度过高,可能会因污染而导致假阳性结果。此外,RT-PCR 技术的复杂性也增加了因分析前和分析中的错误而导致假阴性结果的几率。本综述探讨了在 COVID-19 大流行期间导致结果不准确的因素,并提出了尽量减少这些错误的策略。标本污染、非特异性引物结合、残留病毒 RNA 和假阴性都可能导致假阳性结果的出现,而假阴性可能源于不恰当的采样、时间、标签、储存、低病毒载量、突变和有问题的检测试剂盒。为提高 RT-PCR 检测的准确性而提出的缓解策略包括:对员工进行标本采集方面的全面培训、优化检测时间、分析多个基因靶标、结合临床结果、工作流程自动化以及实施严格的污染控制措施。通过质量控制和标准化规程来识别和纠正 RT-PCR 诊断中的错误源,是确保优质患者护理和有效疫情控制的当务之急。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信